An artificial neural network to model response of a radiotherapy beam monitoring system.

artificial intelligence in numerical model artificial neural network integral quality monitoring (IQM) system machine learning for quality assurance radiation therapy

Journal

Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Historique:
received: 15 10 2019
revised: 26 12 2019
accepted: 07 01 2020
pubmed: 20 1 2020
medline: 27 1 2021
entrez: 20 1 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The integral quality monitor (IQM) is a real-time radiotherapy beam monitoring system, which consists of a spatially sensitive large-area ion chamber, mounted at the collimator of the linear accelerator (linac), and a calculation algorithm to predict the detector signal for each beam segment. By comparing the measured and predicted signals the system validates the beam delivery. The current commercial version of IQM uses an analytic method to predict the signal, which requires a semi-empirical approach to determine and optimize various calculation parameters. The process of developing the calculation model is complex and time consuming, and moreover, the model cannot be easily generalized across various beam delivery platforms with different combinations of beam energy, beam flattening, beam shaping elements, and Linac models. Therefore, as an alternative solution, we investigated the feasibility of developing a machine learning (ML) method, using an artificial neural network (ANN), to predict the ion chamber signal. In developing an ANN, it is not necessary to explicitly account for each of the elements of beam interactions with various structures in the beam path to the ion chamber. The ANN was designed with multilayer perceptron (MLP). The input layer consisted of multiple features, derived from the geometrical characteristics of beam segments. Gradient descent error backpropagation technique was used to train the ANN. The combined training dataset included 270 rectangular fields, and 801 clinical IMRT fields delivered using 6 MV beams on Varian TrueBeam Artificial neural networks with one hidden layer, consisting of 10 nodes, and 10 input features provided optimum results. Once the feature sets were extracted, the time required for the network training was on the order of a few minutes, and the time required to perform an output calculation per field was only fraction of a second. More than 95% of clinical intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) segments were calculated within ± 3.0% modeling error for Varian Truebeam (90% and ±3.3% for Elekta Infinity). A total of 3320 volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) segments from Truebeam were calculated using the ANN trained with IMRT fields. More than 95% of the cumulative VMAT beam segments were within 3.6% modeling error, similar to the performance for IMRT segments. In general the modeling error was found to be inversely proportional to the size and intensity of the beam segment. A prototype ANN has been developed for predicting the signals of the IQM system, with substantially less efforts compared to the analytic model. The performance of the ANN was found to be at least equivalent to that of the analytic method, in terms of average and maximum error, for 6 MV beams on both Varian TrueBeam and Elekta Infinity platforms.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31955428
doi: 10.1002/mp.14033
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1983-1994

Informations de copyright

© 2020 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Références

Webb S. Optimizing the planning of intensity modulated radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 1994;39:2229-2246.
Boyer A, Yu C. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with dynamic multileaf collimators. Semin Radia Oncol. 1999;9:48-59.
Otto K. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. Med Phys. 2008;35:310-317.
Jaffray D, Siewerdsen J. Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: initial performance characterization. Med Phys. 2000;27:1311-1323.
Raaijmakers AJ, Hardemark B, Raaymakers BW, Raaij-makers CP, Lagendijk JJ. Dose optimization for the MRI-accelerator: IMRT in the presence of a magnetic field. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:7045-7054.
Islam MK, Norrlinger BD, Smale JR, et al. An integral quality monitoring system for real-time verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2009;36:5420-5428.
Hoffman D, Chung E, Hess C, Stern R, Benedict S. Characterization and evaluation of an integrated quality monitoring system for online quality assurance of external beam radiation therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017;18:40-48.
Casar B, Pasler M, Wegener S, Hoffman D, Talamonti C. Influence of the integral quality monitor transmission detector on high energy photon beams: a multi-centre study. Z Med Phys. 2017;27:232-242.
Sito M, Sano N, Shibata Y, Kuriyama K, Komiyama T. Comparison on MLC error sensitivity of various commercial devices for VMAT pre-treatment quality assurance. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018;19:87-93.
Marrazzo L, Arilli C, Pasler M, et al. Real time beam monitoring for error detection in IMRT plans and impact on dose-volume histograms. Strahlentherapie und Onckologie. 2018;194:243-254.
Jaffray D, Battista J, Fenster A, Munro P. X-ray sources of medical linear accelerators: focal and extra-focal radiation. Med Phys. 1993;20:1417-1427.
Sharpe M. Jaffray D, Battista J, Munro P. Extrafocal radiation: a unified approach to the prediction of beam penumbra and output factors for megavoltage x-ray beams. Med Phys. 1995;22:2065-2074.
Irie B, Miyake S. Capabilities of three-layered perceptrons. IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Networks 1.1988:641-648.
Hetcht-Nielsen R. Kolmogorov mapping neural network existence theorem. IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Networks 2. 1989:359-366.
Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw. 1989;2:359-366.
Sifaoui A, Abdelkrim A, Benrejeb M. On the use of neural network as a universal approximator. Int J Sci Techn Automat Contr Comput Eng. 2008;2:386-399.
Kingma DP, Ba JL. ADAM: A method for stochastic Optimization, International conference on Learning Representations; 2015.
Hinton G, Salakhutdinov R. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science. 2006;313:504-507.
Srivastava N, Hinton G, Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Salakhutdinov R. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Mach Learn Res. 2014;15:1929-1958.
Ioffe S, Szegedy C, Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariance Shift, ICML'15 Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, 237:448-456.

Auteurs

Young-Bin Cho (YB)

Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada, M5G 2C1.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, M5T 1P5.
Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1L5.

Makan Farrokhkish (M)

Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada, M5G 2C1.

Bern Norrlinger (B)

Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada, M5G 2C1.

Robert Heaton (R)

Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada, M5G 2C1.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, M5T 1P5.

David Jaffray (D)

Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada, M5G 2C1.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, M5T 1P5.
Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1L5.
Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, M5S 3G9.
Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, M5G 1L7.

Mohammad Islam (M)

Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada, M5G 2C1.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, M5T 1P5.
Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1L5.
Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, M5S 3G9.

Articles similaires

Unsupervised learning for real-time and continuous gait phase detection.

Dollaporn Anopas, Yodchanan Wongsawat, Jetsada Arnin
1.00
Humans Gait Neural Networks, Computer Unsupervised Machine Learning Walking
Humans Shoulder Fractures Tomography, X-Ray Computed Neural Networks, Computer Female
Humans Artificial Intelligence Neoplasms Prognosis Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Humans Deep Learning Mouth Neoplasms Drug Resistance, Neoplasm Cell Line, Tumor

Classifications MeSH