T2 mapping of molecular subtypes of WHO grade II/III gliomas.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Brain Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Female
Glioma
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
/ genetics
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Male
Middle Aged
Mutation
Neuroimaging
/ methods
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
World Health Organization
Gliomas
IDH
MRI
T2-mapping
Journal
BMC neurology
ISSN: 1471-2377
Titre abrégé: BMC Neurol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Jan 2020
08 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
15
03
2019
accepted:
27
12
2019
entrez:
10
1
2020
pubmed:
10
1
2020
medline:
4
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
According to the new WHO classification from 2016, molecular profiles have shown to provide reliable information about prognosis and treatment response. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the diagnostic potential of non-invasive quantitative T2 mapping in the detection of IDH1/2 mutation status in grade II-III gliomas. Retrospective evaluation of MR examinations in 30 patients with histopathological proven WHO-grade II (n = 9) and III (n = 21) astrocytomas (18 IDH-mutated, 12 IDH-wildtype). Consensus annotation by two observers by use of ROI's in quantitative T2-mapping sequences were performed in all patients. T2 relaxation times were measured pixelwise. A significant difference (p = 0,0037) between the central region of IDH-mutated tumors (356,83 ± 114,97 ms) and the IDH-wildtype (199,92 ± 53,13 ms) was found. Furthermore, relaxation times between the central region (322,62 ± 127,41 ms) and the peripheral region (211,1 ± 74,16 ms) of WHO grade II and III astrocytomas differed significantly (p = 0,0021). The central regions relaxation time of WHO-grade II (227,44 ± 80,09 ms) and III gliomas (322,62 ± 127,41 ms) did not differ significantly (p = 0,2276). The difference between the smallest and the largest T2 value (so called "range") is significantly larger (p = 0,0017) in IDH-mutated tumors (230,89 ± 121,11 ms) than in the IDH-wildtype (96,33 ± 101,46 ms). Interobserver variability showed no significant differences. Quantitative evaluation of T2-mapping relaxation times shows significant differences regarding the IDH-status in WHO grade II and III gliomas adding important information regarding the new 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of tumors of the central nervous system. This to our knowledge is the first study regarding T2 mapping and the IDH1/2 status shows that the mutational status seems to be more important for the appearance on T2 images than the WHO grade.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
According to the new WHO classification from 2016, molecular profiles have shown to provide reliable information about prognosis and treatment response. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the diagnostic potential of non-invasive quantitative T2 mapping in the detection of IDH1/2 mutation status in grade II-III gliomas.
METHODS
METHODS
Retrospective evaluation of MR examinations in 30 patients with histopathological proven WHO-grade II (n = 9) and III (n = 21) astrocytomas (18 IDH-mutated, 12 IDH-wildtype). Consensus annotation by two observers by use of ROI's in quantitative T2-mapping sequences were performed in all patients. T2 relaxation times were measured pixelwise.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A significant difference (p = 0,0037) between the central region of IDH-mutated tumors (356,83 ± 114,97 ms) and the IDH-wildtype (199,92 ± 53,13 ms) was found. Furthermore, relaxation times between the central region (322,62 ± 127,41 ms) and the peripheral region (211,1 ± 74,16 ms) of WHO grade II and III astrocytomas differed significantly (p = 0,0021). The central regions relaxation time of WHO-grade II (227,44 ± 80,09 ms) and III gliomas (322,62 ± 127,41 ms) did not differ significantly (p = 0,2276). The difference between the smallest and the largest T2 value (so called "range") is significantly larger (p = 0,0017) in IDH-mutated tumors (230,89 ± 121,11 ms) than in the IDH-wildtype (96,33 ± 101,46 ms). Interobserver variability showed no significant differences.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Quantitative evaluation of T2-mapping relaxation times shows significant differences regarding the IDH-status in WHO grade II and III gliomas adding important information regarding the new 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of tumors of the central nervous system. This to our knowledge is the first study regarding T2 mapping and the IDH1/2 status shows that the mutational status seems to be more important for the appearance on T2 images than the WHO grade.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31914945
doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1590-1
pii: 10.1186/s12883-019-1590-1
pmc: PMC6947951
doi:
Substances chimiques
IDH2 protein, human
EC 1.1.1.41
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
EC 1.1.1.41
IDH1 protein, human
EC 1.1.1.42.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
8Références
Acta Neuropathol. 2009 Oct;118(4):469-74
pubmed: 19554337
Radiology. 2017 Aug;284(2):316-331
pubmed: 28723281
J Neurooncol. 2017 May;133(1):37-45
pubmed: 28434111
Cancer Control. 2015 Apr;22(2):200-5
pubmed: 26068765
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Mar;159(3):403-418
pubmed: 28093610
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Jan;36(1):77-83
pubmed: 25104288
Magn Reson Med. 2001 Aug;46(2):401-6
pubmed: 11477646
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999 Apr;9(4):531-8
pubmed: 10232510
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 May;32(5):794-7
pubmed: 21474628
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Aug;44(8):1306-1311
pubmed: 28293705
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Aug;15(9):e395-403
pubmed: 25079102
Neuro Oncol. 2012 Feb;14(2):222-9
pubmed: 22146386
Brain Pathol. 2014 Sep;24(5):429-35
pubmed: 24990071
Sci Transl Med. 2012 Jan 11;4(116):116ra4
pubmed: 22238332
Eur J Neurol. 2015 Feb;22(2):348-54
pubmed: 25318355
Neuro Oncol. 2013 Sep;15(9):1114-26
pubmed: 23877318
J Neurooncol. 2017 Dec;135(3):611
pubmed: 28905256
Oncol Lett. 2014 Jun;7(6):1895-1902
pubmed: 24932255
Br J Radiol. 2018 Apr;91(1084):20170803
pubmed: 29271237
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Jul;45(9):1573-1584
pubmed: 29732524
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan;47(1):2-6
pubmed: 27799281
Oncologist. 2014 Apr;19(4):403-13
pubmed: 24664484
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Mar;210(3):621-628
pubmed: 29261348
Eur Radiol. 2013 Oct;23(10):2846-53
pubmed: 23686293
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Mar;38(3):492-499
pubmed: 28034994
Cancer. 2014 Aug 15;120(16):2440-7
pubmed: 24771584
J Neurooncol. 2018 Sep;139(2):399-409
pubmed: 29679199
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 10;28(11):1963-72
pubmed: 20231676
N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 19;360(8):765-73
pubmed: 19228619
Neuro Oncol. 2016 Jan;18(1):16-26
pubmed: 26188014
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):803-20
pubmed: 27157931
Acta Neuropathol. 2010 Dec;120(6):719-29
pubmed: 21080178
Sci Transl Med. 2012 Jan 11;4(116):116ra5
pubmed: 22238333
Neuro Oncol. 2013 Oct;15(10):1395-404
pubmed: 23925453
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Jan;19(1):109-117
pubmed: 27353503