Eight-year post-trial follow-up of health care and long-term care costs of tele-based health coaching.
coronary artery disease
costs
effectiveness
health coaching
type 2 diabetes
Journal
Health services research
ISSN: 1475-6773
Titre abrégé: Health Serv Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0053006
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
31
12
2019
medline:
20
11
2020
entrez:
30
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the long-term effect of telephone health coaching on health care and long-term care (LTC) costs in type 2 diabetes (T2D) and coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) data were linked to Finnish national health and social care registries and electronic health records (EHR). Post-trial eight-year economic evaluation was conducted. A total of 1,535 patients (≥45 years) were randomized to the intervention (n = 1034) and control groups (n = 501). The intervention group received monthly telephone health coaching for 12 months. Usual health care and LTC were provided for both groups. Intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant change in total health and long-term care costs (intervention effect €1248 [3 percent relative reduction], CI -6347 to 2217) in the intervention compared to the control group. There were also no significant changes among subgroups of patients with T2D or CAD. Health coaching had a nonsignificant effect on health care and long-term care costs in the 8-year follow-up among patients with T2D or CAD. More research is needed to study, which patient groups, at which state of the disease trajectory of T2D and cardiovascular disease, would best benefit from health coaching.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31884682
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13251
pmc: PMC7080381
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00552903']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
211-217Informations de copyright
© Health Research and Educational Trust.
Références
Popul Health Manag. 2016 Jun;19(3):187-95
pubmed: 26237303
Diabetes Care. 2009 Aug;32(8):1418-20
pubmed: 19401442
Med Care. 2015 Feb;53(2):133-40
pubmed: 25588134
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jan 20;14:26
pubmed: 24444378
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 15;11(9):e0161269
pubmed: 27632360
Nurs Forum. 2014 Jan-Mar;49(1):18-29
pubmed: 24456550
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jul 11;369(2):145-54
pubmed: 23796131
Aust Health Rev. 2013 Jun;37(3):381-8
pubmed: 23701944
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Apr 01;22(4):e141-6
pubmed: 27143350
JAMA. 1997 Nov 26;278(20):1687-92
pubmed: 9388089
BMJ. 2013 Aug 06;347:f4585
pubmed: 23920348
Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr;55(2):211-217
pubmed: 31884682
Stat Med. 2000 Dec 15;19(23):3219-36
pubmed: 11113956
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun 10;12:147
pubmed: 22682298
Diabetes Care. 2013 Sep;36(9):2628-38
pubmed: 23628621
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Nov-Dec;20(6):64-78
pubmed: 11816692
PLoS Med. 2016 Jun 07;13(6):e1002035
pubmed: 27270663
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Dec;13(12):670-6
pubmed: 18069910
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 15;17(1):138
pubmed: 28202032
J Telemed Telecare. 2017 Sep;23(8):716-724
pubmed: 27605214
Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 01;5(1):146
pubmed: 27585627
N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 25;368(17):1613-24
pubmed: 23614587
Prof Case Manag. 2017 Sep/Oct;22(5):228-238
pubmed: 28777235
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Nov;97(2):147-57
pubmed: 25127667
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008 Mar;20(3):155-62
pubmed: 18336692