Same-sex twins have a high incidence of congenital hypothyroidism and a high probability to be missed at newborn screening.


Journal

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry
ISSN: 1873-3492
Titre abrégé: Clin Chim Acta
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 1302422

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Historique:
received: 13 08 2019
revised: 20 12 2019
accepted: 20 12 2019
pubmed: 27 12 2019
medline: 2 10 2020
entrez: 27 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We estimated the incidence of CH in twins, analyse the clinical features of CH cases in twins and further evaluate the CH screening strategy and recall procedures for twins. A retrospective investigation of the screening results and confirmed cases in 724,791 newborns was conducted from 2015 to 2017 in Guangzhou. Clinical features were compared between twins with CH and singletons with CH. In addition, the twins were further divided into same-sex twins and different-sex twins to analyse the characteristics and incidence of CH and to compare differences in the confirmed cases in the 2 groups. The incidence of CH in same-sex twins was 1/593, which was much higher than the incidence of CH in singletons (1/1323) and different-sex twins (1/3060). Of the 20 twins diagnosed with CH, 17 were same-sex twins and 3 were different-sex twins. Among the six pairs of same-sex twins with CH, four had TSH inconsistency, which reached 67%. Eight of the 17 cases of same-sex twins diagnosed with CH had negative results at the first screening. Distinguishing same-sex twins from different-sex twins during newborn screening is more feasible. The incidence of CH in same-sex twins is much higher than that in the general population and the risk of transient CH is relatively high. In positive cases in same-sex twins, the simultaneous recall of the twin can effectively avoid a missed diagnosis. The screening center should properly evaluate the recall strategy and screening procedure for twins, especially twins of the same-sex.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
We estimated the incidence of CH in twins, analyse the clinical features of CH cases in twins and further evaluate the CH screening strategy and recall procedures for twins.
METHODS METHODS
A retrospective investigation of the screening results and confirmed cases in 724,791 newborns was conducted from 2015 to 2017 in Guangzhou. Clinical features were compared between twins with CH and singletons with CH. In addition, the twins were further divided into same-sex twins and different-sex twins to analyse the characteristics and incidence of CH and to compare differences in the confirmed cases in the 2 groups.
RESULTS RESULTS
The incidence of CH in same-sex twins was 1/593, which was much higher than the incidence of CH in singletons (1/1323) and different-sex twins (1/3060). Of the 20 twins diagnosed with CH, 17 were same-sex twins and 3 were different-sex twins. Among the six pairs of same-sex twins with CH, four had TSH inconsistency, which reached 67%. Eight of the 17 cases of same-sex twins diagnosed with CH had negative results at the first screening.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Distinguishing same-sex twins from different-sex twins during newborn screening is more feasible. The incidence of CH in same-sex twins is much higher than that in the general population and the risk of transient CH is relatively high. In positive cases in same-sex twins, the simultaneous recall of the twin can effectively avoid a missed diagnosis. The screening center should properly evaluate the recall strategy and screening procedure for twins, especially twins of the same-sex.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31877299
pii: S0009-8981(19)32187-4
doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.12.018
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

111-115

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Auteurs

Xiang Jiang (X)

Guangzhou Newborn Screening Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, PR China.

Yong-Lan Huang (YL)

Guangzhou Newborn Screening Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, PR China. Electronic address: xxhuang321@163.com.

Yi Feng (Y)

Guangzhou Newborn Screening Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, PR China.

Fang Tang (F)

Guangzhou Newborn Screening Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, PR China.

Xue-Fang Jia (XF)

Guangzhou Newborn Screening Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, PR China.

Qian-Yu Chen (QY)

Guangzhou Newborn Screening Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, PR China.

Cheng-Fang Tang (CF)

Guangzhou Newborn Screening Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, PR China.

Si-Chi Liu (SC)

Guangzhou Newborn Screening Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, PR China.

Bei Li (B)

Guangzhou Newborn Screening Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, PR China.

Rui-Dan Zheng (RD)

Guangzhou Newborn Screening Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, PR China.

Ji-Lian Liu (JL)

Guangzhou Newborn Screening Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, PR China.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH