Lumacaftor/ivacaftor therapy is associated with reduced hepatic steatosis in cystic fibrosis patients.
Cystic fibrosis
Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator
Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulator
Diabetes mellitus
Liver disease
Lumacaftor/ivacaftor
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
Journal
World journal of hepatology
ISSN: 1948-5182
Titre abrégé: World J Hepatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101532469
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Dec 2019
27 Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
04
09
2019
revised:
28
10
2019
accepted:
25
11
2019
entrez:
23
1
2020
pubmed:
23
1
2020
medline:
23
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Hepatic steatosis is a common form of cystic fibrosis associated liver disease (CFLD) seen in an estimated 15%-60% of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). The pathophysiology and health implications of hepatic steatosis in cystic fibrosis remain largely unknown. In the general population, hepatic steatosis is strongly associated with insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Cystic fibrosis related diabetes (CFRD) impacts 40%-50% of CF adults and is characterized by both insulin insufficiency and insulin resistance. We hypothesized that patients with CFRD would have higher levels of hepatic steatosis than cystic fibrosis patients without diabetes. To determine whether CFRD is associated with hepatic steatosis and to explore the impact of lumacaftor/ivacaftor therapy on hepatic steatosis in CF. Thirty patients with CF were recruited from a tertiary care medical center for this cross-sectional study. Only pancreatic insufficient patients with CFRD or normal glucose tolerance (NGT) were included. Patients with established CFLD, end stage lung disease, or persistently elevated liver enzymes were excluded. Mean magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) proton density fat fraction (PDFF) was obtained for all participants. Clinical characteristics [age, sex, body mass index, percent predicted forced expiratory volume at 1 s (FEV1), lumacaftor/ivacaftor use] and blood chemistries were assessed for possible association with hepatic steatosis. Hepatic steatosis was defined as a mean MRI PDFF > 5%. Patients were grouped by diabetes status (CFRD, NGT) and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator use (lumacaftor/ivacaftor, no lumacaftor/ivacaftor) to determine between group differences. Continuous variables were analyzed with a Wilcoxon rank sum test and discrete variables with a Chi square test or Fisher's exact test. Twenty subjects were included in the final analysis. The median age was 22.3 years (11.3-39.0) and median FEV1 was 77% (33%-105%). Twelve subjects had CFRD and 8 had NGT. Nine subjects were receiving lumacaftor/ivacaftor. The median PDFF was 3.0% (0.0%-21.0%). Six subjects (30%) had hepatic steatosis defined as PDFF > 5%. Hepatic fat fraction was significantly lower in patients receiving lumacaftor/ivacaftor (median, range) (2.0%, 0.0%-6.4%) than in patients not receiving lumacaftor/ivacaftor (4.1%, 2.7-21.0%), Use of the CFTR modulator lumacaftor/ivacaftor was associated with significantly lower hepatic steatosis. No association between CFRD and hepatic steatosis was found in this cohort.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Hepatic steatosis is a common form of cystic fibrosis associated liver disease (CFLD) seen in an estimated 15%-60% of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). The pathophysiology and health implications of hepatic steatosis in cystic fibrosis remain largely unknown. In the general population, hepatic steatosis is strongly associated with insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Cystic fibrosis related diabetes (CFRD) impacts 40%-50% of CF adults and is characterized by both insulin insufficiency and insulin resistance. We hypothesized that patients with CFRD would have higher levels of hepatic steatosis than cystic fibrosis patients without diabetes.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether CFRD is associated with hepatic steatosis and to explore the impact of lumacaftor/ivacaftor therapy on hepatic steatosis in CF.
