Is Piperacillin-Tazobactam Effective for the Treatment of Pyelonephritis Caused by Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Organisms?
ESBL
UTI
carbapenem
urinary tract infection
Journal
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
ISSN: 1537-6591
Titre abrégé: Clin Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9203213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 11 2020
05 11 2020
Historique:
received:
15
10
2019
accepted:
18
12
2019
pubmed:
21
12
2019
medline:
28
4
2021
entrez:
21
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Limited data exist regarding the efficacy of piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) for the management of nonbacteremic pyelonephritis caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing organisms. We conducted a multicenter observational study comparing clinical outcomes of adults hospitalized with ESBL-producing pyelonephritis who were receiving TZP versus carbapenems, using an inverse probability of treatment weighted propensity score analysis. Patients were eligible for inclusion if all of the following criteria were met: (1) urine cultures growing Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, or Proteus mirabilis at ≥50 000 colony-forming units/mL; (2) identification of an ESBL gene; (3) pyuria (≥10 white blood cells per high powered field in the urine); and (4) dysuria and fever plus at least 1 of the following symptoms: emesis, rigors, hypotension, or flank pain. There were 186 patients included in the propensity score-weighted cohort; 45 (24%) received TZP and 141 (76%) received a carbapenem. Of these 186 patients, 27% were admitted to the intensive care unit, 48% were immunocompromised, and 45% had underlying urologic abnormalities. There were no differences between the 2 groups in the proportion of patients (20% vs 25%) with recurrent cystitis or pyelonephritis with the same ESBL-producing organism within 30 days (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, .31-1.81; P = .52). There were no differences in the resolution of clinical symptoms by Day 7 or in 30-day mortality. There was 1 (2%) patient in the TZP arm and 11 (8%) patients in the carbapenem arm who had incident carbapenem-resistant organisms isolated within 30 days (P = .09). TZP may be a reasonable alternative to carbapenems for the management of ESBL-producing pyelonephritis and may mitigate the risk of emergence of carbapenem-resistant organisms, compared with carbapenem therapy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Limited data exist regarding the efficacy of piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) for the management of nonbacteremic pyelonephritis caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing organisms.
METHODS
We conducted a multicenter observational study comparing clinical outcomes of adults hospitalized with ESBL-producing pyelonephritis who were receiving TZP versus carbapenems, using an inverse probability of treatment weighted propensity score analysis. Patients were eligible for inclusion if all of the following criteria were met: (1) urine cultures growing Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, or Proteus mirabilis at ≥50 000 colony-forming units/mL; (2) identification of an ESBL gene; (3) pyuria (≥10 white blood cells per high powered field in the urine); and (4) dysuria and fever plus at least 1 of the following symptoms: emesis, rigors, hypotension, or flank pain.
RESULTS
There were 186 patients included in the propensity score-weighted cohort; 45 (24%) received TZP and 141 (76%) received a carbapenem. Of these 186 patients, 27% were admitted to the intensive care unit, 48% were immunocompromised, and 45% had underlying urologic abnormalities. There were no differences between the 2 groups in the proportion of patients (20% vs 25%) with recurrent cystitis or pyelonephritis with the same ESBL-producing organism within 30 days (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, .31-1.81; P = .52). There were no differences in the resolution of clinical symptoms by Day 7 or in 30-day mortality. There was 1 (2%) patient in the TZP arm and 11 (8%) patients in the carbapenem arm who had incident carbapenem-resistant organisms isolated within 30 days (P = .09).
CONCLUSIONS
TZP may be a reasonable alternative to carbapenems for the management of ESBL-producing pyelonephritis and may mitigate the risk of emergence of carbapenem-resistant organisms, compared with carbapenem therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31859352
pii: 5681794
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1205
pmc: PMC7643734
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination
157044-21-8
beta-Lactamases
EC 3.5.2.6
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e331-e337Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : K23 AI127935
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Jun;50(6):2244-7
pubmed: 16723596
Infect Drug Resist. 2019 Feb 20;12:461-468
pubmed: 30863128
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;38(10):1209-1215
pubmed: 28758612
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Oct 30;65(10):1615-1623
pubmed: 29020250
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Dec 1;61(11):1655-61
pubmed: 26270684
Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Jun 15;151(12):1194-205
pubmed: 10905532
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jun 7;17(1):404
pubmed: 28592240
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000 Jun;45(6):895-8
pubmed: 10837447
BMC Geriatr. 2014 Mar 13;14:30
pubmed: 24625344
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 May 1;60(9):1319-25
pubmed: 25586681
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Jun 20;60(7):4159-69
pubmed: 27139473
J Urol. 2004 Feb;171(2 Pt 1):734-9
pubmed: 14713799
Int J Infect Dis. 2014 Dec;29:91-5
pubmed: 25461239
Am Fam Physician. 2005 Mar 1;71(5):933-42
pubmed: 15768623
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2014 Mar;28(1):1-13
pubmed: 24484571
Med Mal Infect. 2015 May;45(5):169-72
pubmed: 25845927
Lancet Infect Dis. 2008 Mar;8(3):159-66
pubmed: 18291338
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Oct;69(10):2848-56
pubmed: 24928854
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Sep;55(6):771-7
pubmed: 22677710
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Mar 1;52(5):e103-20
pubmed: 21292654
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019 Jul;54(1):62-68
pubmed: 31034938
Scand J Infect Dis. 2001;33(5):339-43
pubmed: 11440218
Am J Med. 2017 Jul;130(7):842-845
pubmed: 28216442
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Jul;79(3):367-72
pubmed: 24813688
Urology. 2008 Jan;71(1):17-22
pubmed: 18242357
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;37(1):49-54
pubmed: 26458226
JAMA. 2018 Sep 11;320(10):984-994
pubmed: 30208454
JAMA. 2000 Mar 22-29;283(12):1583-90
pubmed: 10735395
Infection. 2018 Aug;46(4):495-501
pubmed: 29748840
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017 Apr;49(4):410-415
pubmed: 28263710
Infection. 2011 Aug;39(4):333-40
pubmed: 21706226
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 23;6(3):ofz027
pubmed: 30863785
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Apr 1;64(7):972-980
pubmed: 28362938
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Jun;71(6):1672-80
pubmed: 26907184
Clin Infect Dis. 1996 Jan;22(1):91-9
pubmed: 8824972
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(2):833-8
pubmed: 24247134
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 May 1;72(5):1496-1501
pubmed: 28158526