Closed circuit xenon delivery for 72h in neonatal piglets following hypoxic insult using an ambient pressure automated control system: Development, technical evaluation and pulmonary effects.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
28
03
2019
accepted:
14
10
2019
entrez:
22
1
2020
pubmed:
22
1
2020
medline:
1
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) for 72h is the standard treatment following neonatal encephalopathy (NE). However, one-third do not benefit and adjunctive therapies are urgently needed. Xenon enhances neuroprotection with TH when administered at 50% concentration within 5hours of hypoxia in experimental studies. Delayed initiation (~10 hours of age) of 30% xenon for 24 hours during TH did not improve early adverse biomarkers in a clinical trial of Xenon+TH vs TH. After hypoxia-ischemia, excitotoxic injury via N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor overactivation lasts days. Since xenon partially inhibits this receptor, we hypothesised that giving 50% xenon throughout the entire 72h TH and rewarming periods would enhance neuroprotection. Xenon costs $30/litre, so a closed-circuit breathing system is desirable with automated fresh gas delivery. Seven mechanically ventilated newborn pigs were randomized to receive 50% inhaled xenon for 72h during hypothermia (rectal-temperature 35°C) and subsequent rewarming following a global hypoxic-ischemic insult (XeHT, N = 4) or under normothermia for 72h (rectal-temperature 38.5°C) following sham insult (XeNT, N = 3). An automated fresh gas delivery system injected oxygen/air/xenon boluses into a closed-circuit based on measured gas concentrations. Median (IQR) xenon consumption was 0.31 L/h (0.18, 0.50) and 0.34L/h (0.32, 0.49) for hypothermic and normothermic groups respectively, 0.34L/h (0.25, 0.53) overall. 92% of 9626 xenon and 69% of 9635 oxygen measurements were within 20% variation from targets. For xenon concentration, the median absolute performance errors for the XeHT and XeNT groups were 6.14% and 3.84% respectively and 4.31% overall. For oxygen these values were 13.42%, 15.05% and 12.4% respectively. There were no adverse pulmonary pathophysiology findings. Clinical problems over the total period included three related to sensors, seven breathing system leaks, ten partial and one complete tracheal tube occlusion episodes. The automated controller functioned as intended maintaining an inhaled xenon concentration close to the 50% target for 72-78h at a xenon cost of $11.1/h.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) for 72h is the standard treatment following neonatal encephalopathy (NE). However, one-third do not benefit and adjunctive therapies are urgently needed. Xenon enhances neuroprotection with TH when administered at 50% concentration within 5hours of hypoxia in experimental studies. Delayed initiation (~10 hours of age) of 30% xenon for 24 hours during TH did not improve early adverse biomarkers in a clinical trial of Xenon+TH vs TH. After hypoxia-ischemia, excitotoxic injury via N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor overactivation lasts days. Since xenon partially inhibits this receptor, we hypothesised that giving 50% xenon throughout the entire 72h TH and rewarming periods would enhance neuroprotection. Xenon costs $30/litre, so a closed-circuit breathing system is desirable with automated fresh gas delivery.
METHODS
Seven mechanically ventilated newborn pigs were randomized to receive 50% inhaled xenon for 72h during hypothermia (rectal-temperature 35°C) and subsequent rewarming following a global hypoxic-ischemic insult (XeHT, N = 4) or under normothermia for 72h (rectal-temperature 38.5°C) following sham insult (XeNT, N = 3). An automated fresh gas delivery system injected oxygen/air/xenon boluses into a closed-circuit based on measured gas concentrations.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Median (IQR) xenon consumption was 0.31 L/h (0.18, 0.50) and 0.34L/h (0.32, 0.49) for hypothermic and normothermic groups respectively, 0.34L/h (0.25, 0.53) overall. 92% of 9626 xenon and 69% of 9635 oxygen measurements were within 20% variation from targets. For xenon concentration, the median absolute performance errors for the XeHT and XeNT groups were 6.14% and 3.84% respectively and 4.31% overall. For oxygen these values were 13.42%, 15.05% and 12.4% respectively. There were no adverse pulmonary pathophysiology findings. Clinical problems over the total period included three related to sensors, seven breathing system leaks, ten partial and one complete tracheal tube occlusion episodes.
CONCLUSION
The automated controller functioned as intended maintaining an inhaled xenon concentration close to the 50% target for 72-78h at a xenon cost of $11.1/h.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31961878
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224447
pii: PONE-D-19-08850
pmc: PMC6974042
doi:
Substances chimiques
Neuroprotective Agents
0
Xenon
3H3U766W84
Oxygen
S88TT14065
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0224447Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : WT14
Pays : United Kingdom
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Dr J Dingley is an unpaid Director of a University start-up company with interests in efficient gas delivery systems. The automated gas delivery system used in this manuscript was not designed by or made by this company. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Jul;123(1):60-73
pubmed: 31122738
Anesthesiology. 2009 May;110(5):986-95
pubmed: 19352153
JAMA. 2016 Mar 15;315(11):1120-8
pubmed: 26978207
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Apr 15;35(8):1037-1044
pubmed: 29285980
Circulation. 1989 Nov;80(5):1198-206
pubmed: 2805258
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1992 Feb;20(1):63-94
pubmed: 1588504
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2009 Apr;29(4):707-14
pubmed: 19142190
Mol Pharmacol. 2004 Feb;65(2):443-52
pubmed: 14742687
Anesth Analg. 2015 Jun;120(6):1331-6
pubmed: 25794112
Epilepsia. 2017 Nov;58(11):1902-1911
pubmed: 28961316
Front Neurol. 2017 Sep 27;8:511
pubmed: 29021779
Pediatr Res. 1996 Nov;40(5):738-48
pubmed: 8910940
Stroke. 2008 Apr;39(4):1307-13
pubmed: 18309163
Br J Anaesth. 1998 Feb;80(2):255-6
pubmed: 9602599
Pediatrics. 2014 May;133(5):809-18
pubmed: 24777219
Anesth Analg. 2007 Nov;105(5):1200-6, table of contents
pubmed: 17959941
PLoS One. 2013 May 30;8(5):e64329
pubmed: 23737979
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2013 Oct;19(10):773-84
pubmed: 23981565
Crit Care Med. 2012 Apr;40(4):1297-303
pubmed: 22425822
Crit Care Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):e250-9
pubmed: 25844699
Neurobiol Dis. 2016 Aug;92(Pt A):102-12
pubmed: 26409031
Pediatr Res. 2015 Jun;77(6):779-83
pubmed: 25760545
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Nov 28;70(21):2652-2660
pubmed: 29169472
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 11;8(1):450
pubmed: 29323183
Kidney Int. 2014 Jan;85(1):112-23
pubmed: 24025645
Anesthesiology. 2007 Nov;107(5):756-67
pubmed: 18073551
Anaesthesia. 2007 Dec;62(12):1251-6
pubmed: 17991262
Anesthesiology. 2006 Jul;105(1):187-97
pubmed: 16810011
Anesth Analg. 2010 Jan 1;110(1):101-9
pubmed: 19861365
Ann Neurol. 2010 Sep;68(3):330-41
pubmed: 20658563
Anesth Analg. 2009 Aug;109(2):451-60
pubmed: 19608817
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Feb;15(2):145-153
pubmed: 26708675
Nature. 1998 Nov 26;396(6709):324
pubmed: 9845069
Heart Lung Circ. 2013 Apr;22(4):276-83
pubmed: 23261327
Anesthesiology. 2012 Dec;117(6):1262-75
pubmed: 23143806