Acetabular custom-made implants for severe acetabular bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature.
Acetabular bone defects
Custom-made acetabular implants
Paprosky classification
Pelvic discontinuity
Revision total hip arthroplasty
Triflanged acetabular custom-made component
Journal
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
ISSN: 1434-3916
Titre abrégé: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9011043
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
21
02
2019
pubmed:
22
1
2020
medline:
22
8
2020
entrez:
22
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The management of acetabular bone loss is a challenging problem in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). The aim of this systematic review is to summarize and critically analyze indications, complications, clinical and radiological outcomes of custom-made acetabular components in rTHA. A systematic review of English literature was performed on Medline. Retrospective or prospective studies with minimum 2 years of follow-up (FU) were included. The PRISMA 2009 flowchart and checklist were considered to edit the review. Rates of intra- or post-operative complications, aseptic loosening (AL), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), reoperations and re-revisions rates were extrapolated. 18 articles with a level of evidence of IV were included. Six hundred and thirty-four acetabular custom components (627 patients) with a mean FU of 58.6 ± 29.8 months were analyzed. The studies showed good clinical and functional outcomes. Custom-made acetabular components allowed a stable fixation with 94.0 ± 5.0% survival rate. The estimated rate of re-operations and re-revisions were 19.3 ± 17.3% and 5.2 ± 4.7%, respectively. The incidence of PJI was 4.0 ± 3.9%. The acetabular custom-made implants represent a reliable solution for pelvic discontinuity and particular cases of bone loss classified as Paprosky Type IIIA-B or type III-IV according to American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons system where the feature of the defect cannot be handled with standard implants. This strategy allows to fit the implant to the residual host bone, bypassing the bony deficiency and restoring hip biomechanics. Satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes at mid-term follow-up are reported in literature.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31960168
doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03334-5
pii: 10.1007/s00402-020-03334-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
415-424Références
Cavagnaro L, Formica M, Basso M, Zanirato A, Divano S, Felli L (2018) Femoral revision with primary cementless stems: a systematic review of the literature. Musculoskelet Surg 102(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-017-0487-7
doi: 10.1007/s12306-017-0487-7
pubmed: 28669102
Burastero G, Basso M, Carrega G, Cavagnaro L, Chiarlone F, Salomone C, Papa G, Felli L (2017) Acetabular spacers in 2-stage hip revision: is it worth it? A single-centre retrospective study. Hip Int 27(2):187–192. https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000446
doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000446
pubmed: 27886355
Osawa Y, Seki T, Takegami Y, Kusano T, Ishiguro N, Hasegawa Y (2019) Failed periacetabular osteotomy leads to acetabular defects during subsequent total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139(5):729–734
doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03174-y
Jakobs O, Schmidl S, Schoof B, Beckmann J, Gehrke T, Gebauer M (2016) Increased risk for extended acetabular reconstruction in failed hip resurfacing as compared to failed total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(3):413–424
doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2364-x
Burastero G, Scarfì S, Ferraris C, Fresia C, Sessarego N, Fruscione F, Monetti F, Scarfò F, Schupbach P, Podestà M, Grappiolo G, Zocchi E (2010) The association of human mesenchymal stem cells with BMP-7 improves bone regeneration of critical-size segmental bone defects in athymic rats. Bone 47(1):117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2010.03.023
doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.03.023
pubmed: 20362702
Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM (1994) Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplast 9(1):33–44
doi: 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90135-X
Berry DJ, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD, Cabanela ME (1999) Pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1692–1702
doi: 10.2106/00004623-199912000-00006
Kosashvili Y, Backstein D, Safir O, Lakstein D, Gross AE (2009) Acetabular revision using an anti-protrusion (ilio-ischial) cage and trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with pelvic discontinuity. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:870–876
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B7.22181
Haddad FS, Shergill N, Muirhead-Allwood SK (1999) Acetabular reconstruction with morcellized allograft and ring support: a medium-term review. J Arthroplast 14(7):788–795
doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90026-8
Solomon LB, Abrahams JM, Callary SA, Howie DW (2018) The stability of the porous tantalum components used in revision THA to treat severe acetabular defects: a radiostereometric analysis study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100(22):1926–1933
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00127
De Meo F, Cacciola G, Bellotti V, Bruschetta A, Cavaliere P (2018) Trabecular Titanium acetabular cups in hip revision surgery: mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes. Hip Int 28:61–65
doi: 10.1177/1120700018812992
Gill TJ, Sledge JB, Müller ME (2000) The management of severe bone loss using structural allograft and acetabular reinforcement devices. J Arthroplast 15:1–7
doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(00)90973-2
Paprosky WG, O’Rourke M, Sporer SM (2005) The treatment of acetabular bone defects with an associated pelvic discontinuity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441:216–220
doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000194311.20901.f9
Ballester Alfaro JJ, Sueiro Fernandez J (2010) Trabecular metal buttress augment and the trabecular metal cup-cage construct in revision hip arthroplasty for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity. Hip Int 20:119–127
doi: 10.5301/HIP.2010.5297
Schatzker J, Wong MK (1999) Acetabular revision: the role of rings and cages. Clin Orthop Relat Res 369:187–197
doi: 10.1097/00003086-199912000-00020
Winter E, Piert M, Volkmann R, Maurer F, Eingartner C, Weise K, Weller S (2001) Allogeneic cancellous bone graft and a Burch–Schneider ring for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:862–867
doi: 10.2106/00004623-200106000-00007
Haddad FS, Shergill N, Muirhead-Allwood SK (1999) Acetabular reconstruction with morsellized allograft and ring support: a medium-term review. J Arthroplast 14:788–795
doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90026-8
Marx A, Beier A, Richter A, Lohmann CH, Halder AM (2016) Major acetabular defects treated with the Burch–Schneider antiprotrusion cage and impaction bone allograft in a large series: a 5- to 7-year follow-up study. Hip Int 26(6):585–590
doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000388
Lie SA, Havelin LI, Furnes ON, Engesaeter LB, Vollset SE (2004) Failure rates for 4762 revision total hip arthroplasties in the norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg 86-B:504–509
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.86B4.14799
OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group (2016) The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2. Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine. http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653 . Accessed Aug 2018
Christie MJ, Barrington SA, Brinson MF, Ruhling ME, DeBoer DK (2001) Bridging massive acetabular defects with the triflange cup: 2-to 9-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 393:216–227
doi: 10.1097/00003086-200112000-00024
Joshi AB, Lee J, Christensen C (2002) Results for a custom acetabular component for acetabular deficiency. J Arthroplast 17(5):643–648
doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.32106
Holt GE, Dennis DA (2004) Use of custom triflanged acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:209–214
doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000150252.19780.74
DeBoer DK, Christie MJ, Brinson MF, Morrison JC (2007) Revision total hip arthroplasty for pelvic discontinuity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:835–840. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00313
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00313
pubmed: 17403808
Taunton MJ, Fehring TK, Edwards P, Bernasek T, Holt GE, Christie MJ (2012) Pelvic discontinuity treated with custom triflange component: a reliable option. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(2):428–434
doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2126-1
Colen S, Harake R, De Haan J et al (2013) A modified custom-made triflanged acetabular reconstruction ring (MCTARR) for revision hip arthroplasty with severe acetabular defects. Acta Orthop Belg 79:71
pubmed: 23547519
Wind MA Jr, Swank ML, Sorger JI (2013) Short-term results of a custom triflange acetabular component for massive acetabular bone loss in revision THA. Orthopedics 36:e260–e265. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20130222-11
doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130222-11
pubmed: 23464943
Friedrich MJ, Schmolders J, Michel RD, Randau TM, Wimmer MD, Kohlhof H, Wirtz DC, Gravius S (2014) Management of severe periacetabular bone loss combined with pelvic discontinuity in revision hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 38(12):2455–2461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2443-6
doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2443-6
pubmed: 25027976
Berasi CC 4th, Berend KR, Adams JB, Ruh EL, Lombardi AV Jr (2015) Are custom triflange acetabular components effective for reconstruction of catastrophic bone loss? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:528e35
doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3969-z
Barlow BT, Oi KK, Lee YY, Carli AV, Choi DS, Bostrom MP (2016) Outcomes of custom flange acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty and predictors of failure. J Arthroplast 31:1057–1064
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.11.016
Mao Y, Xu C, Xu J, Li H, Liu F, Yu D, Zhu Z (2015) The use of customized cages in revision total hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects. Int Orthop 39(10):2023–2030
doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2965-6
Li H, Qu X, Mao Y, Dai K, Zhu Z (2016) Custom acetabular cages offer stable fixation and improved hip scores for revision THA with severe bone defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474:731–740
doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4587-0
Baauw M, van Hellemondt GG, Spruit M (2017) A custom-made acetabular implant for Paprosky type 3 defects. Orthopedics 40(1):e195–e198
doi: 10.3928/01477447-20160902-01
Gladnick BP, Fehring KA, Odum SM, Christie MJ, DeBoer DK, Fehring TK (2018) Midterm survivorship after revision total hip arthroplasty with a custom triflange acetabular component. J Arthroplast 33(2):500–504
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.026
Citak M, Kochsiek L, Gehrke T, Haasper C, Suero EM, Mau H (2018) Preliminary results of a 3D-printed acetabular component in the management of extensive defects. Hip Int 28(3):266–271
doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000561
Berend ME, Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Cates H, Faris P (2018) The patient-specific Triflange acetabular implant for revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with severe acetabular defects: planning, implantation, and results. Bone Joint J 100-B(1 Suppl A):50–54
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0362.R1
Kieser DC, Ailabouni R, Kieser SCJ, Wyatt MC, Armour PC, Coates MH, Hooper GJ (2018) The use of an Ossis custom 3D-printed tri-flanged acetabular implant for major bone loss: minimum 2-year follow-up. Hip Int 28(6):668–674
doi: 10.1177/1120700018760817
Moore KD, McClenny MD, Wills BW (2018) Custom Triflange acetabular components for large acetabular defects: minimum 10-year follow-up. Orthopedics 41(3):e316–e320
doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180213-11
D’Antonio JA, Capello WN, Borden LS, Bargar WL, Bierbaum BF, Boettcher WG, Steinberg ME, Stulberg SD, Wedge JH (1989) Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 243:126–137
Burastero G, Cavagnaro L, Chiarlone F, Innocenti B, Felli L (2018) A case report: custom made porous titanium implants in revision: a new option for complex issues. Open Orthop J 12:525–535. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001812010173
doi: 10.2174/1874325001812010173
Hothi HS, Ilo K, Whittaker RK, Eskelinen A, Skinner JA, Hart AJ (2015) Corrosion of metal modular cup liners. J Arthroplast 30(9):1652–1656
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.022
Kawasaky Y, Egawa H, Hamada D, Takao S, Nakano S, Yasui N (2012) Location of intrapelvic vessels around the acetabulum assessed by three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography: prevention of vascular related complications in total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 17(4):397–406
doi: 10.1007/s00776-012-0227-7
Wyatt MC (2015) Custom 3D-printed acetabular implants in hip surgery: innovative breakthrough or expensive bespoke upgrade? Hip Int 25(4):375–379. https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000294
doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000294
pubmed: 26351112
Mukherjee K, Gupta S (2016) Bone ingrowth around porous-coated acetabular implant: a three-dimensional finite element study using mechanoregulatory algorithm. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 15(2):389–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-015-0696-7
doi: 10.1007/s10237-015-0696-7
pubmed: 26130375
Baauw M, van Hellemondt GG, van Hooff ML, Spruit M (2015) The accuracy of positioning of a custom-made implant within a large acetabular defect at revision arthroplasty of the hip. Bone Joint J 97-B(6):780–785. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.97b6.35129
doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.97b6.35129
pubmed: 26033057
Weber M, Witzmann L, Wieding J, Grifka J, Renkawitz T, Craiovan B (2018) Customized implants for acetabular Paprosky III defects may be positioned with high accuracy in revision hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4193-3
doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4193-3
pubmed: 30306217