DWI and PRECISE criteria in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: A multicentre preliminary experience of different ADC calculations.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Algorithms
Data Collection
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Disease Progression
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Observer Variation
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
ROC Curve
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Watchful Waiting
Active surveillance
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging
Molecular imaging
Prostate cancer
Journal
Magnetic resonance imaging
ISSN: 1873-5894
Titre abrégé: Magn Reson Imaging
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8214883
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
20
09
2019
revised:
11
12
2019
accepted:
27
12
2019
pubmed:
4
1
2020
medline:
3
11
2020
entrez:
4
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The PRECISE score estimates the likelihood of radiological progression in patients on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa) with serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). A PRECISE score of 1 or 2 denotes radiological regression, PRECISE 3 indicates stability and PRECISE 4 or 5 implies progression. We evaluated the inter-reader reproducibility of different apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) calculations and their relationship to the PRECISE score. Baseline and follow-up scans (on the same MR systems) of 30 patients with visible lesions from two different institutions (University College London and Sapienza University of Rome) were analysed by two radiologists (one from each site). The PRECISE score was initially assessed in consensus. At least six weeks later, to reduce the likelihood of being influenced by the consensus PRECISE reading, each radiologist independently calculated ADC for the following: lesion, non-cancerous tissue and urine in the bladder. Normalised ADC ratios were calculated with respect to normal prostatic tissue (npADC) and urine. Spearman's correlation (ρ), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), differences in ADC and ROC curves were computed. Interobserver reproducibility was very good (ρ > 0.8; ICC > 0.90). Lesion ADC (0.91 vs 0.73 × 10 The ADC, npADC ratio and the PRECISE score should be recorded for MRI-based AS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31899283
pii: S0730-725X(19)30574-0
doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.12.007
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
50-58Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/M009092/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.