Gene expression identifies metabolic and functional differences between intramuscular and subcutaneous adipocytes in cattle.
Adipocytes
/ metabolism
Adipogenesis
/ genetics
Animals
Cattle
Cluster Analysis
Computational Biology
/ methods
Energy Metabolism
Gene Expression
Gene Expression Profiling
/ methods
Metabolome
Metabolomics
/ methods
Muscle, Skeletal
/ cytology
Organ Specificity
/ genetics
Subcutaneous Fat
/ cytology
Transcriptome
Bovine fat depots
Intermuscular
Kidney
Omental
Journal
BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Jan 2020
28 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
14
08
2019
accepted:
17
01
2020
entrez:
30
1
2020
pubmed:
30
1
2020
medline:
29
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study used a genome-wide screen of gene expression to better understand the metabolic and functional differences between commercially valuable intramuscular fat (IMF) and commercially wasteful subcutaneous (SC) fat depots in Bos taurus beef cattle. We confirmed many findings previously made at the biochemical level and made new discoveries. The fundamental lipogenic machinery, such as ACACA and FASN encoding the rate limiting Acetyl CoA carboxylase and Fatty Acid synthase were expressed at 1.6-1.8 fold lower levels in IMF, consistent with previous findings. The FA elongation pathway including the rate limiting ELOVL6 was also coordinately downregulated in IMF compared to SC as expected. A 2-fold lower expression in IMF of ACSS2 encoding Acetyl Coenzyme A synthetase is consistent with utilisation of less acetate for lipogenesis in IMF compared to SC as previously determined using radioisotope incorporation. Reduced saturation of fat in the SC depot is reflected by 2.4 fold higher expression of the SCD gene encoding the Δ9 desaturase enzyme. Surprisingly, CH25H encoding the cholesterol 25 hydroxylase enzyme was ~ 36 fold upregulated in IMF compared to SC. Moreover, its expression in whole muscle tissue appears representative of the proportional representation of bovine marbling adipocytes. This suite of observations prompted quantification of a set of oxysterols (oxidised forms of cholesterol) in the plasma of 8 cattle exhibiting varying IMF. Using Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) we found the levels of several oxysterols were significantly associated with multiple marbling measurements across the musculature, but (with just one exception) no other carcass phenotypes. These data build on our molecular understanding of ruminant fat depot biology and suggest oxysterols represent a promising circulating biomarker for cattle marbling.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This study used a genome-wide screen of gene expression to better understand the metabolic and functional differences between commercially valuable intramuscular fat (IMF) and commercially wasteful subcutaneous (SC) fat depots in Bos taurus beef cattle.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We confirmed many findings previously made at the biochemical level and made new discoveries. The fundamental lipogenic machinery, such as ACACA and FASN encoding the rate limiting Acetyl CoA carboxylase and Fatty Acid synthase were expressed at 1.6-1.8 fold lower levels in IMF, consistent with previous findings. The FA elongation pathway including the rate limiting ELOVL6 was also coordinately downregulated in IMF compared to SC as expected. A 2-fold lower expression in IMF of ACSS2 encoding Acetyl Coenzyme A synthetase is consistent with utilisation of less acetate for lipogenesis in IMF compared to SC as previously determined using radioisotope incorporation. Reduced saturation of fat in the SC depot is reflected by 2.4 fold higher expression of the SCD gene encoding the Δ9 desaturase enzyme. Surprisingly, CH25H encoding the cholesterol 25 hydroxylase enzyme was ~ 36 fold upregulated in IMF compared to SC. Moreover, its expression in whole muscle tissue appears representative of the proportional representation of bovine marbling adipocytes. This suite of observations prompted quantification of a set of oxysterols (oxidised forms of cholesterol) in the plasma of 8 cattle exhibiting varying IMF. Using Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) we found the levels of several oxysterols were significantly associated with multiple marbling measurements across the musculature, but (with just one exception) no other carcass phenotypes.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
These data build on our molecular understanding of ruminant fat depot biology and suggest oxysterols represent a promising circulating biomarker for cattle marbling.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31992204
doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6505-4
pii: 10.1186/s12864-020-6505-4
pmc: PMC6986065
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
77Références
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 Jun;1791(6):501-6
pubmed: 19038363
Bioinformatics. 2005 Apr 1;21(7):1280-1
pubmed: 15546938
Biochem J. 1995 Aug 1;309 ( Pt 3):697-710
pubmed: 7639681
Genet Mol Res. 2015 Aug 14;14(3):9370-83
pubmed: 26345871
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Jan;292(1):E298-307
pubmed: 16985259
Bioinformatics. 2005 Apr 1;21(7):1112-20
pubmed: 15564293
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53181
pubmed: 23301040
Prog Lipid Res. 2008 Nov;47(6):391-404
pubmed: 18502209
BMC Syst Biol. 2017 Feb 24;11(1):29
pubmed: 28235404
Nat Rev Immunol. 2014 Nov;14(11):731-43
pubmed: 25324126
J Anim Sci. 1995 May;73(5):1310-7
pubmed: 7665362
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Feb 03;10:48
pubmed: 19192299
J Nutr. 1984 Apr;114(4):792-800
pubmed: 6716183
Animal. 2010 Feb;4(2):303-19
pubmed: 22443885
J Anim Sci. 2009 Apr;87(4):1218-46
pubmed: 18849378
PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Mar 23;3(3):e39
pubmed: 17381235
J Anim Sci. 2015 Aug;93(8):4132-43
pubmed: 26440193
J Anim Sci. 2013 Jun;91(6):2938-46
pubmed: 23508025
J Biol Chem. 2007 Oct 26;282(43):31525-33
pubmed: 17785466
J Anim Sci. 2009 Apr;87(14 Suppl):E72-82
pubmed: 18997081
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Jun 09;9:271
pubmed: 18541026
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1043:65-86
pubmed: 29224091
Exp Cell Res. 2013 May 1;319(8):1176-86
pubmed: 23485764
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2018 Jul;31(7):1043-1061
pubmed: 29879830
FASEB J. 2013 Jan;27(1):277-87
pubmed: 23047894
Fed Proc. 1976 Sep;35(11):2308-13
pubmed: 182555
PLoS One. 2009 Oct 01;4(10):e7249
pubmed: 19794913
J Biol Chem. 1974 Oct 10;249(19):6057-61
pubmed: 4472550
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Aug;291(2):E372-80
pubmed: 16705057
Redox Biol. 2017 Aug;12:456-461
pubmed: 28319895
PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 May;5(5):e1000382
pubmed: 19412532
J Lipid Res. 2017 Jan;58(1):267-278
pubmed: 27811233