Exposure Determinants of Wood Dust, Microbial Components, Resin Acids and Terpenes in the Saw- and Planer Mill Industry.
BW and WW variance
endotoxin
exposure prediction model
fungal fragments
fungal spores
mixed model
season
task-based and department-based
Journal
Annals of work exposures and health
ISSN: 2398-7316
Titre abrégé: Ann Work Expo Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101698454
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 03 2020
10 03 2020
Historique:
received:
05
04
2019
revised:
04
11
2019
accepted:
11
12
2019
pubmed:
17
1
2020
medline:
16
1
2021
entrez:
17
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Sawmill workers have an increased risk of adverse respiratory outcomes, but knowledge about exposure-response relationships is incomplete. The objective of this study was to assess exposure determinants of dust, microbial components, resin acids, and terpenes in sawmills processing pine and spruce, to guide the development of department and task-based exposure prediction models. 2474 full-shift repeated personal airborne measurements of dust, resin acids, fungal spores and fragments, endotoxins, mono-, and sesquiterpenes were conducted in 10 departments of 11 saw- and planer mills in Norway in 2013-2016. Department and task-based exposure determinants were identified and geometric mean ratios (GMRs) estimated using mixed model regression. The effects of season and wood type were also studied. The exposure ratio of individual components was similar in many of the departments. Nonetheless, the highest microbial and monoterpene exposure (expressed per hour) were estimated in the green part of the sawmills: endotoxins [GMR (95% confidence interval) 1.2 (1.0-1.3)], fungal spores [1.1 (1.0-1.2)], and monoterpenes [1.3 (1.1-1.4)]. The highest resin acid GMR was estimated in the dry part of the sawmills [1.4 (1.2-1.5)]. Season and wood type had a large effect on the estimated exposure. In particular, summer and spruce were strong determinants of increased exposure to endotoxin (GMRs [4.6 (3.5-6.2)] and [2.0 (1.4-3.0)], respectively) and fungal spores (GMRs [2.2 (1.7-2.8)] and [1.5 (1.0-2.1)], respectively). Pine was a strong determinant for increased exposure to both resin acid and monoterpenes. Work as a boilerman was associated with moderate to relatively high exposure to all components [1.0-1.4 (0.8-2.0)], although the estimates were based on 13-15 samples only. Cleaning in the saw, planer, and sorting of dry timber departments was associated with high exposure estimates for several components, whereas work with transportation and stock/finished goods were associated with low exposure estimates for all components. The department-based models explained 21-61% of the total exposure variances, 0-90% of the between worker (BW) variance, and 1-36% of the within worker (WW) variances. The task-based models explained 22-62% of the total variance, 0-91% of the BW variance, and 0-33% of the WW variance. Exposure determinants in sawmills including department, task, season, and wood type differed for individual components, and explained a relatively large proportion of the total variances. Application of department/task-based exposure prediction models for specific exposures will therefore likely improve the assessment of exposure-response associations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31942929
pii: 5706932
doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxz096
pmc: PMC7064270
doi:
Substances chimiques
Air Pollutants, Occupational
0
Dust
0
Terpenes
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
282-296Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society.
Références
Ann Occup Hyg. 2008 Jun;52(4):227-38
pubmed: 18407937
Am J Ind Med. 2004 Dec;46(6):663-7
pubmed: 15551365
Occup Environ Med. 1994 Mar;51(3):160-4
pubmed: 8130843
AIHAJ. 2000 Jul-Aug;61(4):521-8
pubmed: 10976682
Ann Occup Hyg. 2001 Oct;45(7):603-8
pubmed: 11583662
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1983;51(3):191-8
pubmed: 6852927
Ann Occup Hyg. 1995 Apr;39(2):141-54
pubmed: 7741413
Am J Ind Med. 1997 Apr;31(4):385-98
pubmed: 9093652
Am J Ind Med. 1993 Aug;24(2):207-22
pubmed: 8213847
Ann Work Expo Health. 2018 Jul 6;62(6):674-688
pubmed: 29878039
Occup Environ Med. 1994 Mar;51(3):165-72
pubmed: 8130844
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1992;97(4):274-82
pubmed: 1597347
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1989 Mar;83(3):610-8
pubmed: 2926083
Eur J Respir Dis Suppl. 1980;107:163-7
pubmed: 6934078
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1996 Jun;22(3):182-90
pubmed: 8837263
Am J Ind Med. 2005 Apr;47(4):349-57
pubmed: 15776474
Am J Ind Med. 2004 Jan;45(1):113-22
pubmed: 14691975
Ann Occup Hyg. 2003 Mar;47(2):95-9
pubmed: 12581994
Occup Environ Med. 2008 Oct;65(10):647-54
pubmed: 18182588
Am J Ind Med. 1994 Apr;25(4):551-8
pubmed: 8010297
Ann Occup Hyg. 2012 Apr;56(3):253-63
pubmed: 22025531
Chest. 1995 Sep;108(3):642-6
pubmed: 7656610
Ann Occup Hyg. 1999 May;43(4):247-55
pubmed: 10432869
Ann Occup Hyg. 2005 Jul;49(5):385-91
pubmed: 15699057
Biometrics. 2000 Dec;56(4):1218-21
pubmed: 11129482
Am J Ind Med. 1993 May;23(5):793-9
pubmed: 8506856
AIHAJ. 2000 Sep-Oct;61(5):727-32
pubmed: 11071425