Safety of Human Adipose Stromal Vascular Fraction Cells Isolated with a Closed System Device in an Immunocompetent Murine Pressure Ulcer Model.
Adipose Tissue
/ cytology
Adolescent
Animals
Cell Differentiation
/ physiology
Disease Models, Animal
Extracellular Matrix
/ physiology
Female
Fibroblasts
/ cytology
Humans
Male
Mice
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Pressure Ulcer
/ pathology
Reperfusion Injury
/ pathology
Skin
/ pathology
Stem Cells
/ cytology
Stromal Cells
/ cytology
adipose
pressure ulcer
stromal vascular fraction cell
Journal
Stem cells and development
ISSN: 1557-8534
Titre abrégé: Stem Cells Dev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101197107
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 04 2020
01 04 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
30
1
2020
medline:
21
5
2021
entrez:
30
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pressure ulcers (PUs) result in part due to ischemia-reperfusion injury to the skin and present frequently in elderly or quadriplegic patients with reduced mobility. Despite the high economic and societal cost of this condition, PU therapy relies primarily on preventive strategies and invasive surgical intervention. A growing body of clinical literature suggests that localized injection of adipose-derived cells can accelerate and enhance the closure of PUs. The current study systematically evaluated the safety of human adipose stromal vascular fraction (SVF) cells isolated using a closed system device when injected into a murine PU injury model. The human SVF cells were characterized by colony-forming unit-fibroblast and differentiation assays before use. Young (2 months) immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice subjected to a magnet-induced ischemia-reperfusion injury were injected subcutaneously with human SVF cells at increasing doses (0.25-2 million cells). The size of the PU was monitored over a 20-day period. Both female and male mice tolerated the concentration-dependent injection of the SVF cells without complications. While male mice trended toward more rapid wound closure rates in response to lower SVF cell concentrations (0.25-0.5 million cells), female mice responded favorably to higher SVF cell concentrations (1-2 million cells); however, outcomes did not reach statistical significance in either sex. Overall, the study demonstrates that human SVF cells prepared with a closed system device designed for use at point of care can be safely administered for PU therapy in an immunocompetent host animal model.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31992147
doi: 10.1089/scd.2019.0245
pmc: PMC7153633
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
452-461Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Références
Cytotherapy. 2014 Feb;16(2):245-57
pubmed: 24438903
Cytotherapy. 2010 Jul;12(4):538-46
pubmed: 20380539
Microvasc Res. 2013 Nov;90:138-43
pubmed: 24120748
J Transl Med. 2017 Jun 19;15(1):143
pubmed: 28629476
Dermatology. 2011;223(3):266-84
pubmed: 22116308
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jul;128(1):305-10
pubmed: 21701348
Stem Cells Dev. 2020 Apr 1;29(7):440-451
pubmed: 31950878
Wound Repair Regen. 2017 Apr;25(2):248-259
pubmed: 28371152
Stem Cells Dev. 2010 Jan;19(1):83-92
pubmed: 19400629
Methods Mol Biol. 2011;702:87-105
pubmed: 21082397
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Mar 3;162(5):359-69
pubmed: 25732278
Int Wound J. 2019 Jun;16(3):634-640
pubmed: 30693644
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Mar 3;162(5):370-9
pubmed: 25732279
Cytotherapy. 2013 Jun;15(6):641-8
pubmed: 23570660
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Apr 07;3(3):e334
pubmed: 25878945
Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1773:155-165
pubmed: 29687388
Acta Biomater. 2009 Jul;5(6):1926-36
pubmed: 19342320
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003 Sep-Oct;40(5):433-41
pubmed: 15080228
Stem Cells Int. 2019 Feb 11;2019:2340725
pubmed: 30886634
Wound Repair Regen. 2000 Jan-Feb;8(1):68-76
pubmed: 10760216
Circ J. 2012;76(7):1750-60
pubmed: 22498564
Stem Cells Dev. 2018 Oct 18;:
pubmed: 30187827
FASEB J. 2017 Jan;31(1):29-34
pubmed: 27682203
Stem Cell Res. 2017 Jan;18:14-21
pubmed: 27984756
Clin Plast Surg. 2017 Oct;44(4):781-791
pubmed: 28888303
J Invest Surg. 2004 Jul-Aug;17(4):221-7
pubmed: 15371164
Wound Repair Regen. 2009 Jul-Aug;17(4):480-4
pubmed: 19614912
Stem Cells Int. 2018 Dec 30;2018:4789568
pubmed: 30693037
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Nov 21;6(11):e2010
pubmed: 30881803
Stem Cells Dev. 2019 Nov 1;28(21):1463-1472
pubmed: 31530229
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 7;7(1):17186
pubmed: 29215059
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jan;137(1):302-12
pubmed: 26710034
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019 Jul 29;10(1):223
pubmed: 31358046
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2002 Mar-Apr;15(2):72-7
pubmed: 11984050
Clin Geriatr Med. 2011 May;27(2):241-58
pubmed: 21641509
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2015 Jun;4(6):632-42
pubmed: 25900728
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2004 Oct;50(10):22-4, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36-8
pubmed: 15509880