Influence of attachment bonding protocol on precision of the attachment in aligner treatments.

Einfluss des Attachment-Klebeprotokolls auf die Genauigkeit des Attachments bei Aligner-Behandlungen.
Dental bonding In vitro techniques Orthodontic appliances, removable Tooth movement techniques Viscosity

Journal

Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie
ISSN: 1615-6714
Titre abrégé: J Orofac Orthop
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9713484

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Historique:
received: 05 12 2018
accepted: 12 09 2019
pubmed: 14 12 2019
medline: 17 1 2020
entrez: 14 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Precise bonding of attachments in aligner treatment is crucial to achieve the intended tooth movement. Thus, we evaluated five different bonding protocols for attachments used in aligner treatments with the goal of identifying the most precise protocol. One ellipsoid and one rectangular attachment were exemplarily chosen and examined. All attachments were bonded using the same template aligner, which was produced by thermoforming. The bonding process was repeated 30 times with each protocol for statistical analysis. The protocols differed in the type of composite used (high viscous, low viscous), the additional application of a perforation in the attachment reservoir, and the use of a two-phase procedure with high viscous composite. All bonded attachments were laser scanned and compared to the attachments of a master model using a surface/surface matching algorithm to determine the precision, i.e., highest aberrations (maximum vertical distance) between the attachment of the master and results obtained from the various bonding protocols. Furthermore, the excessive amounts of composite bonded around the attachments were measured and compared. The two-phase procedure had a median aberration of 0.13 mm and a median amount of excessive composite of 7.40 mm In this in vitro study, the bonding protocol influenced the precision of bonded attachments. The bonding protocol with high viscous composite without a perforation in the attachment reservoir was the most inaccurate. The use of a low viscous composite or attachments made by a two-phase procedure with high viscous composite revealed more precise results.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31834419
doi: 10.1007/s00056-019-00204-7
pii: 10.1007/s00056-019-00204-7
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

30-40

Références

Angle Orthod. 2017 Nov;87(6):801-808
pubmed: 28753032
Angle Orthod. 2015 May;85(3):454-60
pubmed: 25181252
N Y State Dent J. 2014 Mar;80(2):11-4
pubmed: 24851387
Eur J Dent. 2015 Jul-Sep;9(3):404-410
pubmed: 26430371
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Jan;155(1):98-107
pubmed: 30591174
Angle Orthod. 2015 Nov;85(6):934-40
pubmed: 26516708
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Jun;145(6):728-36
pubmed: 24880843
Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2017 Aug;30(2):90-95
pubmed: 29248944
Prog Orthod. 2016;17:12
pubmed: 27041551
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2003 Oct-Dec;6(5-6):353-9
pubmed: 14675956
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(13):e0248
pubmed: 29595680
Dent Mater. 2007 Jan;23(1):51-9
pubmed: 16423384
J Clin Orthod. 1985 Aug;19(8):570-8
pubmed: 3862671
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Apr;151(4):691-699.e2
pubmed: 28364892
J Oral Rehabil. 1984 Sep;11(5):415-8
pubmed: 6594482
Aust Dent J. 2016 Sep;61(3):366-73
pubmed: 26573239
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jun;9(6):ZE18-24
pubmed: 26266238
J Conserv Dent. 2017 Nov-Dec;20(6):380-385
pubmed: 29430087
J Clin Orthod. 2016 Jun;50(6):341-7
pubmed: 27475935
J Orofac Orthop. 2015 May;76(3):240-50
pubmed: 25929710
BMC Oral Health. 2014 Jun 11;14:68
pubmed: 24923279
Aust Orthod J. 2016 May;32(1):82-7
pubmed: 27468595

Auteurs

Julia Weckmann (J)

Orthodontic practice, Mittelstraße 4, 53879, Euskirchen, Germany.

Sven Scharf (S)

Department of Orthodontics, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 32, 50931, Cologne, Germany. sven.scharf@uk-koeln.de.

Isabelle Graf (I)

Department of Orthodontics, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 32, 50931, Cologne, Germany.

Jörg Schwarze (J)

Orthodontic private practice, Richard-Wagner-Straße 9-11, 50674, Cologne, Germany.

Ludger Keilig (L)

Department of Oral Technology, University of Bonn, Welschnonnenstraße 17, 53111, Bonn, Germany.

Christoph Bourauel (C)

Department of Oral Technology, University of Bonn, Welschnonnenstraße 17, 53111, Bonn, Germany.

Bert Braumann (B)

Department of Orthodontics, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 32, 50931, Cologne, Germany.

Articles similaires

Characterization of 3D printed composite for final dental restorations.

Lucas Eigi Borges Tanaka, Camila da Silva Rodrigues, Manassés Tércio Vieira Grangeiro et al.
1.00
Composite Resins Materials Testing Printing, Three-Dimensional Surface Properties Flexural Strength
Humans Finite Element Analysis Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures Maxilla Tooth Movement Techniques

Bank vole genomics links determinate and indeterminate growth of teeth.

Zachary T Calamari, Andrew Song, Emily Cohen et al.
1.00
Animals Arvicolinae Genomics Mice Tooth

Biomimetic Restorative Dentistry: an evidence-based discussion of common myths.

Alessandra Reis, Victor Pinheiro Feitosa, Ana Cláudia Chibinski et al.
1.00
Humans Dental Restoration, Permanent Evidence-Based Dentistry Biomimetics Dental Caries

Classifications MeSH