Deep Learning Detection of Penumbral Tissue on Arterial Spin Labeling in Stroke.
arterial spin labeling
deep learning
magnetic resonance imaging
perfusion imaging
stroke
Journal
Stroke
ISSN: 1524-4628
Titre abrégé: Stroke
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0235266
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
31
12
2019
medline:
1
7
2020
entrez:
31
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background and Purpose- Selection of patients with acute ischemic stroke for endovascular treatment generally relies on dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography perfusion. Dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging requires injection of contrast, whereas computed tomography perfusion requires high doses of ionizing radiation. The purpose of this work was to develop and evaluate a deep learning (DL)-based algorithm for assisting the selection of suitable patients with acute ischemic stroke for endovascular treatment based on 3-dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL). Methods- A total of 167 image sets of 3-dimensional pCASL data from 137 patients with acute ischemic stroke scanned on 1.5T and 3.0T Siemens MR systems were included for neural network training. The concurrently acquired dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging was used to produce labels of hypoperfused brain regions, analyzed using commercial software. The DL and 6 machine learning (ML) algorithms were trained with 10-fold cross-validation. The eligibility for endovascular treatment was determined retrospectively based on the criteria of perfusion/diffusion mismatch in the DEFUSE 3 trial (Endovascular Therapy Following Imaging Evaluation for Ischemic Stroke). The trained DL algorithm was further applied on twelve 3-dimensional pCASL data sets acquired on 1.5T and 3T General Electric MR systems, without fine-tuning of parameters. Results- The DL algorithm can predict the dynamic susceptibility contrast-defined hypoperfusion region in pCASL with a voxel-wise area under the curve of 0.958, while the 6 ML algorithms ranged from 0.897 to 0.933. For retrospective determination for subject-level endovascular treatment eligibility, the DL algorithm achieved an accuracy of 92%, with a sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 0.95. When applied to the GE pCASL data, the DL algorithm achieved a voxel-wise area under the curve of 0.94 and a subject-level accuracy of 92% for endovascular treatment eligibility. Conclusions- pCASL perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in conjunction with the DL algorithm provides a promising approach for assisting decision-making for endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31884904
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027457
pmc: PMC7224203
mid: NIHMS1549112
doi:
Substances chimiques
Spin Labels
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
489-497Subventions
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB028297
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS066506
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : UH2 NS100614
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : UH3 NS100614
Pays : United States
Références
Front Neurol. 2018 Sep 25;9:784
pubmed: 30319525
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):708-718
pubmed: 29364767
Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44
pubmed: 26017442
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Nov;32(5):1024-37
pubmed: 21031505
Stroke. 2015 Feb;46(2):419-24
pubmed: 25550366
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2018 Mar;38(3):382-392
pubmed: 28266894
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 May;158:113-122
pubmed: 29544777
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):1019-30
pubmed: 25671798
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Oct;181:20-7
pubmed: 25124706
Stroke. 2009 Feb;40(2):469-75
pubmed: 19109547
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Apr;7(4):299-309
pubmed: 18296121
Stroke. 2008 Mar;39(3):870-7
pubmed: 18258831
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Oct;39(10):1776-1784
pubmed: 29419402
Int J Stroke. 2018 Aug;13(6):554-567
pubmed: 29543140
Neuroimage Clin. 2013 Jul 06;3:1-7
pubmed: 24159561
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 30;12(11):e0188891
pubmed: 29190675
Int J Stroke. 2015 Apr;10(3):348-53
pubmed: 23802548
Stroke. 2012 Jul;43(7):1843-8
pubmed: 22539548
Stroke. 2011 Sep;42(9):2485-91
pubmed: 21799169
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2285-95
pubmed: 25882376
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 10;9(2):e88225
pubmed: 24520356
Stroke. 2017 May;48(5):1271-1277
pubmed: 28389614
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001 Jan;20(1):45-57
pubmed: 11293691
J Child Neurol. 2017 Mar;32(4):408-417
pubmed: 28019129
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2017 Jun 21;19:221-248
pubmed: 28301734
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2015 Mar 31;35(4):630-7
pubmed: 25564233
Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Nov;17(3):143-55
pubmed: 12391568
Front Neurol. 2018 Sep 04;9:717
pubmed: 30233482
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):1009-18
pubmed: 25671797
Stroke. 2012 Apr;43(4):1018-24
pubmed: 22328551
Radiology. 2018 May;287(2):658-666
pubmed: 29267145
Neurol Res. 2019 Aug;41(8):681-690
pubmed: 31038007
Int J Angiol. 2013 Sep;22(3):149-54
pubmed: 24436602
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 20;10(7):e0133566
pubmed: 26193486