Comparison of cumulative clinical benefits of biologics for the treatment of psoriasis over 16 weeks: Results from a network meta-analysis.


Journal

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
ISSN: 1097-6787
Titre abrégé: J Am Acad Dermatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7907132

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2020
Historique:
received: 01 11 2018
revised: 06 12 2019
accepted: 19 12 2019
pubmed: 31 12 2019
medline: 25 11 2020
entrez: 30 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Cumulative clinical improvement and speed of improvement are important to psoriasis patients. Compare cumulative benefits of biologics over 12 to 16 weeks in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. A systematic literature review identified phase III trial data on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) responses for biologics during 12 and 16 weeks of treatment. Cumulative clinical benefit, measured by the area under the curve for PASI ≥75% improvement (PASI 75), ≥90% improvement (PASI 90), and 100% improvement (PASI 100), was compared using the network meta-analysis and Bayesian methodology on the relative probability of achieving percentage of maximum area under the curve. Among biologics approved for psoriasis treatment, anti-interleukin-17 biologics demonstrated consistently greater cumulative clinical benefits on PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 over the 12- or 16-week period than anti-interleukin-23 and other biologics. For biologics with 12-week data, ixekizumab and brodalumab showed greater cumulative benefits for PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 than secukinumab, followed by guselkumab, infliximab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, and etanercept. Ixekizumab showed greater cumulative benefits than all other biologics reporting 16-week data. Recently approved biologics were not included. Ixekizumab (at 12 weeks and 16 weeks) and brodalumab (at 12 weeks) had greater cumulative clinical benefit than all of other biologics studied.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Cumulative clinical improvement and speed of improvement are important to psoriasis patients.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
Compare cumulative benefits of biologics over 12 to 16 weeks in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis.
METHODS METHODS
A systematic literature review identified phase III trial data on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) responses for biologics during 12 and 16 weeks of treatment. Cumulative clinical benefit, measured by the area under the curve for PASI ≥75% improvement (PASI 75), ≥90% improvement (PASI 90), and 100% improvement (PASI 100), was compared using the network meta-analysis and Bayesian methodology on the relative probability of achieving percentage of maximum area under the curve.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among biologics approved for psoriasis treatment, anti-interleukin-17 biologics demonstrated consistently greater cumulative clinical benefits on PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 over the 12- or 16-week period than anti-interleukin-23 and other biologics. For biologics with 12-week data, ixekizumab and brodalumab showed greater cumulative benefits for PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 than secukinumab, followed by guselkumab, infliximab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, and etanercept. Ixekizumab showed greater cumulative benefits than all other biologics reporting 16-week data.
LIMITATIONS CONCLUSIONS
Recently approved biologics were not included.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Ixekizumab (at 12 weeks and 16 weeks) and brodalumab (at 12 weeks) had greater cumulative clinical benefit than all of other biologics studied.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31884091
pii: S0190-9622(19)33315-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.12.038
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
Biological Products 0
guselkumab 089658A12D
brodalumab 6ZA31Y954Z
Infliximab B72HH48FLU
ixekizumab BTY153760O
Ustekinumab FU77B4U5Z0
Etanercept OP401G7OJC

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1138-1149

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Richard B Warren (RB)

Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, National Institute for Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Melinda Gooderham (M)

SKiN Centre for Dermatology, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.

Russel Burge (R)

Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana; University of Cincinnati. Electronic address: burge_russel_thomas@lilly.com.

Baojin Zhu (B)

Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.

David Amato (D)

Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Karen Huayu Liu (KH)

Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.

David Shrom (D)

Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Jiaying Guo (J)

Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Alan Brnabic (A)

Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Andrew Blauvelt (A)

Oregon Medical Research Center, Portland, Oregon.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH