Association of Potentially Modifiable Diabetes Care Factors With Glycemic Control in Patients With Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes.
Aged
Blood Glucose
/ analysis
Cohort Studies
Complementary Therapies
/ methods
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
/ drug therapy
Female
Glycated Hemoglobin
/ analysis
Glycemic Index
/ drug effects
Humans
Hypoglycemic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Insulin
/ therapeutic use
Male
Middle Aged
New Jersey
Retrospective Studies
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 01 2020
03 01 2020
Historique:
entrez:
23
1
2020
pubmed:
23
1
2020
medline:
28
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Numerous factors are associated with the ability of patients with type 2 diabetes to achieve optimal glycemic control. However, many of these factors are not modifiable by quality improvement interventions. In contrast, the structure of how diabetes care is delivered, such as whether patients visit an endocrinologist or how prescriptions are filled, is potentially modifiable, yet its associations with glycemic control have not been rigorously evaluated. To investigate the association of diabetes care delivery with glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes using insulin. This retrospective cohort study used baseline claims and laboratory insurer data within a large pragmatic trial to identify individuals with type 2 diabetes using insulin with data for at least 1 hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) test result from before trial randomization (July 1, 2014, to October 5, 2016) and for key nonmodifiable patient factors as well as diabetes care delivery and behavioral factors measured before the HbA1c test. Analyses were conducted from February 4, 2017, to November 13, 2018. Multivariable modified Poisson regression was used to evaluate the independent associations of nonmodifiable patient factors and potentially modifiable diabetes care delivery and patient behavioral factors with achieving adequate diabetes control (ie, HbA1c level <8%). The extent of measured variation explained in glycemic control by these factors was also explored using pseudo R2 and C statistics. Of 1423 patients included, 565 (39.7%) were women, and the mean (SD) age was 56.4 (9.0) years. In total, 690 (48.5%) had HbA1c levels less than 8%. Age (relative risk [RR] per 1-unit increase, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02), persistent use of basal insulin (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.00-1.43), more frequent filling of glucose self-testing supplies (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.01-1.02), visiting an endocrinologist (RR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.19-1.67), and receipt of insulin prescriptions by mail order (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03-1.48) were all independently associated with adequate control. Measured potentially modifiable diabetes care factors explained more variation in adequate glycemic control than measured nonmodifiable patient factors (C statistic, 0.661 vs 0.598; pseudo R2 = 0.11 vs 0.04). These findings suggest that for patients with type 2 diabetes using insulin, the way in which care is delivered may be more strongly associated with achieving adequate control of HbA1c levels than patient factors that cannot be altered are. Given the potential for intervention, these care delivery factors could be the focus of efforts to improve diabetes outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31968115
pii: 2759125
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19645
pmc: PMC6991273
doi:
Substances chimiques
Blood Glucose
0
Glycated Hemoglobin A
0
Hypoglycemic Agents
0
Insulin
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1919645Références
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 May-Jun;55(6):590-600
pubmed: 23621969
Med Care. 2015 Aug;53(8):720-8
pubmed: 26147866
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Feb;29(2):320-7
pubmed: 24101534
Diabet Med. 2013 May;30(5):512-24
pubmed: 23323988
Med Care. 2005 Jun;43(6):521-30
pubmed: 15908846
Diabetes Educ. 2013 Jan-Feb;39(1):53-65
pubmed: 23192599
Am J Epidemiol. 2003 May 15;157(10):940-3
pubmed: 12746247
Diabetes Care. 1999 Nov;22(11):1790-5
pubmed: 10546009
Am Psychol. 2016 Oct;71(7):539-551
pubmed: 27690483
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190657
pubmed: 30874782
Clin Diabetes. 2018 Jan;36(1):14-37
pubmed: 29382975
J Diabetes Complications. 2010 Mar-Apr;24(2):84-9
pubmed: 19282203
Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:120065
pubmed: 23017247
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911476
pubmed: 31517961
Can J Diabetes. 2016 Oct;40(5):424-430
pubmed: 27291886
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Jun;9(3):1099-1111
pubmed: 29644618
Med Care. 2019 Aug;57(8):592-600
pubmed: 31268954
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Apr 17;168(8):569-576
pubmed: 29507945
J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Nov-Dec;15(9):728-40
pubmed: 19954264
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 May 1;64(5):472-8
pubmed: 23370463
Med Care. 2015 Apr;53(4):332-7
pubmed: 25719517
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Nov;31(11):2474-84
pubmed: 23129678
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 30;7(10):e016551
pubmed: 29084790
J Diabetes. 2017 Apr;9(4):320-324
pubmed: 28070960
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Sep;20(9):2148-2158
pubmed: 29938887
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Apr 15;115(8):1095-101
pubmed: 25724781
J Diabetes Investig. 2014 Sep;5(5):563-9
pubmed: 25411625
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Aug 14;104(33):13225-31
pubmed: 17698965
Circulation. 2014 Feb 18;129(7):754-63
pubmed: 24326988
Diabetes Care. 2002 Sep;25(9):1584-90
pubmed: 12196431
Diabetes Educ. 2007 Nov-Dec;33(6):1014-29; discussion 1030-1
pubmed: 18057270
Diabetes Care. 2011 Jul;34(7):1651-9
pubmed: 21709298
QJM. 2007 Jun;100(6):345-50
pubmed: 17504861
Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;53(2):1227-1247
pubmed: 28474736
Value Health. 2008 Jan-Feb;11(1):44-7
pubmed: 18237359
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Aug 7;169(3):165-174
pubmed: 29987326
Diabetes Care. 2000 Apr;23(4):472-6
pubmed: 10857937
BMC Endocr Disord. 2015 Sep 09;15:46
pubmed: 26353820
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Apr;138:128-137
pubmed: 29427695
Diabet Med. 2012 May;29(5):682-9
pubmed: 22313123