Experimental measurement of ionization chamber angular response and associated magnetic field correction factors in MR-linac.

MR-linac MRgRT dosimetry ionization chamber magnetic field correction factor magnetic fields

Journal

Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Historique:
received: 19 08 2019
revised: 06 01 2020
accepted: 07 01 2020
pubmed: 20 1 2020
medline: 27 1 2021
entrez: 20 1 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To measure ionization chamber dose response as a function of the angle between magnetic field direction and ionization chamber orientation in magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) system, and to evaluate angular dependence of magnetic field correction factor for reference dosimetry. Measurements were performed on an Elekta MR-linac that integrates a 1.5-T Philips MRI and a 7-MV FFF photon beam accelerator. The response of four reference class chambers (Exradin-A19, A1SL, IBA FC65-G, and CC13, paired with a PTW UE electrometer) was studied. An in-house built MR-compatible water tank and an accompanying cylindrical insert that allowed chamber rotation around the cylinder's axis was used. The EPID onboard imaging was used to center chamber at the MR-linac isocenter (143.5 cm, SAD), as well as to verify position at each datapoint. A clear angular dependence of dose response for all chambers has been measured. The most significant effect of magnetic field on relative chamber response in the presence of magnetic field was observed in the orientation when chamber axis is perpendicular to the direction of magnetic field with the tip pointing in the same direction as Lorentz force. This effect is more pronounced for larger volume chambers; the maximum relative variation in the chamber response (between the setup described above and the one where chamber and magnetic field are parallel) is a 5.3% and 4.6% increase for A19 and FC65-G, respectively, and only 2.0% and 1.9% for smaller volume A1SL and CC13 chamber, respectively. We measured the absolute magnitude of the magnetic field correction factor Experimental measurements carried out in this study have verified the optimal orientation of ionization chamber in terms of minimizing effect of magnetic field on the chamber dose response. This study provides a detailed high-resolution measurement of absolute

Identifiants

pubmed: 31955432
doi: 10.1002/mp.14025
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1940-1948

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

© 2020 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Références

Jaffray DA. Image-guided radiotherapy: from current concept to future perspectives. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012;9:688-699.
Raaijmakers AJ, Raaymakers BW, Lagendijk JJ. Magnetic-field-induced dose effects in MR-guided radiotherapy systems: dependence on the magnetic field strength. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53:909-923.
Meijsing I, Raaymakers BW, Raaijmakers AJ, et al. Dosimetry for the MRI accelerator: the impact of a magnetic field on the response of a Farmer NE2571 ionization chamber. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:2993-3002.
Reynolds M, Fallone BG, Rathee S. Dose response of selected ion chambers in applied homogeneous transverse and longitudinal magnetic fields. Med Phys. 2013;40:042102.
Smit K, van Asselen B, Kok JG, Aalbers AH, Lagendijk JJ, Raaymakers BW. Towards reference dosimetry for the MR-linac: magnetic field correction of the ionization chamber reading. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58:5945-5957.
O'Brien DJ, Schupp N, Pencea S, Dolan J, Sawakuchi GO. Dosimetry in the presence of strong magnetic fields. J Phys. 2017;847:012055.
Hackett SL, van Asselen B, Wolthaus JWH, et al. Consequences of air around an ionization chamber: are existing solid phantoms suitable for reference dosimetry on an MR-linac? Med Phys. 2016;43:3961-3968.
O'Brien DJ, Roberts DA, Ibbott GS, Sawakuchi GO. Reference dosimetry in magnetic fields: formalism and ionization chamber correction factors. Med Phys. 2016;43:4915.
Malkov VN, Rogers DWO. Erratum: Monte Carlo study of ionization chamber magnetic field correction factors as a function of angle and beam quality [Med. Phys. 2018;45(2) p. 908-925 (2018)]. Med Phys. 2019;46:5367.
Almond PR, Biggs PJ, Coursey BM, et al. AAPM TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Med Phys. 1999;26:1847-1870.
McEwen M, DeWerd L, Ibbott G, et al. Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon beams. Med Phys. 2014;41:041501.
IAEA. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: an international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water, volume 398 of Technical Report Series, IAEA, Vienna; 2001.
Standard Imaging. Exradin detectors [Brochure]; 2016.
IBA. Detectors for relative and absolute dosimetry [Brochure]; 2018.
D'Souza M, Nusrat H, Iakovenko V, Sahgal A, Renaud J, Sarfehnia A. Water calorimetry in MR-linac: direct measurement of absorbed dose and absolute determination of chamber kQmag. Med Phys. 2020. (Conditionally accepted).
Malkov VN, Rogers DWO. Sensitive volume effects on Monte Carlo calculated ion chamber response in magnetic fields. Med Phys. 2017;44:4854-4858.
de Prez L, Woodings S, de Pooter J, et al. Direct measurement of ion chamber correction factors, kQ and kB, in a 7 MV MRI-linac. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64:105025.
Spindeldreier CK, Schrenk O, Bakenecker A, et al. Radiation dosimetry in magnetic fields with farmer-type ionization chambers: determination of magnetic field correction factors for different magnetic field strengths and field orientations. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62:6708-6728.
Pojtinger S, Kapsch R-P, Dohm OS, Thorwarth D. A finite element method for the determination of the relative response of ionization chambers in MR-linacs: simulation and experimental validation up to 1.5 T. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64:135011.
van Asselen B, Woodings SJ, Hackett SL, et al. A formalism for reference dosimetry in photon beams in the presence of a magnetic field. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63:125008.

Auteurs

Viktor Iakovenko (V)

Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.

Brian Keller (B)

Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.

Arjun Sahgal (A)

Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.

Arman Sarfehnia (A)

Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.

Articles similaires

Humans Ketamine Propofol Pulmonary Atelectasis Female
Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phantoms, Imaging Infant, Newborn Signal-To-Noise Ratio
1.00
Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Infant, Newborn Infant, Premature

Defining multilevel developmental cervical spinal stenosis using MRI.

Prudence W H Cheung, Justin H M Leung, Vivien W Y Lee et al.
1.00
Humans Male Female Magnetic Resonance Imaging Middle Aged

Classifications MeSH