Measurement errors in serial echocardiographic assessments of aortic valve stenosis severity.
Aortic Valve
/ diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve Stenosis
/ diagnostic imaging
Databases, Factual
Echocardiography, Doppler, Color
Echocardiography, Doppler, Pulsed
Heart Ventricles
/ diagnostic imaging
Hemodynamics
Humans
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Severity of Illness Index
Time Factors
Ventricular Function, Left
Aortic stenosis
Doppler echocardiography
Left ventricular outflow tract
Valvular heart disease
Journal
The international journal of cardiovascular imaging
ISSN: 1875-8312
Titre abrégé: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100969716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
21
09
2019
accepted:
03
12
2019
pubmed:
23
12
2019
medline:
23
6
2020
entrez:
23
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) evaluation of aortic stenosis (AS) is routinely performed using the continuity equation. Inaccurate measurements of the left ventricular (LV) outflow tract (LVOT) diameter are considered the most common source of error in AS grading. We hypothesized that inconsistency in LVOT velocity time integral (VTI) is an under-recognized cause of AS assessment error. We sought to determine which parameters contribute most towards inconsistencies in AS grading by studying the prevalence of different errors in a historic cohort. We identified patients with mild to severe AS with multiple studies from our database from 1994 to 2018 (n = 988 patients, 2859 studies). Errors were defined when: (1) LVOT diameter changed by > 2 mm, (2) LVOT VTI changed by > 15% without change in LV function from the initial TTE, (3) aortic valve (AV) maximum velocity (Vmax), mean pressure gradient (ΔP) or AV VTI decreased by > 15% without change in LV function from prior study. The most common error was the LVOT VTI measurement with 22% prevalence. LVOT diameter, AV VTI, AV Vmax and AV ΔP measurement caused errors in < 7% studies. Patients with normal LV function and more severe AS were more likely to have LVOT VTI errors (P < 0.05). LVOT VTI is a frequent, under-recognized source of error in assessing AS. Greater attention should be directed toward the proper positioning of the pulsed Doppler sample volume, particularly in patients with higher grades of AS and normal systolic function, to ensure accurate and reproducible assessment of AS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31865497
doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01745-z
pii: 10.1007/s10554-019-01745-z
pmc: PMC7135919
mid: NIHMS1565675
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
471-479Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HL007381
Pays : United States
Références
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 Jan;30(1):28-35
pubmed: 27887818
Am J Cardiol. 1985 Dec 1;56(15):989-93
pubmed: 4072934
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Nov;28(11):1259-66
pubmed: 26307374
Am Heart J. 1951 Jan;41(1):1-29
pubmed: 14799435
Am Heart J. 1996 Aug;132(2 Pt 1):408-17
pubmed: 8701905
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1993 May-Jun;6(3 Pt 1):279-85
pubmed: 8333976
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Dec;6(6):1306-14
pubmed: 3905918
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012 Jul;25(7):749-57
pubmed: 22613774
Acad Radiol. 2012 Oct;19(10):1252-9
pubmed: 22854005
Eur Heart J. 1991 Jan;12(1):10-4
pubmed: 2009886
Circ J. 2010 Nov;74(12):2649-57
pubmed: 21084759
Br Heart J. 1980 Mar;43(3):284-92
pubmed: 7437175
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 Apr;30(4):372-392
pubmed: 28385280
Physiol Rep. 2017 Apr;5(8):
pubmed: 28438984
Am Heart J. 1979 Dec;98(6):689-700
pubmed: 495418
Heart. 2013 Jul;99(13):921-31
pubmed: 23349350
Circulation. 1985 Oct;72(4):810-8
pubmed: 3896562
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;8(3):248-57
pubmed: 25772832
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Jun;11(6):1227-34
pubmed: 3366997
Heart. 2013 Mar;99(6):396-400
pubmed: 22942293