Neutrophils remain detrimentally active in hydroxyurea-treated patients with sickle cell disease.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anemia, Sickle Cell
/ blood
Antisickling Agents
/ therapeutic use
Case-Control Studies
Cell Degranulation
/ drug effects
Cells, Cultured
Extracellular Traps
/ metabolism
Female
Humans
Hydroxyurea
/ therapeutic use
Male
Middle Aged
Neutrophils
/ drug effects
Peroxidase
/ metabolism
Primary Cell Culture
Young Adult
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
11
07
2019
accepted:
28
11
2019
entrez:
24
12
2019
pubmed:
24
12
2019
medline:
16
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Neutrophilia is a feature of sickle cell disease (SCD) that has been consistently correlated with clinical severity and has been shown to remain highly activated even at steady state. In addition to induction of fetal hemoglobin (HbF), hydroxyurea (HU) leads to reduction in neutrophil count and their adhesion properties, which contributes to the clinical efficacy of HU in SCD. Although HU reduces the frequency and severity of acute vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs) and chest syndrome, HU therapy does not abolish these acute clinical events. In this study we investigated whether neutrophils in SCD patients whilst on HU therapy retained features of detrimental pro-inflammatory activity. Freshly isolated neutrophils from SCD patients on HU therapy at steady state and from ethnic-matched healthy controls were evaluated ex vivo for their degranulation response and production of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Unstimulated SCD patient neutrophils already produced NETs within 30 minutes, compared to none for healthy neutrophils, and by 4 hours, these neutrophils produced significantly more NETs than the control neutrophils (P = 0.0079**). Higher numbers of neutrophils from SCD patients also showed higher degree of degranulation-related intracellular features compared to healthy neutrophils, including rough-textured cellular membranes (P = 0.03*), double-positivity for F-Actin and CD63 (P = 0.02*) and re-located CD63 within cytoplasm more efficiently than their healthy counterparts (P = 0.02*). The neutrophils from SCD donors released more myeloperoxidase (P = 0.02*) in the absence of any trigger. Our data showed that neutrophils from patients with SCD at steady state remained active during hydroxyurea treatment and are likely to be able to contribute to the SCD pro-inflammatory environment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31869367
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226583
pii: PONE-D-19-19560
pmc: PMC6927657
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antisickling Agents
0
Peroxidase
EC 1.11.1.7
Hydroxyurea
X6Q56QN5QC
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0226583Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Oct;67(10):2780-90
pubmed: 26097236
Blood. 2002 Apr 1;99(7):2297-303
pubmed: 11895759
Blood. 2019 May 16;133(20):2178-2185
pubmed: 30898862
Thorax. 2016 Nov;71(11):1030-1038
pubmed: 27581620
Medicine (Baltimore). 1996 Nov;75(6):300-26
pubmed: 8982148
Nat Commun. 2015 Mar 26;6:6673
pubmed: 25809117
Trends Immunol. 2019 Mar;40(3):228-242
pubmed: 30777721
Blood. 2014 Jun 12;123(24):3818-27
pubmed: 24620350
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 7;107(36):15880-5
pubmed: 20798043
J Crit Care. 2014 Dec;29(6):1133.e1-5
pubmed: 25128442
J Immunol. 2013 Feb 1;190(3):1217-26
pubmed: 23267025
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2006 Sep 15;2(3):98-108
pubmed: 20525154
Blood. 2017 Mar 9;129(10):1357-1367
pubmed: 28073784
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 29;14(4):e0216055
pubmed: 31034495
J Cell Biol. 2010 Nov 1;191(3):677-91
pubmed: 20974816
Nat Med. 2016 Feb;22(2):146-53
pubmed: 26779811
Cell Tissue Res. 2018 Mar;371(3):531-539
pubmed: 29383445
Cell Rep. 2014 Aug 7;8(3):883-96
pubmed: 25066128
Hematology. 2010 Dec;15(6):422-9
pubmed: 21114906
Circ Res. 2017 Oct 13;121(9):1092-1101
pubmed: 28794054
Thromb Haemost. 2014 Oct;112(4):659-65
pubmed: 25265341
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2018 Aug 31;19:113-147
pubmed: 29641911
Blood. 2013 Dec 5;122(24):3892-8
pubmed: 24052549
J Leukoc Biol. 1999 Sep;66(3):411-5
pubmed: 10496310
JCI Insight. 2017 Jan 12;2(1):e89761
pubmed: 28097236
J Blood Med. 2017 Oct 25;8:185-191
pubmed: 29123434
Arthritis Res Ther. 2014 Jun 13;16(3):R122
pubmed: 24928093
Front Immunol. 2019 Jan 11;9:3007
pubmed: 30687301
Nat Med. 2007 Apr;13(4):463-9
pubmed: 17384648
Front Immunol. 2014 Sep 19;5:448
pubmed: 25285096
J Clin Invest. 2012 Jul;122(7):2661-71
pubmed: 22684106
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Oct;73(10):1854-63
pubmed: 23873874
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2013 Sep;2(7):379-388
pubmed: 24527354
Science. 2015 Jul 17;349(6245):316-20
pubmed: 26185250
Blood. 2016 Feb 18;127(7):801-9
pubmed: 26758915
Cell Commun Signal. 2018 May 29;16(1):24
pubmed: 29843771
Microbes Infect. 2003 Nov;5(14):1317-27
pubmed: 14613775
Diabetes. 2014 Dec;63(12):4239-48
pubmed: 25092677