Home-grown school feeding: assessment of a pilot program in Nepal.
Agriculture
Children
Dietary quality
Impact
Nutrition and health
Nutrition-sensitive learning
School meal
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Jan 2020
08 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
10
12
2019
accepted:
30
12
2019
entrez:
10
1
2020
pubmed:
10
1
2020
medline:
2
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Nepal School Meals Program reached 600,000 schoolchildren in basic education in 2017 and plays a key role in the government's strategy to increase children's academic and nutritional outcomes. A large part of the program is implemented through cash transfers with schools responsible for the school meal delivery. Home-grown school feeding, an approach in which local communities are given greater control over the school meals program and part of the food is sourced locally, may strengthen local ownership and improve meal quality, but there is a lack of evidence for impact. This study piloted home-grown school feeding in 30 schools reaching nearly 4000 children in Sindhupalchok and Bardiya districts in Nepal with the aim to assess operations and outcomes in comparison to the regular cash-based school meals program. The study used a one-time post evaluation with a mixed methods approach. Qualitative data were collected through 12 focus group discussions and 28 key informant interviews with government and school staff, parents, cooks, cooperative members, World Food Programme representatives and other stakeholders involved in the pilot program. The quantitative part applied a quasi-experimental design and used cross-sectional data collected from 1512 children in 30 pilot and 30 control schools. The quantitative data indicated that children in the pilot schools had a significantly higher provision of midday school meals (+ 19%; p < 0.01) and a higher school meal quality in terms of dietary diversity (+ 44%; p < 0.01) and nutritional content (e.g. a 21%-points higher consumption of vitamin A-rich fruit and vegetables; p < 0.01). The qualitative data identified key drivers of these positive outcomes as the use of standard meal options, capacity building of local stakeholders, strengthened community ownership and accountability mechanisms, and local food supply chains. Maintaining the observed gains would require a 20-33% increase in the current budget per school meal in addition to the cost of capacity building. This study for Nepal shows that home-grown school feeding strengthened operations of the school meals program and led to a significantly higher meal provision and quality of school meals.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The Nepal School Meals Program reached 600,000 schoolchildren in basic education in 2017 and plays a key role in the government's strategy to increase children's academic and nutritional outcomes. A large part of the program is implemented through cash transfers with schools responsible for the school meal delivery. Home-grown school feeding, an approach in which local communities are given greater control over the school meals program and part of the food is sourced locally, may strengthen local ownership and improve meal quality, but there is a lack of evidence for impact.
METHODS
METHODS
This study piloted home-grown school feeding in 30 schools reaching nearly 4000 children in Sindhupalchok and Bardiya districts in Nepal with the aim to assess operations and outcomes in comparison to the regular cash-based school meals program. The study used a one-time post evaluation with a mixed methods approach. Qualitative data were collected through 12 focus group discussions and 28 key informant interviews with government and school staff, parents, cooks, cooperative members, World Food Programme representatives and other stakeholders involved in the pilot program. The quantitative part applied a quasi-experimental design and used cross-sectional data collected from 1512 children in 30 pilot and 30 control schools.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The quantitative data indicated that children in the pilot schools had a significantly higher provision of midday school meals (+ 19%; p < 0.01) and a higher school meal quality in terms of dietary diversity (+ 44%; p < 0.01) and nutritional content (e.g. a 21%-points higher consumption of vitamin A-rich fruit and vegetables; p < 0.01). The qualitative data identified key drivers of these positive outcomes as the use of standard meal options, capacity building of local stakeholders, strengthened community ownership and accountability mechanisms, and local food supply chains. Maintaining the observed gains would require a 20-33% increase in the current budget per school meal in addition to the cost of capacity building.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study for Nepal shows that home-grown school feeding strengthened operations of the school meals program and led to a significantly higher meal provision and quality of school meals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31914980
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8143-9
pii: 10.1186/s12889-019-8143-9
pmc: PMC6950908
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
28Subventions
Organisme : U.S. Department of Agriculture
ID : FFE-367-2017/021-00
Références
J Postgrad Med. 2014 Apr-Jun;60(2):118-22
pubmed: 24823508
Singapore Med J. 2008 Mar;49(3):256-60; quiz 261
pubmed: 18363011
Indian Pediatr. 1999 Dec;36(12):1221-8
pubmed: 10745363
Psychol Health. 2010 Dec;25(10):1229-45
pubmed: 20204937
Front Public Health. 2015 Aug 05;3:148
pubmed: 26301209
Trials. 2016 Jan 20;17:37
pubmed: 26792672
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
CMAJ. 2005 Aug 2;173(3):279-86
pubmed: 16076825
J Sch Health. 2008 Jan;78(1):1-8
pubmed: 18177294
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 3;11(11):e0166001
pubmed: 27812190
Health Promot Int. 2015 Dec;30(4):843-54
pubmed: 24694681
Trials. 2013 Feb 21;14:55
pubmed: 23433395
Nurse Res. 2011;18(2):52-62
pubmed: 21319484