Smoking and outcomes following guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment in acute coronary syndrome patients: a substudy from the randomized TROPICAL-ACS trial.
Acute Coronary Syndrome
/ blood
Aged
Drug Administration Schedule
Drug Monitoring
Drug Substitution
Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy
/ adverse effects
Europe
Female
Hemorrhage
/ chemically induced
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Non-Smokers
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
/ adverse effects
Platelet Aggregation
/ drug effects
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Platelet Function Tests
Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists
/ administration & dosage
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Smokers
Smoking
/ adverse effects
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Acute coronary syndrome
Bleeding
Platelets
Smoking status
Thrombosis
Journal
European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy
ISSN: 2055-6845
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101669491
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2020
01 11 2020
Historique:
received:
01
10
2019
revised:
24
11
2019
accepted:
13
12
2019
pubmed:
20
12
2019
medline:
10
2
2021
entrez:
20
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Prior analyses disclosed variations in antiplatelet drug response and clinical outcomes between smokers and non-smokers, thus the safety and efficacy of any dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) de-escalation strategy may differ in relation to smoking status. Hence, we assessed the impact of smoking on clinical outcomes and adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation following guided de-escalation of DAPT in invasively managed acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. The multicentre TROPICAL-ACS trial randomized 2610 biomarker-positive ACS patients 1:1 to standard treatment with prasugrel for 12 months (control group) or a platelet function testing guided de-escalation of DAPT. Current smokers (n = 1182) showed comparable event rates between study groups [6.6% vs. 6.6%; hazard ratio (HR) 1.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-1.56, P > 0.99]. In non-smokers (n = 1428), a guided DAPT de-escalation was associated with a lower 1-year incidence of the primary endpoint [cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or bleeding ≥ Grade 2 according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria] compared with control group patients (7.9% vs. 11.0%; HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.50-0.99, P = 0.048). This reduction was mainly driven by a lower rate of BARC ≥ Grade 2 bleedings (5.2% vs. 7.7%; HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.45-1.03, P = 0.066). There was no significant interaction of smoking status with treatment effects of guided DAPT de-escalation (Pint = 0.23). Adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation values were higher in current smokers [median 28 U, interquartile range (IQR: 20-40)] vs. non-smoker [median 24 U (16-25), P < 0.0001] in the control group and in current smokers [median 42 U, IQR (27-68)] vs. non-smoker [median 37 U, IQR (25-55), P < 0.001] in the monitoring group. Guided DAPT de-escalation appears to be equally safe and effective in smokers and non-smokers. Regardless of smoking status and especially for those patients deemed unsuitable for 1 year of potent platelet inhibition this DAPT strategy might be used as an alternative antiplatelet treatment regimen.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31855244
pii: 5681356
doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz084
doi:
Substances chimiques
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
0
Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
372-381Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.