Establishing K-levels and prescribing transtibial prostheses using six-minute walk test and one-leg standing test on prosthesis: a retrospective audit.


Journal

International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation
ISSN: 1473-5660
Titre abrégé: Int J Rehabil Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7805421

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 29 1 2020
medline: 13 8 2020
entrez: 29 1 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Rehabilitation programs after amputation often include fitting a prosthesis, but prescriptions vary under similar circumstances. The US Medicare Functional Classification Level (K-level) is a scale for describing functional abilities of persons after lower-limb amputation (from 0 = no ability or potential to ambulate, to 4 = prosthetic demands of a child/active adult/athlete). Different outcome measures are used to assess K-level, including six-minute walk test (6MWT). We attempted to predict the assigned K-level of unilateral transtibial prosthesis users from their results of 6MWT and one-leg standing test on prosthesis (OLSTP). Outpatients who had been rehabilitated and fitted with transtibial prosthesis at the University Rehabilitation Institute in Ljubljana in 2014 were included in a retrospective audit. The data were analysed using receiver-operating-characteristics curves, linear discriminant analysis, classification trees and ordinal logistic regression. Among the 120 patients (aged 39-90, mean 67 years; 79% men), eight belonged to K1 level, 94 to K2, and 18 to K3 or K4; 61 could not stand on the prosthesis, eight stood on it for 1 s, and 51 stood on it for 2 s or more. With a simple classification rule based only on 6MWT (130 m threshold for K2/K3/K4 vs. K1, 340 m for K3/K4 vs. K1/K2), we observed sensitivity and specificity close to 90%. The more sophisticated statistical approaches yielded substantially similar and comparably accurate results. 6MWT and OLST could therefore be used as predictors for transtibial prosthesis prescription in clinical practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31990750
doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000394
pii: 00004356-202009000-00013
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

266-271

Références

Batten HR, McPhail SM, Mandrusiak AM, Varghese PN, Kuys SS. Gait speed as an indicator of prosthetic walking potential following lower limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019; 43:196–203
Borrenpohl D, Kaluf B, Major MJ. Survey of U.S. Practitioners on the validity of the medicare functional classification level system and utility of clinical outcome measures for aiding K-level assignment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016; 97:1053–1063
Curtze C, Hof AL, Postema K, Otten B. Staying in dynamic balance on a prosthetic limb: a leg to stand on? Med Eng Phys. 2016; 38:576–580
De-Rosende Celeiro I, Simón Sanjuán L, Santos-Del-Riego S. Activities of daily living in people with lower limb amputation: outcomes of an intervention to reduce dependence in pre-prosthetic phase. Disabil Rehabil. 2017; 39:1799–1806
Dillon MP, Major MJ, Kaluf B, Balasanov Y, Fatone S. Predict the medicare functional classification level (K-level) using the amputee mobility predictor in people with unilateral transfemoral and transtibial amputation: A pilot study. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018; 42:191–197
Gailey RS, Roach KE, Applegate EB, Cho B, Cunniffe B, Licht S, et al. The amputee mobility predictor: an instrument to assess determinants of the lower-limb amputee’s ability to ambulate. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83:613–627
Health Care Finance Administration; Common Procedure Coding System HCPCS 2001. 2001, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office
Hermodsson Y, Ekdahl C, Persson BM, Roxendal G. Standing balance in trans-tibial amputees following vascular disease or trauma: a comparative study with healthy subjects. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1994; 18:150–158
Klenow TD, Mengelkoch LJ, Stevens PM, Ràbago CA, Hill OT, Latlief GA, et al. The role of exercise testing in predicting successful ambulation with a lower extremity prosthesis: a systematic literature review and clinical practice guideline. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018; 15:64
Lopez MN, Charter RA, Mostafavi B, Nibut LP, Smith WE. Psychometric properties of the folstein mini-mental state examination. Assessment. 2005; 12:137–144
McCullagh P. Regression models for ordinal data. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1980; 42:109–142
O’Connell A. Logistic Regression Models for Ordinal Response Variables. 2006, Thousand Oaks: Sage
O’Keeffe B, Rout S. Prosthetic rehabilitation in the lower limb. Indian J Plast Surg. 2019; 52:134–143
Orendurff MS, Raschke SU, Winder L, Moe D, Boone DA, Kobayashi T. Functional level assessment of individuals with transtibial limb loss: Evaluation in the clinical setting versus objective community ambulatory activity. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2016; 3:205566831663631
Reid L, Thomson P, Besemann M, Dudek N. Going places: does the two-minute walk test predict the six-minute walk test in lower extremity amputees? J Rehabil Med. 2015; 47:256–261
Resnik L, Borgia M. Reliability of outcome measures for people with lower-limb amputations: distinguishing true change from statistical error. Phys Ther. 2011; 91:555–565
Rouhani A, Mohajerzadeh S. An epidemiological and etiological report on lower extremity amputation in northwest of iran. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2013; 1:103–106
Saglam Y, Gulenc B, Birisik F, Ersen A, Yilmaz Yalcinkaya E, Yazicioglu O. The quality of life analysis of knee prosthesis with complete microprocessor control in trans-femoral amputees. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017; 51:466–469
Simmelink EK, Rommers GM, Gardeniers JW, Zijlstra H. Prosthetic fitting in a patient with a transtibial amputation due to a congenital vascular malformation of the right leg. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2014; 38:167–170
Sions JM, Beisheim EH, Manal TJ, Smith SC, Horne JR, Sarlo FB. Differences in physical performance measures among patients with unilateral lower-limb amputations classified as functional level K3 versus K4. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018; 99:1333–1341
Stern JR, Wong CK, Yerovinkina M, Spindler SJ, See AS, Panjaki S, et al. A meta-analysis of long-term mortality and associated risk factors following lower extremity amputation. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017; 42:322–327
Stevens P, Fross N, Kapp S. Clinically relevant outcome measures in orthotics and prosthetics. Acad Today. 2009; 5:A4–A11
Sturk JA, Lemaire ED, Sinitski E, Dudek NL, Besemann M, Hebert JS, Baddour N. Gait differences between K3 and K4 persons with transfemoral amputation across level and non-level walking conditions. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018; 42:626–635
Wright & Filippis; Gait deviations and prosthetic knee and feet systems. 2007. https://slideplayer.com/slide/4188480/. [Accessed 10 December 2019]

Auteurs

Neža Majdič (N)

University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana.

Gaj Vidmar (G)

University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana.
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Primorska.

Helena Burger (H)

University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH