Prognosis of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction Patients Implanted With a Prophylactic Defibrillator (from the Very-High-Rate Registry).
Aged
Death, Sudden, Cardiac
/ etiology
Defibrillators, Implantable
Female
France
/ epidemiology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction
/ complications
Primary Prevention
/ methods
Prognosis
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
/ methods
Risk Factors
Stroke Volume
/ physiology
Survival Rate
/ trends
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Function, Left
/ physiology
Journal
The American journal of cardiology
ISSN: 1879-1913
Titre abrégé: Am J Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0207277
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 04 2020
01 04 2020
Historique:
received:
21
10
2019
revised:
18
12
2019
accepted:
23
12
2019
pubmed:
15
1
2020
medline:
26
6
2020
entrez:
15
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
An implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is recommended in primary prevention patients with a coronary artery disease (CAD) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Benefits of ICD in CAD unrelated to coronary thrombosis are unknown. We sought to compare the prognosis of patients with CAD implanted with a prophylactic ICD according to the type of myocardial infarction (MI). Patients from the Very-High-Rate registry implanted with a prophylactic ICD for CAD between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively included. Cardiac resynchronization therapy patients were excluded. Patients with type 2 MI were matched (1:4) with patients with type 1 MI using propensity score. The following events were collected: death, hospitalization for heart failure, cardiac transplantation, and appropriated therapies on ventricular arrhythmia (≥220 beats/min). Among 571 consecutive ischemic patients, 65 type 2 MI patients were matched to 260 type 1. After a mean follow up of 55 ± 36 months, 63 patients (24%) died in type 1 group, 18 (28%) in type 2 group (p = 0.19). Survival rate from appropriate therapies on high-rate ventricular arrhythmias was significantly lower in type 2 group (p = 0.04). In conclusion, patients implanted with a prophylactic ICD for severe CAD, whether type 1 or type 2 MI, have similar outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31932082
pii: S0002-9149(20)30022-9
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.12.053
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1001-1005Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.