Eplerenone for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy in patients with active, previously untreated disease for more than 4 months (VICI): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Adult
Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
/ drug therapy
Chronic Disease
Double-Blind Method
Eplerenone
/ adverse effects
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Medication Adherence
/ statistics & numerical data
Middle Aged
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists
/ adverse effects
Treatment Outcome
Visual Acuity
/ drug effects
Young Adult
Journal
Lancet (London, England)
ISSN: 1474-547X
Titre abrégé: Lancet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985213R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 01 2020
25 01 2020
Historique:
received:
20
08
2019
revised:
07
11
2019
accepted:
15
11
2019
entrez:
27
1
2020
pubmed:
27
1
2020
medline:
7
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR), fluid accumulates in the subretinal space. CSCR is a common visually disabling condition that develops in individuals up to 60 years of age, and there is no definitive treatment. Previous research suggests the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, eplerenone, is effective for treating CSCR; however, this drug is not licensed for the treatment of patients with CSCR. We aimed to evaluate whether eplerenone was superior to placebo in terms of improving visual acuity in patients with chronic CSCR. This randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre placebo-controlled trial was done at 22 hospitals in the UK. Participants were eligible if they were aged 18-60 years and had had treatment-naive CSCR for 4 months or more. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the eplerenone or the placebo group by a trial statistician through a password-protected system online. Allocation was stratified by best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and hospital. Patients were given either oral eplerenone (25 mg/day for 1 week, increasing to 50 mg/day for up to 12 months) plus usual care or placebo plus usual care for up to 12 months. All participants, care teams, outcome assessors, pharmacists, and members of the trial management group were masked to the treatment allocation. The primary outcome was BCVA, measured as letters read, at 12 months. All outcomes apart from safety were analysed on a modified intention-to-treat basis (participants who withdrew consent without contributing a post-randomisation BCVA measurement were excluded from the primary analysis population and from most secondary analysis populations). The trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN92746680, and is completed. Between Jan 11, 2017, and Feb 22, 2018, we enrolled and randomly assigned 114 patients to receive either eplerenone (n=57) or placebo (n=57). Three participants in the placebo group withdrew consent without contributing a post-randomisation BCVA measurement and were excluded from the primary outcome analysis population. All patients from the eplerenone group and 54 patients from the placebo group were included in the primary outcome. Modelled mean BCVA at 12 months was 79·5 letters (SD 4·5) in the placebo group and 80·4 letters (4·6) in the eplerenone group, with an adjusted estimated mean difference of 1·73 letters (95% CI -1·12 to 4·57; p=0·24) at 12 months. Hyperkalaemia occurred in eight (14%) patients in each group. No serious adverse events were reported in the eplerenone group and three unrelated serious adverse events were reported in the placebo group (myocardial infarction [anticipated], diverticulitis [unanticipated], and metabolic surgery [unanticipated]). Eplerenone was not superior to placebo for improving BCVA in people with chronic CSCR after 12 months of treatment. Ophthalmologists who currently prescribe eplerenone for CSCR should discontinue this practice. Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme, and National Institute for Health Research and Social Care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR), fluid accumulates in the subretinal space. CSCR is a common visually disabling condition that develops in individuals up to 60 years of age, and there is no definitive treatment. Previous research suggests the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, eplerenone, is effective for treating CSCR; however, this drug is not licensed for the treatment of patients with CSCR. We aimed to evaluate whether eplerenone was superior to placebo in terms of improving visual acuity in patients with chronic CSCR.
