LogP prediction performance with the SMD solvation model and the M06 density functional family for SAMPL6 blind prediction challenge molecules.
Computational chemistry
DFT
Implicit solvation
LogP
SAMPL6
Journal
Journal of computer-aided molecular design
ISSN: 1573-4951
Titre abrégé: J Comput Aided Mol Des
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8710425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2020
05 2020
Historique:
received:
16
10
2019
accepted:
08
01
2020
pubmed:
16
1
2020
medline:
18
8
2021
entrez:
16
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This work presents a quantum mechanical model for predicting octanol-water partition coefficients of small protein-kinase inhibitor fragments as part of the SAMPL6 LogP Prediction Challenge. The model calculates solvation free energy differences using the M06-2X functional with SMD implicit solvation and the def2-SVP basis set. This model was identified as dqxk4 in the SAMPL6 Challenge and was the third highest performing model in the physical methods category with 0.49 log Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) for predicting the 11 compounds in SAMPL6 blind prediction set. We also collaboratively investigated the use of empirical models to address model deficiencies for halogenated compounds at minimal additional computational cost. A mixed model consisting of the dqxk4 physical and hdpuj empirical models found improved performance at 0.34 log RMSE on the SAMPL6 dataset. This collaborative mixed model approach shows how empirical models can be leveraged to expediently improve performance in chemical spaces that are difficult for ab initio methods to simulate.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31939103
doi: 10.1007/s10822-020-00278-1
pii: 10.1007/s10822-020-00278-1
doi:
Substances chimiques
Solvents
0
Water
059QF0KO0R
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
511-522Références
J Chem Theory Comput. 2013 Apr 9;9(4):1918-31
pubmed: 26583543
J Chem Phys. 2006 Nov 21;125(19):194101
pubmed: 17129083
Chem Sci. 2018 May 30;9(24):5341-5346
pubmed: 30155232
J Chem Phys. 2010 Apr 21;132(15):154104
pubmed: 20423165
J Chem Inf Model. 2019 May 28;59(5):1849-1857
pubmed: 30912940
J Cheminform. 2011 Oct 07;3:33
pubmed: 21982300
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2020 Apr;34(4):405-420
pubmed: 31858363
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2011 Apr 14;13(14):6670-88
pubmed: 21384027
J Chem Phys. 2009 Apr 28;130(16):164106
pubmed: 19405560
J Chem Theory Comput. 2008 Dec 9;4(12):1996-2000
pubmed: 26620472
J Chem Inf Model. 2019 May 28;59(5):2257-2263
pubmed: 31042037
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2005 Sep 21;7(18):3297-305
pubmed: 16240044
J Chem Theory Comput. 2017 Mar 14;13(3):1034-1043
pubmed: 28245118
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2016 Nov;30(11):1129-1138
pubmed: 27646287
J Phys Chem B. 2009 May 7;113(18):6378-96
pubmed: 19366259