Altitudinal upwards shifts in fungal fruiting in the Alps.
altitudinal gradient
distributional shifts
ecological response
fungal fruiting
fungi
global warming
Journal
Proceedings. Biological sciences
ISSN: 1471-2954
Titre abrégé: Proc Biol Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245157
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 01 2020
29 01 2020
Historique:
entrez:
23
1
2020
pubmed:
23
1
2020
medline:
18
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Many plant and animal species are changing their latitudinal and/or altitudinal distributions in response to climate change, but whether fungi show similar changes is largely unknown. Here, we use historical fungal fruit body records from the European Alps to assess altitudinal changes in fungal fruiting between 1960 and 2010. We observe that many fungal species are fruiting at significantly higher elevations in 2010 compared to 1960, and especially so among soil-dwelling fungi. Wood-decay fungi, being dependent on the presence of one or a few host trees, show a slower response. Species growing at higher elevations changed their altitudinal fruiting patterns significantly more than lowland species. Environmental changes in high altitudes may lead to proportionally stronger responses, since high-altitude species live closer to their physiological limit. These aboveground changes in fruiting patterns probably mirror corresponding shifts in belowground fungal communities, suggesting parallel shifts in important ecosystem functions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31964234
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2348
pmc: PMC7015340
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20192348Références
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Jan 29;287(1919):20192348
pubmed: 31964234
Mol Ecol. 2014 May;23(10):2452-72
pubmed: 24762095
Nat Commun. 2018 Apr 3;9(1):1315
pubmed: 29615626
New Phytol. 2013 Jul;199(1):288-99
pubmed: 23534863
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 23;107(47):20576-81
pubmed: 21059922
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Sep 15;493:1138-51
pubmed: 23953405
Science. 2008 Jun 27;320(5884):1768-71
pubmed: 18583610
New Phytol. 2012 Jan;193(2):465-73
pubmed: 21988714
Science. 2011 Jan 21;331(6015):324-7
pubmed: 21252344
Conserv Biol. 2007 Apr;21(2):534-9
pubmed: 17391203
Appl Veg Sci. 2016 Oct 5;20(2):164-171
pubmed: 30245580
Science. 2013 Mar 29;339(6127):1615-8
pubmed: 23539604
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Sep 4;109(36):14488-93
pubmed: 22908273
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Mar;24(3):1256-1266
pubmed: 29080270
New Phytol. 2015 May;206(3):1145-55
pubmed: 25655082
Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):1024-6
pubmed: 21852500
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 May 22;279(1735):2072-80
pubmed: 22217718
Science. 2008 Oct 10;322(5899):261-4
pubmed: 18845755
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 18;105(11):4197-202
pubmed: 18334647
Science. 2017 Mar 31;355(6332):
pubmed: 28360268
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 Feb;93(1):284-305
pubmed: 28568902
Nat Commun. 2016 Aug 26;7:12643
pubmed: 27561410
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 20;115(8):1848-1853
pubmed: 29378939
Nature. 2011 Oct 19;479(7374):517-20
pubmed: 22012261