Clinical characteristics of interim-PET negative patients with a positive end PET from the prospective HD08-01 FIL study.


Journal

Annals of hematology
ISSN: 1432-0584
Titre abrégé: Ann Hematol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9107334

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Historique:
received: 15 04 2019
accepted: 06 12 2019
pubmed: 25 12 2019
medline: 30 1 2020
entrez: 25 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

FDG-positron emission tomography (PET) performed early during therapy in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma patients has been confirmed as being important for progression-free survival. A group of patients with a negative interim-PET (i-PET) showed a positive end induction PET (e-PET). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients with a positive e-PET as a secondary end point of the HD0801 study. A total of 519 patients with advanced-stage de novo Hodgkin lymphoma received initial treatment and underwent an i-PET. Patients with negative results continued the standard treatment. i-PET negative patients were then evaluated for response with an e-PET and those patients found to have a positive one were also then given a salvage therapy. Among 409 i-PET negative, 16 interrupted the therapy, 393 patients were evaluated with an e-PET, and 39 were positive. Sixteen out of 39 underwent a diagnostic biopsy and 15 were confirmed as HD. Seventeen out of 39 e-PET were reviewed according to the Deauville Score and, in sixteen, it was confirmed positive (10 DS 5, 6 DS 4). With the exception of high LDH value at diagnosis (p = 0.01; HR 95% CI 1.18-4.89), no clinical characteristics were significantly different in comparison with e-PET negative patients. Positive e-PET after a negative i-PET has a worse outcome when compared with i-PET positive patients salvaged with therapy intensification. It was not possible to identify clinical characteristics associated with a positive e-PET.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31872361
doi: 10.1007/s00277-019-03889-3
pii: 10.1007/s00277-019-03889-3
doi:

Substances chimiques

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 0Z5B2CJX4D
Bleomycin 11056-06-7
Vinblastine 5V9KLZ54CY
Dacarbazine 7GR28W0FJI
Doxorubicin 80168379AG

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Comparative Study Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

