THE USE OF ACTIVE PERSONAL DOSEMETERS IN INTERVENTIONAL WORKPLACES IN HOSPITALS: COMPARISON BETWEEN ACTIVE AND PASSIVE DOSEMETERS WORN SIMULTANEOUSLY BY MEDICAL STAFF.


Journal

Radiation protection dosimetry
ISSN: 1742-3406
Titre abrégé: Radiat Prot Dosimetry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8109958

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Jun 2020
Historique:
received: 11 05 2019
revised: 11 05 2019
accepted: 12 07 2019
pubmed: 14 12 2019
medline: 24 3 2021
entrez: 14 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Medical staff in interventional procedures are among the professionals with the highest occupational doses. Active personal dosemeters (APDs) can help in optimizing the exposure during interventional procedures. However, there can be problems when using APDs during interventional procedures, due to the specific energy and angular distribution of the radiation field and because of the pulsed nature of the radiation. Many parameters like the type of interventional procedure, personal habits and working techniques, protection tools used and X-ray field characteristics influence the occupational exposure and the scattered radiation around the patient. In this paper, we compare the results from three types of APDs with a passive personal dosimetry system while being used in real clinical environment by the interventional staff. The results show that there is a large spread in the ratios of the passive and active devices.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31832653
pii: 5674029
doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncz253
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

22-29

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

F Vanhavere (F)

SCK-CEN, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, Mol, Belgium.

E Carinou (E)

Greek Atomic Energy Commission, EEAE, Agia Paraskevi, Attiki, Greece.

I Clairand (I)

IRSN, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safery, Fontenay-Aux-Roses, France.

O Ciraj-Bjelac (O)

Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

F De Monte (F)

Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.

J Domienik-Andrzejewska (J)

NIOM, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, Poland.

P Ferrari (P)

ENEA. IRP-Radiation Protection Institute, Bologna, Italy.

M Ginjaume (M)

UPC, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.

Hrvoje Hršak (H)

University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Croatia.

O Hupe (O)

Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), 38116 Braunschweig, Germany.

Z Knezevic (Z)

Ruder Boskovic Institute RBI, Zagreb, Croatia.

U O'Connor (U)

St. James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.

M Sans Merce (MS)

CHUV, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.

S Sarmento (S)

Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal.

A Savary (A)

IRSN, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safery, Fontenay-Aux-Roses, France.

T Siskoonen (T)

STUK, Helsinki, Finland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH