Cost-effectiveness of a cardiac contractility modulation device in heart failure with normal QRS duration.
Aged
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Electric Stimulation Therapy
/ adverse effects
Electrocardiography
Female
Heart
/ physiopathology
Heart Failure
/ economics
Hospitalization
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pacemaker, Artificial
/ adverse effects
Quality of Life
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Cardiac contractility modulation
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Heart failure
Journal
ESC heart failure
ISSN: 2055-5822
Titre abrégé: ESC Heart Fail
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101669191
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2019
12 2019
Historique:
received:
14
03
2019
revised:
28
06
2019
accepted:
04
09
2019
entrez:
31
1
2020
pubmed:
31
1
2020
medline:
14
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective of this paper is to assess whether cardiac contractility modulation (via the Optimizer System) plus standard of care (SoC) is a cost-effective treatment for people with heart failure [New York Heart Association (NYHA) III, left ventricular ejection fraction of 25-45%, and narrow QRS] compared against SoC alone from the perspective of the English National Health Service. We developed a regression equation-based cost-effectiveness model, using individual patient data from three randomized control trials (FIX-HF-5 Phases 1 and 2, and FIX-HF-5C) to populate the majority of parameters. A series of regression equations predicted NYHA class over time, mortality, all-cause hospitalization rates, and health-related quality of life. We conducted the analysis in line with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence reference case, modelling costs from an English National Health Service perspective, and considering outcomes in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over a patient lifetime perspective. Our base case analysis produced an incremental cost per additional QALY of GBP22 988 (€25 750) when comparing Optimizer + SoC to SoC alone. This result was not sensitive to parameter uncertainty but was sensitive to the time horizon over which costs and QALYs were captured and the duration over which a survival benefit with Optimizer + SoC can be assumed to apply. Cardiac contractility modulation is likely to be cost-effective in people with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, NYHA III, and narrow QRS, provided that the treatment benefit can be maintained beyond the duration of the existing clinical trial follow-up. This analysis supports the current recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology that this therapy may be considered for such patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31997539
doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12526
pmc: PMC6989288
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1178-1187Subventions
Organisme : Impulse Dynamics
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Références
Europace. 2010 Nov;12(11):1564-70
pubmed: 20974768
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Dec 20;46(12):2229-36
pubmed: 16360051
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 May 06;5(5):
pubmed: 27153871
Heart Rhythm. 2006 Oct;3(10):1140-7
pubmed: 17018340
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 8;70(6):776-803
pubmed: 28461007
Eur Heart J. 2005 Dec;26(24):2681-8
pubmed: 16284203
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Feb 15;277:173-177
pubmed: 30409733
Eur Heart J. 2013 Feb;34(7):529-39
pubmed: 23041499
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Dec;19(12):1574-1585
pubmed: 28386917
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Sep-Oct;32(5):417-422
pubmed: 29211223
Am Heart J. 2011 Feb;161(2):329-337.e1-2
pubmed: 21315216
Eur Heart J. 2008 Apr;29(8):1019-28
pubmed: 18270213
Heart Fail Clin. 2017 Jan;13(1):117-137
pubmed: 27886918
J Card Fail. 2011 Sep;17(9):710-7
pubmed: 21872139
Med Decis Making. 2013 Aug;33(6):743-54
pubmed: 23341049
Heart. 2014 Jul;100(13):1031-6
pubmed: 24634022
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Dec;2(12):1341-9
pubmed: 20083066
Heart. 2016 Nov 1;102(21):1742-1749
pubmed: 27411837
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Sep;21(9):1103-1113
pubmed: 30652394
Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Aug;18(8):891-975
pubmed: 27207191
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Mar 15;183:76-81
pubmed: 25662055
JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Oct;6(10):874-883
pubmed: 29754812