METHODS
METHODS
Thirty patients with CF were recruited from a tertiary care medical center for this cross-sectional study. Only pancreatic insufficient patients with CFRD or normal glucose tolerance (NGT) were included. Patients with established CFLD, end stage lung disease, or persistently elevated liver enzymes were excluded. Mean magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) proton density fat fraction (PDFF) was obtained for all participants. Clinical characteristics [age, sex, body mass index, percent predicted forced expiratory volume at 1 s (FEV1), lumacaftor/ivacaftor use] and blood chemistries were assessed for possible association with hepatic steatosis. Hepatic steatosis was defined as a mean MRI PDFF > 5%. Patients were grouped by diabetes status (CFRD, NGT) and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator use (lumacaftor/ivacaftor, no lumacaftor/ivacaftor) to determine between group differences. Continuous variables were analyzed with a Wilcoxon rank sum test and discrete variables with a Chi square test or Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Twenty subjects were included in the final analysis. The median age was 22.3 years (11.3-39.0) and median FEV1 was 77% (33%-105%). Twelve subjects had CFRD and 8 had NGT. Nine subjects were receiving lumacaftor/ivacaftor. The median PDFF was 3.0% (0.0%-21.0%). Six subjects (30%) had hepatic steatosis defined as PDFF > 5%. Hepatic fat fraction was significantly lower in patients receiving lumacaftor/ivacaftor (median, range) (2.0%, 0.0%-6.4%) than in patients not receiving lumacaftor/ivacaftor (4.1%, 2.7-21.0%),
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Use of the CFTR modulator lumacaftor/ivacaftor was associated with significantly lower hepatic steatosis. No association between CFRD and hepatic steatosis was found in this cohort.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31966908
doi: 10.4254/wjh.v11.i12.761
pmc: PMC6960296
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
761-772Subventions
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : P30 DK097948
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict-of-interest statement: Flask CA and Kaminski B reports grants from Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, during the conduct of the study. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Références
Hepatology. 1999 Nov;30(5):1151-8
pubmed: 10534335
Diabetes Care. 2009 Sep;32(9):1626-31
pubmed: 19542209
Lancet Respir Med. 2014 Nov;2(11):902-910
pubmed: 25311995
Nat Rev Genet. 2015 Jan;16(1):45-56
pubmed: 25404111
J Cyst Fibros. 2013 Mar;12(2):116-24
pubmed: 23266093
Pediatr Diabetes. 2013 Sep;14(6):417-21
pubmed: 23952705
Hepatology. 2017 Aug;66(2):591-601
pubmed: 28422310
Diabetes Care. 2009 Oct;32(10):1783-8
pubmed: 19592632
Acta Paediatr. 2007 May;96(5):736-9
pubmed: 17381470
Radiology. 2011 Mar;258(3):749-59
pubmed: 21212366
J Pediatr. 2017 Feb;181S:S4-S15.e1
pubmed: 28129811
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Oct;24(5):585-92
pubmed: 20955961
Pediatr Diabetes. 2014 Sep;15 Suppl 20:65-76
pubmed: 25182308
N Engl J Med. 2018 Oct 25;379(17):1612-1620
pubmed: 30334692
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 16;373(3):220-31
pubmed: 25981758
J Cyst Fibros. 2019 Mar;18(2):280-285
pubmed: 30509601
BMC Med Genomics. 2018 Feb 13;11(Suppl 1):13
pubmed: 29504914
World J Hepatol. 2018 Jan 27;10(1):34-40
pubmed: 29399276
Hepatology. 2019 Apr;69(4):1648-1656
pubmed: 30058245
Lancet. 2016 Nov 19;388(10059):2519-2531
pubmed: 27140670
Pediatrics. 1999 Jan;103(1):52-7
pubmed: 9917439
Diabetes Care. 2010 Dec;33(12):2697-708
pubmed: 21115772
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2019 Jan;68(1):96-103
pubmed: 30234762
Paediatr Respir Rev. 2013 May;14 Suppl 1:2-5
pubmed: 23466340
Diabetes Care. 2008 Sep;31(9):1789-94
pubmed: 18535191
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016 Apr;62(4):618-26
pubmed: 26465792
Lancet Respir Med. 2017 Feb;5(2):107-118
pubmed: 28011037
Hepatology. 2018 Jan;67(1):328-357
pubmed: 28714183
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2015 Mar 15;308(6):G459-71
pubmed: 25591863
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 23;377(21):2013-2023
pubmed: 29099344
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015 May;60(5):578-9
pubmed: 25688481
J Cyst Fibros. 2019 Jul;18(4):551-556
pubmed: 30711385
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Feb 1;199(3):342-351
pubmed: 30130412
BMC Pulm Med. 2018 Dec 22;18(1):196
pubmed: 30577776
Ann Surg. 2012 Oct;256(4):624-33
pubmed: 22964732
Curr Diab Rep. 2015 Jun;15(6):607
pubmed: 25894944
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Jul;189(1):89-99
pubmed: 17579157
J Cyst Fibros. 2019 Jan;18(1):144-149
pubmed: 30104123
N Engl J Med. 2018 Oct 25;379(17):1599-1611
pubmed: 30334693
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2007 Nov;13(6):529-36
pubmed: 17901760
J Cyst Fibros. 2018 Mar;17(2):271-275
pubmed: 29249670
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017 Oct;65(4):443-448
pubmed: 28753176
PLoS One. 2010 May 05;5(5):e10446
pubmed: 20463919
Nutr Metab (Lond). 2005 May 03;2(1):11
pubmed: 15869703
J Cyst Fibros. 2008 May;7(3):179-96
pubmed: 18456578
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr;36(2):236-50
pubmed: 25826591
J Cyst Fibros. 2011 Jun;10 Suppl 2:S29-36
pubmed: 21658639
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Aug;100(8):2963-71
pubmed: 26057180