The Alopecia Areata Investigator Global Assessment scale: a measure for evaluating clinically meaningful success in clinical trials.


Journal

The British journal of dermatology
ISSN: 1365-2133
Titre abrégé: Br J Dermatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0004041

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2020
Historique:
accepted: 16 01 2020
pubmed: 24 1 2020
medline: 15 5 2021
entrez: 24 1 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Content-valid and clinically meaningful instruments are required to evaluate outcomes of therapeutic interventions in alopecia areata (AA). To develop an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) to interpret treatment response in AA treatment studies. Qualitative interviews were conducted in the USA with expert dermatologists and with patients with AA who had experienced ≥ 50% scalp-hair loss. Thematic data analysis identified critical outcomes and evaluated the content validity of the new IGA. Expert clinicians (n = 10) judged AA treatment success by the amount of scalp-hair growth (median 80% scalp hair). Adult (n = 25) and adolescent (n = 5) patients participated. Scalp-hair loss was the most bothersome AA sign/symptom for most patients. Perceived treatment success - short of 100% scalp hair - was the presence of ~ 70-90% scalp hair (median 80%). Using additional clinician and patient insights, the Alopecia Areata Investigator Global Assessment (AA-IGA™) was developed. This clinician-reported outcome assessment is an ordinal, static measure comprising five severity categories of scalp-hair loss. Nearly all clinicians and patients in this study agreed that, for patients with ≥ 50% scalp-hair loss, successful treatment would be hair regrowth resulting in ≤ 20% scalp-hair loss. We recommend using the Severity of Alopecia Tool to assess the extent (0-100%) of scalp-hair loss. The AA-IGA is a robust ordinal measure providing distinct and clinically meaningful gradations of scalp-hair loss that reflects patients' and expert clinicians' perspectives and treatment expectations. What is already known about this topic? The Severity of Alopecia Tool is widely used to assess the extent of scalp-hair loss in patients with alopecia areata. Guidelines define treatment success as a 50% improvement in scalp hair, and clinical trials have used dynamic thresholds of 50% and 90%. However, there is no clinical consensus on these endpoints, and patient perspectives on treatment success are unknown. What does this study add? Through qualitative interviews with 10 expert dermatologists and 30 patients with alopecia areata who had experienced ≥ 50% scalp-hair loss, we developed the Alopecia Areata Investigator Global Assessment (AA-IGA™) to measure five clinically meaningful gradations of alopecia areata scalp-hair loss that reflects patients' and clinicians' perspectives and expectations of treatment success in alopecia areata treatment studies. What are the clinical implications of this work? The AA-IGA is a robust ordinal measure that can inform clinical evaluation of alopecia areata treatment outcomes. The AA-IGA can be used to determine clinically meaningful treatment success for alopecia areata, with success defined by patients and clinicians as reaching ≤ 20% scalp-hair loss. Linked Comment: Blome. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:609.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Content-valid and clinically meaningful instruments are required to evaluate outcomes of therapeutic interventions in alopecia areata (AA).
OBJECTIVES
To develop an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) to interpret treatment response in AA treatment studies.
METHODS
Qualitative interviews were conducted in the USA with expert dermatologists and with patients with AA who had experienced ≥ 50% scalp-hair loss. Thematic data analysis identified critical outcomes and evaluated the content validity of the new IGA.
RESULTS
Expert clinicians (n = 10) judged AA treatment success by the amount of scalp-hair growth (median 80% scalp hair). Adult (n = 25) and adolescent (n = 5) patients participated. Scalp-hair loss was the most bothersome AA sign/symptom for most patients. Perceived treatment success - short of 100% scalp hair - was the presence of ~ 70-90% scalp hair (median 80%). Using additional clinician and patient insights, the Alopecia Areata Investigator Global Assessment (AA-IGA™) was developed. This clinician-reported outcome assessment is an ordinal, static measure comprising five severity categories of scalp-hair loss. Nearly all clinicians and patients in this study agreed that, for patients with ≥ 50% scalp-hair loss, successful treatment would be hair regrowth resulting in ≤ 20% scalp-hair loss.
CONCLUSIONS
We recommend using the Severity of Alopecia Tool to assess the extent (0-100%) of scalp-hair loss. The AA-IGA is a robust ordinal measure providing distinct and clinically meaningful gradations of scalp-hair loss that reflects patients' and expert clinicians' perspectives and treatment expectations. What is already known about this topic? The Severity of Alopecia Tool is widely used to assess the extent of scalp-hair loss in patients with alopecia areata. Guidelines define treatment success as a 50% improvement in scalp hair, and clinical trials have used dynamic thresholds of 50% and 90%. However, there is no clinical consensus on these endpoints, and patient perspectives on treatment success are unknown. What does this study add? Through qualitative interviews with 10 expert dermatologists and 30 patients with alopecia areata who had experienced ≥ 50% scalp-hair loss, we developed the Alopecia Areata Investigator Global Assessment (AA-IGA™) to measure five clinically meaningful gradations of alopecia areata scalp-hair loss that reflects patients' and clinicians' perspectives and expectations of treatment success in alopecia areata treatment studies. What are the clinical implications of this work? The AA-IGA is a robust ordinal measure that can inform clinical evaluation of alopecia areata treatment outcomes. The AA-IGA can be used to determine clinically meaningful treatment success for alopecia areata, with success defined by patients and clinicians as reaching ≤ 20% scalp-hair loss. Linked Comment: Blome. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:609.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31970750
doi: 10.1111/bjd.18883
pmc: PMC7586961
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

702-709

Subventions

Organisme : Eli Lilly and Company
Pays : International

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.

Références

Ann Dermatol. 2017 Oct;29(5):565-570
pubmed: 28966512
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005 Jun;52(6):1082-4
pubmed: 15928633
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Jan;76(1):29-32
pubmed: 27816292
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Sep;79(3):556-558.e1
pubmed: 29425723
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999 Feb;40(2 Pt 1):242-6
pubmed: 10025752
J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2013 Dec;16(1):S42-4
pubmed: 24326551
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Jan;76(1):22-28
pubmed: 27816293
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Feb;80(2):e45
pubmed: 30244065
Adv Ther. 2017 Jul;34(7):1594-1609
pubmed: 28646393
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Oct 11;4:79
pubmed: 17034633
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004 Sep;51(3):440-7
pubmed: 15337988
Value Health. 2015 Sep;18(6):741-52
pubmed: 26409600
Arch Dermatol Res. 2018 Oct;310(8):607-614
pubmed: 30121698
Value Health. 2018 Jul;21(7):839-842
pubmed: 30005756
Value Health. 2017 Jan;20(1):2-14
pubmed: 28212963
JCI Insight. 2016 Sep 22;1(15):e89776
pubmed: 27699252
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Sep;79(3):470-478.e3
pubmed: 29128463
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Mar 12;:
pubmed: 32163589
JCI Insight. 2016 Sep 22;1(15):e89790
pubmed: 27699253

Auteurs

K W Wyrwich (KW)

Patient-Focused Outcomes Center of Expertise, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

H Kitchen (H)

Lilly Bio-Medicines, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

S Knight (S)

Lilly Bio-Medicines, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

N V J Aldhouse (NVJ)

Lilly Bio-Medicines, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

J Macey (J)

Lilly Bio-Medicines, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

F P Nunes (FP)

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, DRG Abacus, Manchester, UK.

Y Dutronc (Y)

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, DRG Abacus, Manchester, UK.

N Mesinkovska (N)

Dermatology Clinical Research Center, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.

J M Ko (JM)

Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

B A King (BA)

Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH