Strategies for improving the pedaling technique.


Journal

The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness
ISSN: 1827-1928
Titre abrégé: J Sports Med Phys Fitness
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 0376337

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Historique:
entrez: 15 1 2020
pubmed: 15 1 2020
medline: 31 3 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pedaling technique which can be defined as the way the cyclists pedal, has been mostly studied in lab conditions from pedal force kinetic, joints kinematic, and/or muscular activity patterns because it is considered as a main factor for gross efficiency (GE). Although this method is much controversial, its quality has extensively been evaluated from the index of pedal force effectiveness (IFE), i.e. the ratio between the effective to the total pedal force. Over the last thirty years, preferred pedaling technique has been compared between the experienced cyclists and non-cyclists and also often been manipulated by instructing these subjects to improve their effective force production during the downstroke phase ("pushing"), the upstroke phase ("pulling-up") or around top and bottom dead centers ("circling"). It has been shown that PREF pedaling technique is much repeatable across crank cycles in experienced cyclists than in novice cyclists. PULL involves a significant increase of IFE compared to PREF, mainly attributed to the increase of the muscular work of hip (RF) and knee flexors muscles (BF) during the upstroke. This improvement is larger in non-cyclists than in experienced cyclists but it can be optimized in the latter after a short-term training (2-4 weeks) with pedal force feedback or uncoupled cranks. Despite that PULL enhances a lower muscular recruitment of contralateral knee extensors, GE and cycling performance variables are not significantly increased, probably due to the reversal effect of training with normal cranks and the highly robust pedaling technique of experienced cyclists. The question arises, as to whether or not, changes in pedaling technique can improve cycling efficiency if enough time is given for cyclists to adapt to a new pedaling technique. Further studies should investigate the pedaling techniques in more "ecological" conditions, as there is not probably one but several pedaling techniques that could optimize cycling efficiency according to the pedaling conditions (time-trial, uphill, road, off-road and track cycling), and should also focus on the potential effects of long-term training of PULL pedaling technique on cycling efficiency and cycling performance.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31933344
pii: S0022-4707.19.08515-3
doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.19.08515-3
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2030-2039

Auteurs

Sébastien Duc (S)

Laboratoire Performance Santé Métrologie Société, UFR STAPS, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France - sebastien.duc@univ-reims.fr.

William Bertucci (W)

Laboratoire Performance Santé Métrologie Société, UFR STAPS, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France.

Frédéric Grappe (F)

Equipe Culture Sport-Santé-Société (EA 4660, C3S), UPFR-SPORTS, University of Franche Comté, Besançon, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH