Transduction Efficiency of Adeno-Associated Virus Serotypes After Local Injection in Mouse and Human Skeletal Muscle.
Animals
Dependovirus
/ classification
Female
Gene Expression
Gene Transfer Techniques
Genes, Reporter
Genetic Therapy
/ methods
Genetic Vectors
/ administration & dosage
Humans
Injections, Intramuscular
Male
Mice
Mice, Knockout
Mice, Transgenic
Muscle, Skeletal
/ metabolism
Serogroup
Transduction, Genetic
Transgenes
AAV
fibrosis
preclinical
skeletal muscle
tropism
xenograft
Journal
Human gene therapy
ISSN: 1557-7422
Titre abrégé: Hum Gene Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9008950
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
28
12
2019
medline:
4
6
2021
entrez:
28
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector is an efficient tool for gene delivery in skeletal muscle. AAV-based therapies show promising results for treatment of various genetic disorders, including muscular dystrophy. These dystrophies represent a heterogeneous group of diseases affecting muscles and typically characterized by progressive skeletal muscle wasting and weakness and the development of fibrosis. The tropism of each AAV serotype has been extensively studied using systemic delivery routes, but very few studies have compared their transduction efficiency through direct intramuscular injection. Yet, in some muscular dystrophies, where only a few muscles are primarily affected, a local intramuscular injection to target these muscles would be the most appropriate route. A comprehensive comparison between different recombinant AAV (rAAV) serotypes is therefore needed. In this study, we investigated the transduction efficiency of rAAV serotypes 1-10 by local injection in skeletal muscle of control C57BL/6 mice. We used a CMV-nls-LacZ reporter cassette allowing nuclear expression of LacZ to easily localize targeted cells. Detection of β-galactosidase activity on muscle cryosections demonstrated that rAAV serotypes 1, 7, 8, 9, and 10 were more efficient than the others, with rAAV9 being the most efficient in mice. Furthermore, using a model of human muscle xenograft in immunodeficient mice, we observed that in human muscle, rAAV8 and rAAV9 had similar transduction efficiency. These findings demonstrate for the first time that the human muscle xenograft can be used to evaluate AAV-based therapeutical approaches in a human context.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31880951
doi: 10.1089/hum.2019.173
pmc: PMC7047108
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
233-240Références
Virology. 1996 Jul 1;221(1):208-17
pubmed: 8661429
Blood. 2003 Oct 1;102(7):2412-9
pubmed: 12791653
J Virol. 1998 Jan;72(1):309-19
pubmed: 9420229
J Virol. 2017 Aug 24;91(18):
pubmed: 28679762
J Virol. 1997 Sep;71(9):6823-33
pubmed: 9261407
J Virol. 2004 Jun;78(12):6381-8
pubmed: 15163731
Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2014;1:
pubmed: 25580445
Hum Gene Ther Methods. 2015 Apr;26(2):54-61
pubmed: 25763686
J Virol. 1983 Feb;45(2):555-64
pubmed: 6300419
Nat Med. 2004 Aug;10(8):828-34
pubmed: 15273747
Nat Med. 1999 Apr;5(4):439-43
pubmed: 10202936
Virology. 2004 Dec 20;330(2):375-83
pubmed: 15567432
Cell Rep. 2019 Apr 23;27(4):1254-1264.e7
pubmed: 31018138
Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2017 Dec 01;8:87-104
pubmed: 29326962
Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2018 Aug 08;10:291-302
pubmed: 30155509
Nat Protoc. 2006;1(3):1412-28
pubmed: 17406430
J Virol. 1999 May;73(5):3994-4003
pubmed: 10196295
Gene Ther. 2007 Nov;14(22):1605-9
pubmed: 17898796
Nature. 2016 Feb 4;530(7588):108-12
pubmed: 26814968
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019 May;18(5):358-378
pubmed: 30710128
J Virol. 2001 Jul;75(14):6615-24
pubmed: 11413329
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51627
pubmed: 23251598
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Sep 3;99(18):11854-9
pubmed: 12192090
J Pathol. 2008 Jan;214(2):199-210
pubmed: 18161745
Mol Ther. 2019 Sep 4;27(9):1568-1585
pubmed: 31327755
Skelet Muscle. 2015 Nov 10;5:37
pubmed: 26561520
Hum Gene Ther. 2017 Nov;28(11):982-987
pubmed: 28825330
Mol Ther. 2018 Jan 3;26(1):289-303
pubmed: 29055620
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2013 Mar;72(3):234-43
pubmed: 23399899
Hum Gene Ther. 2010 Oct;21(10):1343-8
pubmed: 20497037
Nat Genet. 1998 Feb;18(2):164-7
pubmed: 9462747
J Virol. 1999 Feb;73(2):1309-19
pubmed: 9882336
Curr Opin Virol. 2014 Aug;7:108-18
pubmed: 25047752
Mol Ther. 2018 Oct 3;26(10):2337-2356
pubmed: 30093306
Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2014 Sep 10;1:14040
pubmed: 26015979
Exp Cell Res. 2010 Nov 1;316(18):3050-8
pubmed: 20570674
Virol J. 2013 Mar 06;10:74
pubmed: 23497173
Nat Biotechnol. 2005 Mar;23(3):321-8
pubmed: 15735640
Front Microbiol. 2011 Nov 03;2:220
pubmed: 22065964
Hum Gene Ther. 2011 Nov;22(11):1433-44
pubmed: 21574868
Nat Commun. 2017 Mar 31;8:14848
pubmed: 28361972
Mol Ther. 2008 Jun;16(6):1073-80
pubmed: 18414476
Front Microbiol. 2011 Sep 26;2:201
pubmed: 21980317
Nat Med. 2002 Mar;8(3):253-61
pubmed: 11875496
Hum Mol Genet. 2014 Jun 15;23(12):3180-8
pubmed: 24452336