Strabismus in Unicoronal Craniosynostosis: Effect of Orbital Dysmorphology and Fronto-Orbital Advancement and Remodeling.
Journal
Plastic and reconstructive surgery
ISSN: 1529-4242
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1306050
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
entrez:
28
1
2020
pubmed:
28
1
2020
medline:
1
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to determine what craniometric changes occur to both orbits of unicoronal craniosynostosis patients undergoing fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling, and which of these changes are associated with new onset of postoperative strabismus. A retrospective analysis was performed of the preoperative and postoperative orbits of 24 unicoronal craniosynostosis patients and the orbits of 24 control subjects, totaling 144 orbits. Eight parameters were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. One of the parameters was modified orbital index, an indicator of severity of harlequin deformity. Significant differences in orbital dimensions and angles were present bilaterally in unicoronal craniosynostosis orbits when compared to controls. Fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling increased the ipsilateral unicoronal craniosynostosis orbital volume from 13,184 ± 2003 mm to 16,220 ± 2323 mm (p < 0.001). Ipsilateral horizontal cone angles were increased from 48 ± 5 degrees to 54 ± 7 degrees (p = 0.004). Ipsilateral vertical cone angles were decreased from 73 ± 8 degrees to 66 ± 10 degrees (p = 0.003). Ipsilateral modified orbital index improved from 0.83 ± 0.06 to 0.88 ± 0.06 (p = 0.003). Three of the 19 unicoronal craniosynostosis patients developed transient postoperative strabismus. Logistic regression analysis displayed a strong significant association between new-onset strabismus and a change in modified orbital index with a coefficient of 30.84 ± 14.51 (p < 0.05). The orbital dysmorphology in unicoronal craniosynostosis is bilateral in nature, and it is not wholly treated with conventional fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling. The severity of ipsilateral orbital dysmorphology is correlated with the incidence of postoperative strabismus following conventional fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling. Future research is needed to develop strategies to mitigate the risk of development of strabismus in this group of patients. Risk, III.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to determine what craniometric changes occur to both orbits of unicoronal craniosynostosis patients undergoing fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling, and which of these changes are associated with new onset of postoperative strabismus.
METHODS
METHODS
A retrospective analysis was performed of the preoperative and postoperative orbits of 24 unicoronal craniosynostosis patients and the orbits of 24 control subjects, totaling 144 orbits. Eight parameters were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. One of the parameters was modified orbital index, an indicator of severity of harlequin deformity.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Significant differences in orbital dimensions and angles were present bilaterally in unicoronal craniosynostosis orbits when compared to controls. Fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling increased the ipsilateral unicoronal craniosynostosis orbital volume from 13,184 ± 2003 mm to 16,220 ± 2323 mm (p < 0.001). Ipsilateral horizontal cone angles were increased from 48 ± 5 degrees to 54 ± 7 degrees (p = 0.004). Ipsilateral vertical cone angles were decreased from 73 ± 8 degrees to 66 ± 10 degrees (p = 0.003). Ipsilateral modified orbital index improved from 0.83 ± 0.06 to 0.88 ± 0.06 (p = 0.003). Three of the 19 unicoronal craniosynostosis patients developed transient postoperative strabismus. Logistic regression analysis displayed a strong significant association between new-onset strabismus and a change in modified orbital index with a coefficient of 30.84 ± 14.51 (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The orbital dysmorphology in unicoronal craniosynostosis is bilateral in nature, and it is not wholly treated with conventional fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling. The severity of ipsilateral orbital dysmorphology is correlated with the incidence of postoperative strabismus following conventional fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling. Future research is needed to develop strategies to mitigate the risk of development of strabismus in this group of patients.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
METHODS
Risk, III.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31985648
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006479
pii: 00006534-202002000-00043
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
382e-390eRéférences
Beckett JS, Persing JA, Steinbacher DM. Bilateral orbital dysmorphology in unicoronal synostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:125–130.
Lee SJ, Dondey J, Greensmith A, Holmes AD, Meara JG. The effect of fronto-orbital advancement on strabismus in children with unicoronal synostosis. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;61:178–180.
Gencarelli JR, Murphy A, Samargandi OA, Bezuhly M. Ophthalmologic outcomes following fronto-orbital advancement for unicoronal craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27:1629–1635.
Alford J, Derderian CA, Smartt JM Jr.. Surgical treatment of nonsyndromic unicoronal craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29:1199–1207.
Bartlett SP, Whitaker LA, Marchac D. The operative treatment of isolated craniofacial dysostosis (plagiocephaly): A comparison of the unilateral and bilateral techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;85:677–683.
Engel M, Castrillon-Oberndorfer G, Hoffmann J, Mühling J, Seeberger R, Freudlsperger C. Long-term results in nonsyndromatic unilateral coronal synostosis treated with fronto-orbital advancement. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013;41:747–754.
Gerety PA, Taylor JA, Bartlett SP. Rodriguez ED, Losee JE, Neligan PC. Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. In: Plastic Surgery: Craniofacial, Head & Neck Surgery and Pediatric Surgery. 2017:Vol. 3, 4th ed. London: Elsevier; 739–760.e3.
Denis D, Genitori L, Bolufer A, Lena G, Saracco JB, Choux M. Refractive error and ocular motility in plagiocephaly. Childs Nerv Syst. 1994;10:210–216.
Morax S. Oculo-motor disorders in craniofacial malformations. J Maxillofac Surg. 1984;12:1–10.
Samra F, Paliga JT, Tahiri Y, et al. The prevalence of strabismus in unilateral coronal synostosis. Childs Nerv Syst. 2015;31:589–596.
Gosain AK, Steele MA, McCarthy JG, Thorne CH. A prospective study of the relationship between strabismus and head posture in patients with frontal plagiocephaly. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;97:881–891.
Showalter BM, David LR, Argenta LC, Thompson JT. Influence of frontosphenoidal suture synostosis on skull dysmorphology in unicoronal suture synostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:1709–1712.
Regensburg NI, Kok PH, Zonneveld FW, et al. A new and validated CT-based method for the calculation of orbital soft tissue volumes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:1758–1762.
Wolff E. Wolff E. Orbit and paranasal sinuses. In: Anatomy of the Eye and Orbit. 1976:7th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; I–29.
Taylor JA, Paliga JT, Wes AM, et al. A critical evaluation of long-term aesthetic outcomes of fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling in nonsyndromic unicoronal craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:220–231.
MacKinnon S, Proctor MR, Rogers GF, Meara JG, Whitecross S, Dagi LR. Improving ophthalmic outcomes in children with unilateral coronal synostosis by treatment with endoscopic strip craniectomy and helmet therapy rather than fronto-orbital advancement. J AAPOS 2013;17:259–265.
Guyton D, Weingarten P. Sensory torsion as the cause of primary oblique muscle overaction/underaction and A- and V- pattern strabismus. Binocul Vis Eye Muscle Surg Q. 1994;9:209–236.
Robb RM, Boger WP III.. Vertical strabismus associated with plagiocephaly. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1983;20:58–62.
Gobin MH. Sagittalization of the oblique muscles as a possible cause for the “A”, “V”, and “X” phenomena. Br J Ophthalmol. 1968;52:13–18.