Comparison of propagation-based CT using synchrotron radiation and conventional cone-beam CT for breast imaging.


Journal

European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2020
Historique:
received: 03 06 2019
accepted: 31 10 2019
revised: 29 10 2019
pubmed: 25 1 2020
medline: 3 11 2020
entrez: 25 1 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To evaluate and compare the image quality of propagation-based phase-contrast computed tomography (PB-CT) using synchrotron radiation and conventional cone-beam breast computed tomography (CBBCT) based on various radiological image quality criteria. Eight excised breast tissue samples of various sizes and containing different lesion types were scanned using PB-CT at a synchrotron facility and using CBBCT at a university-affiliated breast imaging centre. PB-CT scans were performed at two different mean glandular dose (MGD) levels: standard (5.8 mGy) and low (1.5 mGy), for comparison with CBBCT scans at the standard MGD (5.8 mGy). Image quality assessment was carried out using six quality criteria and six independent medical imaging experts in a reading room with mammography workstations. The interobserver agreement between readers was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and image quality was compared between the two breast imaging modalities using the area under the visual grading characteristic curve (AUC Interobserver agreement between the readers showed moderate reliability for five image criteria (ICC: ranging from 0.488 to 0.633) and low reliability for one criterion (image noise) (ICC 0.307). For five image quality criteria (overall quality, perceptible contrast, lesion sharpness, normal tissue interfaces, and calcification visibility), both standard-dose PB-CT images (AUC Synchrotron-based PB-CT can achieve a significantly higher radiological image quality at a substantially lower radiation dose compared with conventional CBBCT. • PB-CT using synchrotron radiation results in higher image quality than conventional CBBCT for breast imaging. • PB-CT using synchrotron radiation requires a lower radiation dose than conventional CBBCT for breast imaging. • PB-CT can help clinicians diagnose patients with breast cancer.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31974689
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06567-0
pii: 10.1007/s00330-019-06567-0
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2740-2750

Subventions

Organisme : National Health and Medical Research Council
ID : APP1138283

Références

Biomed Opt Express. 2015 Jul 29;6(8):3099-112
pubmed: 26309770
Eur Radiol Exp. 2019 May 21;3(1):19
pubmed: 31115796
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2019 Jul;6(3):031402
pubmed: 30525064
Radiology. 2011 Jun;259(3):684-94
pubmed: 21436089
Ann Oncol. 2008 Apr;19(4):614-22
pubmed: 18024988
Clin Imaging. 2017 Mar - Apr;42:50-59
pubmed: 27875762
Radiology. 2015 Jan;274(1):85-92
pubmed: 25188431
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Nov 6;109(45):18290-4
pubmed: 23091003
J Microsc. 2002 Apr;206(Pt 1):33-40
pubmed: 12000561
Breast J. 2014 Jul-Aug;20(4):364-74
pubmed: 24934253
Eur Radiol. 2018 Sep;28(9):3729-3730
pubmed: 29846805
Br J Radiol. 2007 Mar;80(951):169-76
pubmed: 16854962
Med Phys. 2007 Jul;34(7):2995-3004
pubmed: 17822008
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2015 Nov;22(6):1509-23
pubmed: 26524316
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Feb 21;61(4):1634-49
pubmed: 26836274
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Feb;85(2):392-403
pubmed: 26781145
Eur Radiol. 2019 Mar;29(3):1194-1202
pubmed: 30255249
Phys Med Biol. 1998 Oct;43(10):2845-52
pubmed: 9814522
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016 Jun;169(1-4):46-53
pubmed: 26769908
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Jan 21;61(2):569-87
pubmed: 26683710
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Mar 21;62(6):2315-2332
pubmed: 28140377
N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 27;353(17):1773-83
pubmed: 16169887
Radiology. 2000 Feb;214(2):547-52
pubmed: 10671609
Radiology. 2008 Mar;246(3):725-33
pubmed: 18195383
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
pubmed: 18839484
Sci Rep. 2015 Jul 29;5:12509
pubmed: 26219661
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Dec 18;63(24):24NT03
pubmed: 30524112
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Jul 5;92(13):1081-7
pubmed: 10880551
Radiology. 2013 Apr;267(1):47-56
pubmed: 23297332
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Jun 21;56(12):3503-12
pubmed: 21606555
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Aug 21;60(16):N311-23
pubmed: 26267405
JAMA. 2016 Apr 26;315(16):1784-6
pubmed: 27115381
Eur Radiol. 2018 Sep;28(9):3731-3741
pubmed: 29594402
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2014 Jan 27;372(2010):20130025
pubmed: 24470410
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Aug;195(2):496-509
pubmed: 20651210
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2019 Jul 1;26(Pt 4):1343-1353
pubmed: 31274463
Med Phys. 2019 Dec;46(12):5478-5487
pubmed: 31574166
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018 May;65(5):1117-1123
pubmed: 28829304
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Jul;211(1):133-145
pubmed: 29792739
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):583-9
pubmed: 23623721
Med Phys. 2012 Aug;39(8):4761-74
pubmed: 22894401
Acad Radiol. 2019 Jun;26(6):e79-e89
pubmed: 30149975
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 10;14(1):e0210256
pubmed: 30629713
Clin Radiol. 2013 May;68(5):e225-36
pubmed: 23465326
Lancet. 2012 Nov 17;380(9855):1778-86
pubmed: 23117178

Auteurs

Seyedamir Tavakoli Taba (S)

The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, New South Wales, 2141, Australia. amir.tavakoli@sydney.edu.au.

Patrycja Baran (P)

The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.

Yakov I Nesterets (YI)

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, 2351, Australia.

Serena Pacile (S)

Elettra - Sincrotrone, Basovizza, 34149, Trieste, Italy.

Susanne Wienbeck (S)

University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075, Gottingen, Lower Saxony, Germany.

Christian Dullin (C)

Elettra - Sincrotrone, Basovizza, 34149, Trieste, Italy.
University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075, Gottingen, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Max-Planck-Institute for Experimental Medicine, 37075, Gottingen, Lower Saxony, Germany.

Konstantin Pavlov (K)

University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, 2351, Australia.
University of Canterbury, Christchurch, 8041, New Zealand.
Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia.

Anton Maksimenko (A)

Australian Synchrotron, ANSTO, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.

Darren Lockie (D)

Maroondah BreastScreen, EasternHealth, Ringwood, Victoria, 3135, Australia.

Sheridan C Mayo (SC)

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.

Harry M Quiney (HM)

The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.

Diego Dreossi (D)

Elettra - Sincrotrone, Basovizza, 34149, Trieste, Italy.

Fulvia Arfelli (F)

University of Trieste and INFN, 34149, Trieste, Italy.

Giuliana Tromba (G)

Elettra - Sincrotrone, Basovizza, 34149, Trieste, Italy.

Sarah Lewis (S)

The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, New South Wales, 2141, Australia.

Timur E Gureyev (TE)

The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, New South Wales, 2141, Australia.
The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, 2351, Australia.
Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia.

Patrick C Brennan (PC)

The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, New South Wales, 2141, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH