Complications of Percutaneous Drainage in Step-Up Approach for Management of Pancreatic Necrosis: Experience of 10 Years from a Tertiary Care Center.
Bleeding complications
CT scan guidance
Infected pancreatic necrosis, Sterile pancreatic necrosis
Intestinal fistula
Necrotizing pancreatitis
Percutaneous catheter drainage
Pseudoaneurysms
Ultrasound guidance
Journal
Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract
ISSN: 1873-4626
Titre abrégé: J Gastrointest Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9706084
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2020
03 2020
Historique:
received:
20
05
2019
accepted:
06
11
2019
pubmed:
18
12
2019
medline:
15
4
2021
entrez:
18
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) as initial intervention in necrotizing pancreatitis has led to improved outcomes and obviated need for surgery in a significant proportion. However, there can be difficulty in accessing deep-seated necrotic collections by percutaneous catheter and complications are likely. The present study involves a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis managed by a step-up approach. All patients who underwent PCD were studied for catheter-related complications. A total of 707 PCD catheters were used in 314 patients (median 2, interquartile range IQR 1-3). The total number of interventions were 1194 (median 3, IQR 2-5). Enteric communication was seen in 8.9%, of which colonic fistula occurred in 71.4%, duodenal in 17.8%, and jejunal in 10.7% of patients. Majority (78.5%) of the fistulae were managed conservatively by withdrawal of the drain. Operative management was required in 30% of colonic and 40% of duodenal fistulae. Need for surgery, length of hospital stay, and mortality were not significantly different between patients with and without fistulae. Bleeding complications were seen in 7.3% of patients, out of which 34.7% were managed conservatively, 21.7% required angioembolization of pseudo-aneurysms, and 34.7% needed surgery. Patients with bleeding had significantly higher requirement for surgery and mechanical ventilation compared to those with no bleeding. There was no significant increase in hospital stay, ICU stay, and mortality. Hollow viscus and vascular injuries are important complications seen with catheter drainage of necrotic collections. Majority of patients with enteric communication were managed conservatively, with no added morbidity or mortality. Bleeding complications related to PCD had higher requirement for surgical intervention, but mortality rates remained similar to those of patients with no bleeding complications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31845144
doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04470-z
pii: 10.1007/s11605-019-04470-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
598-609Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2004 Nov-Dec;27(6):567-80
pubmed: 15578132
HPB (Oxford). 2016 Jan;18(1):49-56
pubmed: 26776851
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Apr;95(14):e3318
pubmed: 27057908
Gastroenterology. 2011 Oct;141(4):1254-63
pubmed: 21741922
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Apr;168(4):979-84
pubmed: 9124154
Ann Surg. 2000 Aug;232(2):175-80
pubmed: 10903593
Arch Surg. 2005 Oct;140(10):952-5
pubmed: 16230544
Ann Surg. 2013 Apr;257(4):737-50
pubmed: 22968079
Surgery. 2005 Jul;138(1):28-39
pubmed: 16003313
Radiographics. 2002 Mar-Apr;22(2):305-22
pubmed: 11896221
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1491-502
pubmed: 20410514
Arch Surg. 1995 Jan;130(1):48-52
pubmed: 7802576
Br J Surg. 2011 Jan;98(1):18-27
pubmed: 21136562
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 May;13(5):306-12
pubmed: 26956064
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Feb;75(2):436-40
pubmed: 22154413
Pancreatology. 2008;8(2):153-8
pubmed: 18382101
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993 Sep;177(3):215-22
pubmed: 8356492
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jul;199(1):192-9
pubmed: 22733912
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 2003;(239):111-6
pubmed: 14743893
Pancreas. 2003 Jan;26(1):8-14
pubmed: 12499910
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar 7;22(9):2828-36
pubmed: 26973421
Gut. 2013 Jan;62(1):102-11
pubmed: 23100216
Ann Surg. 2008 Feb;247(2):294-9
pubmed: 18216536
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct;101(10):2379-400
pubmed: 17032204
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Apr;170(4):969-75
pubmed: 9530046
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Jan;24(1):122-9
pubmed: 23176965
Gastroenterology. 1996 Sep;111(3):755-64
pubmed: 8780582
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Feb;16(2):248-56; discussion 256-7
pubmed: 22125167
Am J Surg. 1989 Dec;158(6):581-3; discussion 583-4
pubmed: 2589594
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec 14;18(46):6829-35
pubmed: 23239921
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2006 Jun;23(2):194-204
pubmed: 21326763