The Ottawa model for nursing curriculum renewal: An integrative review.

Curriculum revision Integrative review Logic modelling Ottawa model for nursing curriculum renewal Undergraduate nursing education, curriculum development

Journal

Nurse education today
ISSN: 1532-2793
Titre abrégé: Nurse Educ Today
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 8511379

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Historique:
received: 09 06 2019
revised: 17 10 2019
accepted: 12 01 2020
pubmed: 27 1 2020
medline: 23 10 2020
entrez: 27 1 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

High-quality and relevant nursing education is needed to ensure graduates meet entry to practice competencies. Despite the important role of curricula in the development of nurses and the nursing profession, there does not appear to be a consistent or widely accepted approach to nursing curriculum renewal. To identify and synthesize existing curriculum renewal/redesign practices, create an aggregated logic model depicting an evidence-informed process for nursing curriculum renewal, and stimulate dialogue about how to keep nursing curricula relevant in an ever-changing healthcare context. An integrative review, modeled on the Joanna Briggs Methodology of Systematic Reviews, of the available published articles, including empirical research and discussion articles. We searched for quantitative, qualitative, and non-research literature (English and French) on full nursing programs or curriculum revisions for pre-licensure nursing students enrolled in an undergraduate or associate degree program. Databases included CINAHL, Nursing and Allied Health, and Medline from January 2010 to January 2017. We then did a hand search for articles from January 2017 to April 2019. Extracted data were synthesized into an aggregated logic model based on Yin's method of cross-case analysis. Data included information about the internal context, the external context, drivers, the preparatory phase, the active phase, outcomes, and evaluation methods of the described curriculum renewal process. Twenty articles were included, which were published between 2010 and 2018. The resulting logic model, The Ottawa Model for Nursing Curriculum Renewal, includes information on the context, process and outcomes of the renewal process, and how and when to evaluate curricula. This synthesis aids in defining the process of curriculum renewal for undergraduate nursing education. It stimulates systems level thinking and reveals gaps, such as the need for further research into curriculum evaluation. The Ottawa Model for Nursing Curriculum Renewal is a usable template to aid educators undertaking their own process of curriculum renewal.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
High-quality and relevant nursing education is needed to ensure graduates meet entry to practice competencies. Despite the important role of curricula in the development of nurses and the nursing profession, there does not appear to be a consistent or widely accepted approach to nursing curriculum renewal.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To identify and synthesize existing curriculum renewal/redesign practices, create an aggregated logic model depicting an evidence-informed process for nursing curriculum renewal, and stimulate dialogue about how to keep nursing curricula relevant in an ever-changing healthcare context.
DESIGN METHODS
An integrative review, modeled on the Joanna Briggs Methodology of Systematic Reviews, of the available published articles, including empirical research and discussion articles.
DATA SOURCES METHODS
We searched for quantitative, qualitative, and non-research literature (English and French) on full nursing programs or curriculum revisions for pre-licensure nursing students enrolled in an undergraduate or associate degree program. Databases included CINAHL, Nursing and Allied Health, and Medline from January 2010 to January 2017. We then did a hand search for articles from January 2017 to April 2019.
SYNTHESIS RESULTS
Extracted data were synthesized into an aggregated logic model based on Yin's method of cross-case analysis. Data included information about the internal context, the external context, drivers, the preparatory phase, the active phase, outcomes, and evaluation methods of the described curriculum renewal process.
RESULTS RESULTS
Twenty articles were included, which were published between 2010 and 2018. The resulting logic model, The Ottawa Model for Nursing Curriculum Renewal, includes information on the context, process and outcomes of the renewal process, and how and when to evaluate curricula.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This synthesis aids in defining the process of curriculum renewal for undergraduate nursing education. It stimulates systems level thinking and reveals gaps, such as the need for further research into curriculum evaluation. The Ottawa Model for Nursing Curriculum Renewal is a usable template to aid educators undertaking their own process of curriculum renewal.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31982799
pii: S0260-6917(19)30886-X
doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104344
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

104344

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest None to declare.

Auteurs

Fiona Jager (F)

University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada. Electronic address: fjage083@uottawa.ca.

Amanda Vandyk (A)

University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada. Electronic address: avandyk@uottawa.ca.

Jean Daniel Jacob (JD)

University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada. Electronic address: jeandaniel.jacob@uottawa.ca.

Devyn Meilleur (D)

University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada. Electronic address: dmeil086@uottawa.ca.

Brandi Vanderspank-Wright (B)

University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada. Electronic address: bvanders@uottawa.ca.

Barbara LeBlanc (B)

St Lawrence College, Tri-Campus, 2288 Parkedale Avenue, Brockville, ON K6V 5X3, Canada. Electronic address: bleblanc@sl.on.ca.

Julie Chartrand (J)

University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada. Electronic address: julie.chartrand@uottawa.ca.

Carmen Hust (C)

Algonquin College, Woodroffe Campus, 1385 Woodroffe Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K2G 1V8, Canada. Electronic address: hustc@algonquincollege.com.

Michelle Lalonde (M)

University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada. Electronic address: michelle.lalonde@uottawa.ca.

Angela Rintoul (A)

Algonquin College, Pembroke Campus, 1 College Way, Pembroke, Ontario K8A 0C8, Canada. Electronic address: rintoua@algonquincollege.com.

Diane Alain (D)

University of Ottawa, Gestionnaire par intérim du CIESPI/Acting Manager CIESN, CIESPI- Centre d'innovation en enseignement et en simulation de la pratique infirmière, CIESN Centre for Innovative Education and Simulation in Nursing, C-130, Lees Campus , 200 Lees Ave., Ottawa, ON K1S 5S9, Canada. Electronic address: dalai2@uottawa.ca.

Sherry Poirier (S)

Algonquin College, Woodroffe Campus, 1385 Woodroffe Ave, Ottawa, Ontario K2G 1V8, Canada. Electronic address: poirier@algonquincollege.com.

J Craig Phillips (JC)

University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada. Electronic address: craig.phillips@uottawa.ca.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH