Protons in small spaces: Discrete simulations of vesicle acidification.


Journal

PLoS computational biology
ISSN: 1553-7358
Titre abrégé: PLoS Comput Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101238922

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2019
Historique:
received: 24 05 2019
accepted: 11 11 2019
revised: 07 01 2020
pubmed: 24 12 2019
medline: 17 3 2020
entrez: 24 12 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The lumenal pH of an organelle is one of its defining characteristics and central to its biological function. Experiments have elucidated many of the key pH regulatory elements and how they vary from compartment-to-compartment, and continuum mathematical models have played an important role in understanding how these elements (proton pumps, counter-ion fluxes, membrane potential, buffering capacity, etc.) work together to achieve specific pH setpoints. While continuum models have proven successful in describing ion regulation at the cellular length scale, it is unknown if they are valid at the subcellular level where volumes are small, ion numbers may fluctuate wildly, and biochemical heterogeneity is large. Here, we create a discrete, stochastic (DS) model of vesicular acidification to answer this question. We used this simplified model to analyze pH measurements of isolated vesicles containing single proton pumps and compared these results to solutions from a continuum, ordinary differential equations (ODE)-based model. Both models predict similar parameter estimates for the mean proton pumping rate, membrane permeability, etc., but, as expected, the ODE model fails to report on the fluctuations in the system. The stochastic model predicts that pH fluctuations decrease during acidification, but noise analysis of single-vesicle data confirms our finding that the experimental noise is dominated by the fluorescent dye, and it reveals no insight into the true noise in the proton fluctuations. Finally, we again use the reduced DS model explore the acidification of large, lysosome-like vesicles to determine how stochastic elements, such as variations in proton-pump copy number and cycling between on and off states, impact the pH setpoint and fluctuations around this setpoint.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31869334
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007539
pii: PCOMPBIOL-D-19-00836
pmc: PMC6946529
doi:

Substances chimiques

Buffers 0
Fluorescent Dyes 0
Proton Pumps 0
Protons 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e1007539

Subventions

Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG057342
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB017268
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R21 GM100224
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R56 AG057342
Pays : United States

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Pflugers Arch. 2009 Jan;457(3):589-98
pubmed: 18026982
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008 Dec;15(12):1263-71
pubmed: 19011635
Biophys J. 2008 Aug;95(3):1176-88
pubmed: 18424503
Biophys J. 2000 Jun;78(6):2798-813
pubmed: 10827963
Nat Genet. 2002 May;31(1):69-73
pubmed: 11967532
Nature. 2000 Nov 16;408(6810):369-73
pubmed: 11099045
J Gen Physiol. 2001 Apr;117(4):329-44
pubmed: 11279253
J Biol Chem. 2001 Aug 31;276(35):33027-35
pubmed: 11402049
J Gen Physiol. 2013 Jun;141(6):705-20
pubmed: 23712550
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Jun 6;104(6):1127-1138
pubmed: 31155284
Nature. 2006 Apr 27;440(7088):1213-6
pubmed: 16554753
Methods Mol Biol. 2009;500:17-59
pubmed: 19399433
Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Dec;18(12):7064-74
pubmed: 9819393
Nature. 2008 Jun 5;453(7196):788-92
pubmed: 18449189
Am J Physiol. 1994 Jan;266(1 Pt 1):C81-94
pubmed: 8304433
Cell. 2005 Jul 29;122(2):169-82
pubmed: 16051143
Science. 2004 Jun 18;304(5678):1811-4
pubmed: 15166317
Science. 2016 Mar 25;351(6280):1469-73
pubmed: 27013734
J Cell Biol. 2016 Mar 14;212(6):677-92
pubmed: 26975849
Nat Nanotechnol. 2009 May;4(5):325-30
pubmed: 19421220
Nat Cell Biol. 2011 Apr;13(4):453-60
pubmed: 21394080
Science. 2016 Feb 26;351(6276):981-4
pubmed: 26912364
J Cell Biol. 2010 Jun 28;189(7):1171-86
pubmed: 20566682
Science. 2010 Jun 11;328(5984):1401-3
pubmed: 20430974
Cell. 2006 Nov 17;127(4):831-46
pubmed: 17110340
Neuron. 2010 Mar 11;65(5):643-56
pubmed: 20223200
Biophys J. 1997 Aug;73(2):674-87
pubmed: 9251786
Bone. 2016 Dec;93:167-180
pubmed: 27650914
Science. 2006 Apr 28;312(5773):589-92
pubmed: 16556803

Auteurs

Apeksha Singh (A)

College of Letters and Science, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

Frank V Marcoline (FV)

Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

Salome Veshaguri (S)

Bionanotecnology and Nanomedicine Laboratory, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nano-Science Center, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lundbeck Foundation Center Biomembranes in Nanomedicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Aimee W Kao (AW)

Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

Marcel Bruchez (M)

Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Department of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Molecular Biosensor and Imaging Center, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Joseph A Mindell (JA)

Membrane Transport Biophysics Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.

Dimitrios Stamou (D)

Bionanotecnology and Nanomedicine Laboratory, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nano-Science Center, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lundbeck Foundation Center Biomembranes in Nanomedicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Michael Grabe (M)

Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

Articles similaires

Photosynthesis Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase Carbon Dioxide Molecular Dynamics Simulation Cyanobacteria
Aspergillus Hydrogen-Ion Concentration Coculture Techniques Secondary Metabolism Streptomyces rimosus
Humans Meta-Analysis as Topic Sample Size Models, Statistical Computer Simulation
Adenosine Triphosphate Adenosine Diphosphate Mitochondrial ADP, ATP Translocases Binding Sites Mitochondria

Classifications MeSH