Indigenous Land and Sea Management Programs (ILSMPs) Enhance the Wellbeing of Indigenous Australians.
Indigenous land and sea management programs
country
environment
impact evaluation
wellbeing
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 12 2019
23 12 2019
Historique:
received:
07
10
2019
revised:
24
11
2019
accepted:
20
12
2019
entrez:
28
12
2019
pubmed:
28
12
2019
medline:
21
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Conservation and environmental management have been reported as offering opportunities to substantially improve the wellbeing of Indigenous people. Using the holistic wellbeing impact evaluation (W-IE) approach-well suited for use in Indigenous communities-we interviewed 190 Indigenous Australians across four communities. All communities were involved in the Indigenous land and sea management programs (ILSMPs). Our study explored the conceptualisation of 'wellbeing' by participants. In particular, we were interested in the aspects of wellbeing perceived to be affected by ILSMPs. Out of the 26 wellbeing factors explored, 'Health centres'; 'Language'; 'Schools'; and 'Safe community' emerged as being of highest importance to the largest percentage of the respondents. When grouped using principle components analysis (PCA), the 'Community and society' domain emerged as the most important; accounting for 52% of the overall importance of all wellbeing factors. The second most important domain was the 'Country and culture', contributing 31%. Lastly, 'Economic aspects' contributed only 17%. Respondents believed that ILSMPs have played a considerable causal role in improving wellbeing, by positively changing factors most important to them. Specifically, 73% of perceived causal links were related to improvements in the 'Country and Culture' and 23% to 'Community and Society' domain. We thus conclude that land management for Indigenous people is much more than ecological or environmental management with ILSMPs, perceived to cause a wide range of cultural and social benefits. We also propose ways in which the future design of such programs could be improved to further increase benefits.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31878049
pii: ijerph17010125
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010125
pmc: PMC6981778
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Jul 31;9:132
pubmed: 19643031
Lancet. 2006 Jun 17;367(9527):2019-28
pubmed: 16782493
BMJ Open. 2013 Oct 23;3(10):e003581
pubmed: 24157820
Ambio. 2019 Jan;48(1):89-98
pubmed: 29730792
Aust J Rural Health. 2011 Apr;19(2):70-4
pubmed: 21438948
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Feb 07;10(2):678-98
pubmed: 23435590
N S W Public Health Bull. 2010 May-Jun;21(5-6):139-45
pubmed: 20637171
BMC Palliat Care. 2013 Jul 23;12(1):26
pubmed: 23875957
Conserv Biol. 2008 Dec;22(6):1443-51
pubmed: 18680501
Contemp Nurse. 2013 Dec;46(1):28-40
pubmed: 24716759