METHODS
This randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre placebo-controlled trial was done at 22 hospitals in the UK. Participants were eligible if they were aged 18-60 years and had had treatment-naive CSCR for 4 months or more. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the eplerenone or the placebo group by a trial statistician through a password-protected system online. Allocation was stratified by best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and hospital. Patients were given either oral eplerenone (25 mg/day for 1 week, increasing to 50 mg/day for up to 12 months) plus usual care or placebo plus usual care for up to 12 months. All participants, care teams, outcome assessors, pharmacists, and members of the trial management group were masked to the treatment allocation. The primary outcome was BCVA, measured as letters read, at 12 months. All outcomes apart from safety were analysed on a modified intention-to-treat basis (participants who withdrew consent without contributing a post-randomisation BCVA measurement were excluded from the primary analysis population and from most secondary analysis populations). The trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN92746680, and is completed.
FINDINGS
Between Jan 11, 2017, and Feb 22, 2018, we enrolled and randomly assigned 114 patients to receive either eplerenone (n=57) or placebo (n=57). Three participants in the placebo group withdrew consent without contributing a post-randomisation BCVA measurement and were excluded from the primary outcome analysis population. All patients from the eplerenone group and 54 patients from the placebo group were included in the primary outcome. Modelled mean BCVA at 12 months was 79·5 letters (SD 4·5) in the placebo group and 80·4 letters (4·6) in the eplerenone group, with an adjusted estimated mean difference of 1·73 letters (95% CI -1·12 to 4·57; p=0·24) at 12 months. Hyperkalaemia occurred in eight (14%) patients in each group. No serious adverse events were reported in the eplerenone group and three unrelated serious adverse events were reported in the placebo group (myocardial infarction [anticipated], diverticulitis [unanticipated], and metabolic surgery [unanticipated]).
INTERPRETATION
Eplerenone was not superior to placebo for improving BCVA in people with chronic CSCR after 12 months of treatment. Ophthalmologists who currently prescribe eplerenone for CSCR should discontinue this practice.
FUNDING
Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme, and National Institute for Health Research and Social Care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31982075
pii: S0140-6736(19)32981-2
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32981-2
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists
0
Eplerenone
6995V82D0B
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
294-303Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_16004
Pays : United Kingdom
Investigateurs
Samir Bellani
(S)
Helen Griffiths
(H)
Suresh Thulasidharan
(S)
Catrin Watkins
(C)
Rebecca Kaye
(R)
Deepthy Menon
(D)
Qin Neville
(Q)
Rebecca Denham
(R)
Karen Gillvray
(K)
Salwa Abugreen
(S)
Natalie Nixon
(N)
Mohammed Alarbi
(M)
Faruque Ghanchi
(F)
Zeid Madanat
(Z)
Nicola Hawes
(N)
Edward Hughes
(E)
Campbell Keir
(C)
Krystian Kisza
(K)
Clare Bailey
(C)
Phillippa Hazlewood
(P)
Julie Cloake
(J)
Geeta Menon
(G)
Manju Chandran
(M)
Abigail Raguro
(A)
Moin Mohamed
(M)
Wei Sing Lim
(WS)
Haralabos Eleftheriadis
(H)
Stefanos Efraimidis
(S)
Martin McKibbin
(M)
Raj Mukherjee
(R)
Joanne Wilson
(J)
Pauline Lenfestey
(P)
Simon Harding
(S)
Kelly Haigh
(K)
Ramandeep Chhabra
(R)
Mania Horani
(M)
Raisa-Marie Platt
(RM)
James Talks
(J)
Devanga Bhatia
(D)
Violet Andrews
(V)
Susan Downes
(S)
Ivy Samuel
(I)
Daniel Buttress
(D)
Sergio Pagliarini
(S)
Linzi Randle
(L)
Jeanette Allison
(J)
Christopher Brand
(C)
Maria Edwards
(M)
Niral Karia
(N)
Maria Shipman
(M)
Elridge Thompson
(E)
Ajay Kotagiri
(A)
David Steel
(D)
Steven Dodds
(S)
Stephen Turner
(S)
Yinka Osoba
(Y)
Sharon Criddle
(S)
Yit Yang
(Y)
Niro Narendran
(N)
Meena Karpoor
(M)
Richard Gale
(R)
Archana Airody
(A)
Alison Grice-Holt
(A)
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.