Cluster-randomised trial evaluating a complex intervention to improve mental health and well-being of employees working in hospital - a protocol for the SEEGEN trial.
Cluster-randomised controlled trial; waitlist control
Complex intervention
Health care workers
Hospital
Mental health
Well-being
Work-related psychological stress and strain
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Dec 2019
17 Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
11
10
2019
accepted:
07
11
2019
entrez:
19
12
2019
pubmed:
19
12
2019
medline:
5
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Health care employees in Germany and worldwide are exposed to a variety of stressors. However, most of the hospitals in Germany lack a systematic workplace health management. Thus, this study aims at the evaluation of the effects of a behavioural as well as organisational (´complex´) intervention on the mental health and well-being of hospital staff. Mental health in the hospital workplace (SEElische GEsundheit am Arbeitsplatz KrankeNhaus - SEEGEN) is an unblinded, multi-centred cluster-randomised open trial with two groups (intervention group (IG) and waitlist control group (CG)). Study participants in the intervention clusters will receive the complex intervention; study participants in the waitlist control clusters will receive the complex intervention after the last follow-up measurement. The intervention consists of five behavioural and organisational intervention modules that are specifically tailored to hospital employees at different hierarchical and functional levels. Hospital staff may select one specific module according to their position and specific needs or interests. Towards the end of the intervention roundtable discussions with representatives from all professional groups will be held to facilitate organisational change. Primary outcome is the change in emotional and cognitive strain in the working environment, from baseline (T0) to 6 month-follow up (T1), between IG and CG. In addition, employees who do not participate in the modules are included in the trial by answering shorter questionnaires (cluster participants). Furthermore, using mixed methods, a process evaluation will identify uptake of the intervention, and mediators and moderators of the effect. There seems to be growing psychological strain on people working in the health care sector worldwide. This study will examine whether investing directly in the hospital staff and their interpersonal relationship may lead to measurable benefits in subjective well-being at the workplace and improved economic performance indicators of the hospital. In case of a positive outcome, health promotion strategies looking at behavioural as well as organisational components within the hospital may gain additional importance, especially in regard of the growing financial pressure within the health sector. The SEEGEN study is registered at the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS) under the DRKS-ID DRKS00017249. Registered 08 October 2019, URL. https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00017249.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Health care employees in Germany and worldwide are exposed to a variety of stressors. However, most of the hospitals in Germany lack a systematic workplace health management. Thus, this study aims at the evaluation of the effects of a behavioural as well as organisational (´complex´) intervention on the mental health and well-being of hospital staff.
METHODS
METHODS
Mental health in the hospital workplace (SEElische GEsundheit am Arbeitsplatz KrankeNhaus - SEEGEN) is an unblinded, multi-centred cluster-randomised open trial with two groups (intervention group (IG) and waitlist control group (CG)). Study participants in the intervention clusters will receive the complex intervention; study participants in the waitlist control clusters will receive the complex intervention after the last follow-up measurement. The intervention consists of five behavioural and organisational intervention modules that are specifically tailored to hospital employees at different hierarchical and functional levels. Hospital staff may select one specific module according to their position and specific needs or interests. Towards the end of the intervention roundtable discussions with representatives from all professional groups will be held to facilitate organisational change. Primary outcome is the change in emotional and cognitive strain in the working environment, from baseline (T0) to 6 month-follow up (T1), between IG and CG. In addition, employees who do not participate in the modules are included in the trial by answering shorter questionnaires (cluster participants). Furthermore, using mixed methods, a process evaluation will identify uptake of the intervention, and mediators and moderators of the effect.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
There seems to be growing psychological strain on people working in the health care sector worldwide. This study will examine whether investing directly in the hospital staff and their interpersonal relationship may lead to measurable benefits in subjective well-being at the workplace and improved economic performance indicators of the hospital. In case of a positive outcome, health promotion strategies looking at behavioural as well as organisational components within the hospital may gain additional importance, especially in regard of the growing financial pressure within the health sector.
TRIAL REGISTRATION DRKS
UNASSIGNED
The SEEGEN study is registered at the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS) under the DRKS-ID DRKS00017249. Registered 08 October 2019, URL. https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00017249.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31847898
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7909-4
pii: 10.1186/s12889-019-7909-4
pmc: PMC6918673
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1694Investigateurs
Anja Greinacher
(A)
Kirsten Bikowski
(K)
Marieke Born
(M)
Antonia Drews
(A)
Lina Hermeling
(L)
Bernd Puschner
(B)
Elena Tsarouha
(E)
Lucia Jerg-Bretzke
(L)
Meinhard Kieser
(M)
Références
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2017 Apr;67(3-04):161-173
pubmed: 28403499
Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167-76
pubmed: 25831962
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012 Jan;85(1):67-79
pubmed: 21584721
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;(3):CD003541
pubmed: 20238322
Harv Bus Rev. 2003 Dec;81(12):46-54, 124
pubmed: 14712543
Stat Methods Med Res. 2007 Jun;16(3):219-42
pubmed: 17621469
Psychol Med. 2007 Aug;37(8):1131-40
pubmed: 17445281
J Ment Health Adm. 1991 Summer;18(2):148-53
pubmed: 10112337
Psychooncology. 2018 May;27(5):1426-1433
pubmed: 29314432
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 19;13(1):e0191000
pubmed: 29351310
Ann Epidemiol. 2004 Jan;14(1):24-30
pubmed: 14664776
Lancet. 2019 Jul 13;394(10193):93
pubmed: 31305255
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 07;(4):CD002892
pubmed: 25847433
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 03;10:622
pubmed: 31551829
Crit Care Nurse. 2017 Oct;37(5):e1-e9
pubmed: 28966203
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017 Jul 1;43(4):294-306
pubmed: 28306759
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7
pubmed: 23295957
BMC Public Health. 2015 Aug 01;15:738
pubmed: 26232123
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Sep;37(8):1810-23
pubmed: 23891906
Occup Environ Med. 2007 Oct;64(10):659-65
pubmed: 17259167
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009 Aug;82(8):1005-13
pubmed: 19018554
JAMA Surg. 2018 May 1;153(5):403-404
pubmed: 29516082