283-291

Références

Hasenclever D, Diehl V (1998) A prognostic score for advanced Hodgkin’s disease: International Prognostic Factors Project on advanced Hodgkin’s disease. N Engl J Med 339:1506–1514
doi: 10.1056/NEJM199811193392104
Terasawa T, Lau J, Bardet S et al (2009) Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for interim response assessment of advanced-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A systemic review. J Clin Oncol 27:1906–1914
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.0861
Hutchings M, Loft A, Hansen M et al (2006) FDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and progression-free survival in Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 107:52–59
doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-06-2252
Gallamini A, Rigacci L, Merli F et al (2006) The predictive value of positron emission tomography scanning performed after two courses of standard therapy on treatment outcome in advanced stage Hodgkin’s disease. Haematologica 91:475–481
pubmed: 16585014
Zinzani PL, Tani M, Fanti S et al (2006) Early positron emission tomography (PET) restaging: a predictive final response in Hodgkin’s disease patients. Ann Oncol 17:1296–1300
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl122
Gallamini A, Hutchings M, Rigacci L et al (2007) Early interim 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography is prognostically superior to international prognostic score in advanced-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a report from a joint Italian-Danish study. J Clin Oncol 25:3746–3752
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.6525
Zinzani PL, Rigacci L, Stefoni V et al (2012) Early interim 18F-FDG PET in Hodgkin’s lymphoma: evaluation on 304 patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39:4–12
doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1916-8
Viviani S, Zinzani PL, Rambaldi A et al (2011) ABVD versus BEACOPP for Hodgkin’s lymphoma when high-dose salvage is planned. N Engl J Med 365:203–212
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1100340
Mounier N, Brice P, Bologna S et al (2014) ABVD (8 cycles) versus BEACOPP (4 escalated cycles > 4 baseline): final results in stage III-IV low-risk Hodgkin lymphoma (IPS 0-2) of the LYSA H34 randomized trial. Ann Oncol 25:1622–1628
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu189
Eichenauer DA, Becker I, Monsef I et al (2017) Secondary malignant neoplasms, progression-free survival and overall survival in patients treated for Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Haematologica 102(10):1748–1757. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2017.167478
doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.167478 pubmed: 28912173 pmcid: 5622859
Behringer K, Mueller H, Goergen H et al (2013) (2012) Gonadal function and fertility in survivors after Hodgkin lymphoma treatment within the German Hodgkin Study Group HD13 to HD15 trials. J Clin Oncol 31(2):231–239. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.44.3721
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.3721 pubmed: 23150709
Borchmann P, Goergen H, Kobe C et al (2018) PET-guided treatment in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HD18): final results of an open-label, international, randomised phase 3 trial by the German Hodgkin Study Group. Lancet 390(10114):2790–2802. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32134-7
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32134-7 pubmed: 29061295
Gallamini A, Patti C, Viviani S et al (2011) Early chemotherapy intensification with BEACOPP in advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma patients with a interim-PET positive after two ABVD courses. Br J Haematol 152:551–560
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08485.x
Dann EJ, Blumenfeld Z, Bar-Shalom R et al (2012) A 10-year experience with treatment of high and standard risk Hodgkin disease: six cycles of tailored BEACOPP, with interim scintigraphy, are effective and female fertility is preserved. Am J Hematol 87:32–36
doi: 10.1002/ajh.22187
Radford J, Illidge T, Counsell N et al (2015) Results of a trial of PET-directed therapy for early-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 372(17):1598–1607
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408648
André MPE, Girinsky T, Federico M et al (2017) Early positron emission tomography response-adapted treatment in stage I and II HodgkinLymphoma: final results of the randomized EORTC/LYSA/FIL H10 trial. J Clin Oncol 35(16):1786–1794
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.6394
Borchmann P, Haverkamp H, Lohri A et al (2017) Progression-free survival of early interim PET-positive patients with advanced stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma treated with BEACOPPescalated alone or in combination with rituximab (HD18): an open-label, international, randomised phase 3 study by the German Hodgkin Study Group. Lancet Oncol 18(4):454–463
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30103-1
Gallamini A, Tarella C, Viviani S et al (2018) Early chemotherapy intensification with escalated BEACOPP in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma with a positive interim positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan after two ABVD cycles: long-term results of the GITIL/FIL HD 0607 trial. J Clin Oncol 36(5):454–462
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.2543
Zinzani PL, Broccoli A, Gioia DM et al (2016) Interim positron emission tomography response-adapted therapy in advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: final results of the phase II part of the HD0801 study. J Clin Oncol 34(12):1376–1385
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0699
Johnson P, Federico M, Kirkwood A et al (2016) Adapted treatment guided by interim PET-CT scan in advanced Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 374(25):2419–2429
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510093
Press OW, Li H, Schoder H et al (2016) US Intergroup trial of response-adapted therapy for stage III to IV Hodgkin lymphoma using early interim fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomognraphy imaging: Southwest Oncology Group S0816. J Clin Oncol 34(17):2020–2027
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.1119
Juweid ME, Stroobants S, Hoekstra OS et al (2007) Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 25(5):571–578
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.2305
Gallamini A, Barrington SF, Biggi A et al (2014) The predictive role of interim positron emission tomography for Hodgkin lymphoma treatment outcome is confirmed using the interpretation criteria of the Deauville five-point scale. Haematologica 99(6):1107–1113
doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.103218
Skoetz N, Trelle S, Rancea M et al (2013) Effect of initial treatment strategy on survival of patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 14:943–952
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70341-3
Mesguich C, Cazeau AL, Bouabdallah K et al (2016) Hodgkin lymphoma: a negative interim-PET cannot circumvent the need for end-of-treatment-PET evaluation. Br J Haematol 175(4):652–660
doi: 10.1111/bjh.14292
Kobe C, Dietlein M, Franklin J et al (2008) Positron emission tomography has a high negative predictive value for progression or early relapse for patients with residual disease after first-line chemotherapy in advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 112(10):3989–3994
doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-06-155820
Barnes JA, LaCasce AS, Zukotynski K et al (2011) End-of-treatment but not interim PET scan predicts outcome in nonbulky limited-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ann Oncol 22(4):910–915
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq549
Cheson BD (2007) The International Harmonization Project for response criteria in lymphoma clinical trials. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am Rev 21(5):841–854
doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2007.06.011
Barrington SF, Kirkwood AA, Franceschetto A et al (2016) PET-CT for staging and early response: results from the response-adapted therapy in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma study. Blood 127(12):1531–1538
doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-11-679407
Armand P, Engert A, Younes A et al (2018) Nivolumab for relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma after failure of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation: extended follow-up of the multicohort single-arm phase II CheckMate 205 trial. J Clin Oncol 36(14):1428–1439
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.0793

Auteurs

Luigi Rigacci (L)

Department of Hematology, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy. luigi.rigacci@unifi.it.
Hematology Unit and Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, AO San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy. luigi.rigacci@unifi.it.

Benedetta Puccini (B)

Department of Hematology, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.

Alessandro Broccoli (A)

Institute of Hematology "L. e A. Seràgnoli", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Manjola Dona (M)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ospedale Santo Stefano, Prato, Italy.

Manuel Gotti (M)

Policlinico San Matteo Pavia Fondazione, IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.

Andrea Evangelista (A)

Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, AO Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino and FIL Secretary, Turin, Italy.

Armando Santoro (A)

Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy.

Maurizio Bonfichi (M)

Policlinico San Matteo Pavia Fondazione, IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.

Alessandro Re (A)

Department of Hematology, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.

Michele Spina (M)

Oncology Centre of Reference, Aviano, Italy.

Barbara Botto (B)

Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.

Alessandro Pulsoni (A)

Institute of Haematology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.

Chiara Pagani (C)

Department of Hematology, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.

Caterina Stelitano (C)

Hematology Ospedale Bianchi Melacrino Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy.

Flavia Salvi (F)

Division of Hematology, A.O. SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.

Luca Nassi (L)

Division of Hematology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.

Lara Mannelli (L)

Department of Hematology, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.

Sofia Kovalchuk (S)

Department of Hematology, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.

Daniela Gioia (D)

Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, AO Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino and FIL Secretary, Turin, Italy.

Pier Luigi Zinzani (PL)

Institute of Hematology "L. e A. Seràgnoli", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH