Prognostic value of point-of-care ultrasound during cardiac arrest: a systematic review.
Cardiac arrest
Circulation
Echocardiogram
POCUS
Point-of-care ultrasound
Return of spontaneous
Ultrasound
Journal
Cardiovascular ultrasound
ISSN: 1476-7120
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Ultrasound
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101159952
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Jan 2020
13 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
25
08
2019
accepted:
08
01
2020
entrez:
15
1
2020
pubmed:
15
1
2020
medline:
31
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite significant improvements in cardiopulmonary resuscitation, sudden cardiac arrest is one of the leading causes of mortality in the United States. Ultrasound is a widely available tool that can be used to evaluate the presence of cardiac wall motion during cardiac arrest. Several clinical studies have evaluated the use of ultrasound to visualize cardiac motion as a predictor of mortality in cardiac arrest patients. However, there are limited data summarizing the prognostic value of point of care ultrasound evaluation during resuscitation. We performed a systematic literature review of the existing evidence examining the clinical utility of point-of-care ultrasound evaluation of cardiac wall motion as a predictor of cardiac resuscitation outcomes. We performed a systematic PubMed search of clinical studies up to July 23, 2019 evaluating point-of-care sonographic cardiac motion as a predictor of mortality following cardiac resuscitation. We included studies written in English that reviewed short-term outcomes and included adult populations. Fifteen clinical studies met inclusion criteria for assessing cardiac wall motion with point-of-care ultrasound and outcomes following cardiac resuscitation. Fourteen of the fifteen studies showed a statistically significant correlation between the presence of cardiac motion on ultrasound and short-term survival. This was most evident in patients with ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia as a presenting rhythm. Absence of cardiac motion non-survival. The data were pooled and the overall pooled odds ratio for return of spontaneous circulation in the presence of cardiac motion during CPR was 12.4 +/1 2.7 (p < 0.001). Evaluation of cardiac motion on transthoracic echocardiogram is a valuable tool in the prediction of short-term cardiac resuscitation outcomes. Given the safety and availability of ultrasound in the emergency department, it is reasonable to apply point-of-care ultrasound to cardiopulmonary resuscitation as long as its use does not interrupt resuscitation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Despite significant improvements in cardiopulmonary resuscitation, sudden cardiac arrest is one of the leading causes of mortality in the United States. Ultrasound is a widely available tool that can be used to evaluate the presence of cardiac wall motion during cardiac arrest. Several clinical studies have evaluated the use of ultrasound to visualize cardiac motion as a predictor of mortality in cardiac arrest patients. However, there are limited data summarizing the prognostic value of point of care ultrasound evaluation during resuscitation. We performed a systematic literature review of the existing evidence examining the clinical utility of point-of-care ultrasound evaluation of cardiac wall motion as a predictor of cardiac resuscitation outcomes.
METHODS/RESULTS
RESULTS
We performed a systematic PubMed search of clinical studies up to July 23, 2019 evaluating point-of-care sonographic cardiac motion as a predictor of mortality following cardiac resuscitation. We included studies written in English that reviewed short-term outcomes and included adult populations. Fifteen clinical studies met inclusion criteria for assessing cardiac wall motion with point-of-care ultrasound and outcomes following cardiac resuscitation. Fourteen of the fifteen studies showed a statistically significant correlation between the presence of cardiac motion on ultrasound and short-term survival. This was most evident in patients with ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia as a presenting rhythm. Absence of cardiac motion non-survival. The data were pooled and the overall pooled odds ratio for return of spontaneous circulation in the presence of cardiac motion during CPR was 12.4 +/1 2.7 (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Evaluation of cardiac motion on transthoracic echocardiogram is a valuable tool in the prediction of short-term cardiac resuscitation outcomes. Given the safety and availability of ultrasound in the emergency department, it is reasonable to apply point-of-care ultrasound to cardiopulmonary resuscitation as long as its use does not interrupt resuscitation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31931808
doi: 10.1186/s12947-020-0185-8
pii: 10.1186/s12947-020-0185-8
pmc: PMC6958750
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1Références
J Trauma. 2009 Dec;67(6):1154-7
pubmed: 20009660
Resuscitation. 2016 Dec;109:33-39
pubmed: 27693280
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012 Apr-Jun;16(2):251-5
pubmed: 22235765
Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Jun;8(6):616-21
pubmed: 11388936
JAMA. 2015 Jul 21;314(3):247-54
pubmed: 26197185
Turk J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar 25;16(1):12-6
pubmed: 27239632
Chin J Traumatol. 2012;15(5):284-7
pubmed: 23069099
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;36(3):488-493
pubmed: 29269162
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2016 Aug 20;14(1):33
pubmed: 27542597
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;70(3):442-445
pubmed: 28844272
Circulation. 2014 Nov 18;130(21):1876-82
pubmed: 25399396
Int J Biomed Sci. 2016 Sep;12(3):110-114
pubmed: 27829827
Resuscitation. 2016 Apr;101:21-6
pubmed: 26829701
JMIR Cardio. 2018 Mar 08;2(1):e7
pubmed: 31758780
J Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2016 Mar;24(1):1-6
pubmed: 27081437
J Int Med Res. 2012;40(2):804-9
pubmed: 22613446
Hippokratia. 2014 Apr;18(2):125-9
pubmed: 25336874
Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Jun;8(6):610-5
pubmed: 11388934
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1998 Oct;9(4):681-95
pubmed: 9738100
Am J Emerg Med. 2005 Jul;23(4):459-62
pubmed: 16032611
Resuscitation. 2016 Sep;106:58-64
pubmed: 27377670
Emerg Med J. 2011 Feb;28(2):119-21
pubmed: 20921017
Resuscitation. 2010 Nov;81(11):1527-33
pubmed: 20801576