Sedentary Behaviour and Diabetes Information as a Source of Motivation to Reduce Daily Sitting Time in Office Workers: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial.
Adult
Diabetes Mellitus
/ prevention & control
Exercise
/ psychology
Female
Goals
Health Behavior
/ physiology
Health Promotion
/ methods
Humans
Intention
Male
Middle Aged
Motivation
/ physiology
Pilot Projects
Sedentary Behavior
Self Efficacy
Sitting Position
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Workplace
health action process approach
intentions
intervention
motivation
sedentary behaviour
Journal
Applied psychology. Health and well-being
ISSN: 1758-0854
Titre abrégé: Appl Psychol Health Well Being
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101502957
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2020
07 2020
Historique:
received:
10
09
2019
revised:
05
12
2019
accepted:
05
12
2019
pubmed:
25
1
2020
medline:
21
9
2021
entrez:
25
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Using the motivational phase of the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA), this study examined whether sedentary behaviour and diabetes information is a meaningful source of motivation to reduce daily sitting time among preintending office workers. Participants (N = 218) were randomised into HAPA-intervention (sedentary behaviour), HAPA-attention control (physical activity), or control (no treatment) conditions. Following treatment, purpose-built sedentary-related HAPA motivational constructs (risk perception, outcome expectancies, self-efficacy) and goal intentions were assessed. Only participants who had given little thought to how much time they spent sitting (preintenders) were used in subsequent analyses (n = 96). Significant main effects favouring the intervention group were reported for goal intentions: to increase number and length of daily breaks from sitting at work; to reduce daily sitting time outside of work; to increase daily time spent standing outside of work, as well as for outcome expectancies (p values ≤ .05; ɳ A brief, HAPA-based online intervention providing information regarding sedentary behaviour and diabetes risk may be an effective source of motivation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Using the motivational phase of the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA), this study examined whether sedentary behaviour and diabetes information is a meaningful source of motivation to reduce daily sitting time among preintending office workers.
METHODS
Participants (N = 218) were randomised into HAPA-intervention (sedentary behaviour), HAPA-attention control (physical activity), or control (no treatment) conditions. Following treatment, purpose-built sedentary-related HAPA motivational constructs (risk perception, outcome expectancies, self-efficacy) and goal intentions were assessed. Only participants who had given little thought to how much time they spent sitting (preintenders) were used in subsequent analyses (n = 96).
RESULTS
Significant main effects favouring the intervention group were reported for goal intentions: to increase number and length of daily breaks from sitting at work; to reduce daily sitting time outside of work; to increase daily time spent standing outside of work, as well as for outcome expectancies (p values ≤ .05; ɳ
CONCLUSIONS
A brief, HAPA-based online intervention providing information regarding sedentary behaviour and diabetes risk may be an effective source of motivation.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
449-470Informations de copyright
© 2019 The International Association of Applied Psychology.
Références
Altman, D.G. (2009). Missing outcomes in randomized trials: Addressing the dilemma. Open Medicine, 3(2), 51-53.
Bennie, J.A., Pedisic, Z., Timperio, A., Crawford, D., Dunstan, D., Bauman, A., … Salmon, J. (2015). Total and domain-specific sitting time among employees in desk-based work settings in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 39(3), 237-242.
Carson, V., Wong, S.L., Winkler, E., Healy, G.N., Colley, R.C., & Tremblay, M.S. (2014). Patterns of sedentary time and cardiometabolic risk among Canadian adults. Preventive Medicine, 65, 23-27.
De Cocker, K., Duncan, M.J., Short, C., van Uffelen, J.G., & Vandelanotte, C. (2014). Understanding occupational sitting: Prevalence, correlates and moderating effects in Australian employees. Preventive Medicine, 67, 288-294.
Cole, J.A., Tully, M.A., & Cupples, M.E. (2015). “They should stay at their desk until the work’s done”: A qualitative study examining perceptions of sedentary behaviour in a desk-based occupational setting. BMC Research Notes, 8(1), 683.
Colley, R.C., Garriguet, D., Janssen, I., Craig, C.L., Clarke, J., & Tremblay, M.S. (2011). Physical activity of Canadian adults: Accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Reports, 22(1), 7.
Conroy, D.E., Maher, J.P., Elavsky, S., Hyde, A.L., & Doerksen, S.E. (2013). Sedentary behavior as a daily process regulated by habits and intentions. Health Psychology, 32(11), 1149-1157.
Davies, K.A.B., Sprung, V.S., Norman, J.A., Thompson, A., Mitchell, K.L., Halford, J.C., … Cuthbertson, D.J. (2018). Short-term decreased physical activity with increased sedentary behaviour causes metabolic derangements and altered body composition: Effects in individuals with and without a first-degree relative with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia, 61(6), 1282-1294.
de Rezende, L.F.M., Lopes, M.R., Rey-López, J.P., Matsudo, V.K.R., & Luiz Odo, C. (2014). Sedentary behavior and health outcomes: An overview of systematic reviews. PLoS ONE, 9(8), e105620.
Dunn, D.S., & Elliott, T.R. (2008). The place and promise of theory in rehabilitation psychology research. Rehabilitation Psychology, 53(3), 254-267.
Dunstan, D.W., Howard, B., Healy, G.N., & Owen, N. (2012). Too much sitting-A health hazard. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 97(3), 368-376.
Gaston, A., De Jesus, S., Markland, D., & Prapavessis, H. (2016). I sit because I have fun when I do so! Using self-determination theory to understand sedentary behavior motivation among university students and staff. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 138-154.
Glanz, K., & Bishop, D.B. (2010). The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Annual Review of Public Health, 31(1), 399-418.
Godin, G., & Shephard, R.J. (1997). Godin leisure-time exercise questionnaire. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 29(6), S36-S38.
Graham, S.P., Prapavessis, H., & Cameron, L.D. (2006). Colon cancer information as a source of exercise motivation. Psychology and Health, 21(6), 739-755.
Healy, G.N., Winkler, E.A., Owen, N., Anuradha, S., & Dunstan, D.W. (2015). Replacing sitting time with standing or stepping: Associations with cardio-metabolic risk biomarkers. European Heart Journal, 36(39), 2643-2649.
Kozey-Keadle, S., Libertine, A., Staudenmayer, J., & Freedson, P. (2012). The feasibility of reducing and measuring sedentary time among overweight, non-exercising office workers. Journal of Obesity, 2012, 1-10.
Latimer, A.E., Brawley, L.R., & Bassett, R.L. (2010). A systematic review of three approaches for constructing physical activity messages: What messages work and what improvements are needed? International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 7(1), 36.
Maddux, J.E. (1995). Looking for common ground: A comment on Kirsch and Bandura. In J.E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 347-375). New York: Plenum.
Maddux, J.E., & Gosselin, J.T. (2003). Self-efficacy. In M.R. Leary & J. Price Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 218-238). New York: Guilford Press.
Maher, J.P., & Conroy, D.E. (2016). A dual-process model of older adults’ sedentary behavior. Health Psychology, 35(3), 262-272.
McAuley, E., & Mihalko, S.L. (1998). Measuring exercise-related self-efficacy. In J.L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurements (pp. 371-390). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
Neuhaus, M., Healy, G.N., Dunstan, D.W., Owen, N., & Eakin, E.G. (2014). Workplace sitting and height-adjustable workstations: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 46(1), 30-40.
Osborne, J.W., & Overbay, A. (2004). The power of outliers (and why researchers should always check for them). Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(6), 1-12.
Pope, J.P., Pelletier, L., & Guertin, C. (2017). Starting off on the best foot: A review of message framing and message tailoring, and recommendations for the comprehensive messaging strategy for sustained behavior change. Health Communication, 33(9), 1068-1077.
Prapavessis, H., Gaston, A., & DeJesus, S. (2015). The Theory of Planned Behavior as a model for understanding sedentary behavior. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 19, 23-32.
Rollo, S., Gaston, A., & Prapavessis, H. (2016). Cognitive and motivational factors associated with sedentary behavior: A systematic review. AIMS Public Health, 3(4), 956-984.
Rosenberg, D.E., Norman, G.J., Wagner, N., Patrick, K., Calfas, K.J., & Sallis, J.F. (2010). Reliability and validity of the Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ) for adults. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 7(6), 697-705.
Saunders, T.J., Larouche, R., Colley, R.C., & Tremblay, M.S. (2012). Acute sedentary behaviour and markers of cardiometabolic risk: A systematic review of intervention studies. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism, 2012, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/712435.
Schwarzer, R. (2008). Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57(1), 1-29.
Shrestha, N., Kukkonen-Harjula, K.T., Verbeek, J.H., Ijaz, S., Hermans, V., & Bhaumik, S. (2016). Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, CD010912. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub3
Smith, L., Hamer, M., Ucci, M., Marmot, A., Gardner, B., Sawyer, A., … Fisher, A. (2015). Weekday and weekend patterns of objectively measured sitting, standing, and stepping in a sample of office-based workers: The active buildings study. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 9.
Sui, W., & Prapavessis, H. (2017). Standing up for student health: An application of the health action process approach for reducing student sedentary behavior-Randomised control pilot trial. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 10(1), 87-107.
Thorp, A.A., Healy, G.N., Winkler, E., Clark, B.K., Gardiner, P.A., Owen, N., & Dunstan, D.W. (2012). Prolonged sedentary time and physical activity in workplace and non-work contexts: A cross-sectional study of office, customer service and call centre employees. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 128.
Tremblay, M.S., Aubert, S., Barnes, J.D., Saunders, T.J., Carson, V., Latimer-Cheung, A.E., … Chinapaw, M.J. (2017). Sedentary behavior research network (SBRN)-Terminology consensus project process and outcome. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14(1), 75.
Waters, C.N., Ling, E.P., Chu, A.H., Ng, S.H., Chia, A., Lim, Y.W., & Müller-Riemenschneider, F. (2016). Assessing and understanding sedentary behaviour in office-based working adults: A mixed-method approach. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 360.
Wong, T.S., Gaston, A., DeJesus, S., & Prapavessis, H. (2016). The utility of a protection motivation theory framework for understanding sedentary behavior. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 29-48.