Effect of high-dose strong statin for preventing periprocedural ischemic complications of carotid artery stenting.
Aged
Atorvastatin
/ administration & dosage
Brain Ischemia
/ diagnostic imaging
Carotid Artery Diseases
/ complications
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Drug Administration Schedule
Endovascular Procedures
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Rosuvastatin Calcium
/ administration & dosage
Stents
Stroke
/ diagnostic imaging
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Carotid artery stenosis
Carotid artery stenting
Diffusion-weighted imaging
Ischemic complication
Magnetic resonance imaging
Strong statin
Journal
Heart and vessels
ISSN: 1615-2573
Titre abrégé: Heart Vessels
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 8511258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
01
04
2019
accepted:
27
12
2019
pubmed:
12
1
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
12
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Statin therapy has been shown to induce carotid atherosclerotic plaque regression and reduce the periprocedural ischemic complications of carotid artery stenting (CAS). This study assessed the safety and usefulness of pretreatment using a high-dose strong statin (HDSS) to reduce the periprocedural ischemic complications of CAS. We analyzed 117 carotid lesions treated by CAS that were evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 48 h after the procedure. For 67 lesions, an HDSS (rosuvastatin 20 mg or atorvastatin 40 mg daily) were prescribed from at least 14 days before CAS to at least 14 days after procedure (HDSS group). Clinical and angiographic data, as well as in-hospital outcomes, of the HDSS group were retrospectively compared with 50 lesions with conventional treatment without an HDSS (non-HDSS group). There were no significant differences in the baseline clinical and procedural characteristics between the two groups. There was no side effect related to the HDSS. Stroke rates were similar between the two groups (3.0% in HDSS group vs 8.0% in non-HDSS group, p = 0.22). All were minor strokes. Compared to the non-HDSS group, the HDSS group had a lower frequency of new lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with MRI (25.4% vs 44.0%, p = 0.0345). New ipsilateral DWI-positive rate in the HDSS group was significantly lower than in the non-HDSS group (16.4% vs 34.0%, p = 0.0275). Nonipsilateral (contralateral or posterior circulation) DWI-positive rates were similar between the two groups (13.4% vs 20.0%, p = 0.34). Pretreatment with an HDSS might reduce the periprocedural ischemic complications of CAS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31925501
doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01552-5
pii: 10.1007/s00380-019-01552-5
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
0
Rosuvastatin Calcium
83MVU38M7Q
Atorvastatin
A0JWA85V8F
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM