Tricuspid Annular Plane of Systolic Excursion (TAPSE) for the Evaluation of Patients with Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.
Journal
The western journal of emergency medicine
ISSN: 1936-9018
Titre abrégé: West J Emerg Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101476450
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Jan 2020
13 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
25
08
2019
accepted:
10
11
2019
pubmed:
31
1
2020
medline:
24
3
2020
entrez:
31
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Sepsis is a systemic infection that can rapidly progress into multi organ failure and shock if left untreated. Previous studies have demonstrated the utility of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in the evaluation of patients with sepsis. However, limited data exists on the evaluation of the tricuspid annular plane of systolic excursion (TAPSE) in patients with sepsis. We prospectively enrolled patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with concern for severe sepsis or septic shock in a pilot study. In patients that screened positive, the treating physician then performed POCUS to measure the TAPSE value. We compared the intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate, hospital length of stay, and morbidity with their respective TAPSE values. We enrolled 24 patients in the study. Eight patients had TAPSE values less than 16 millimeters (mm), two patients had TAPSE values between 16mm-20mm, and fourteen patients had TAPSE values greater than 20mm. There was no statistically significant association between TAPSE levels and ICU admission (p=0.16), or death (p=0.14). The difference of length of stay (LOS) was not statistically significant in case of hospital LOS (p= 0.72) or ICU LOS. Our pilot data did not demonstrate a correlation between severe sepsis or septic shock and TAPSE values. This may be due to several factors including patient comorbidities, strict definitions of sepsis and septic shock, as well as the absence of septic cardiomyopathy (SCM) in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Future large-scale studies are needed to determine if TAPSE can be beneficial in the ED evaluation of patients with concern for SCM.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31999246
pii: westjem.2019.11.44968
doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.11.44968
pmc: PMC7081860
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
348-352Références
BMJ. 2007 Oct 27;335(7625):879-83
pubmed: 17962288
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10
pubmed: 26903338
Exp Clin Cardiol. 2006 Fall;11(3):226-36
pubmed: 18651035
Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Sep 7;7(1):94
pubmed: 28884343
Heart. 2002 Sep;88(3):244-8
pubmed: 12181215
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;12(3):371-378
pubmed: 27236328
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2019 Jan;7(1):67-71
pubmed: 30719469
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;35(1):106-111
pubmed: 27793505
Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637
pubmed: 23353941
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):625-634
pubmed: 29227368
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377
pubmed: 28101605
Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Jul;87(7):620-8
pubmed: 22683055
Ann Intensive Care. 2011 Apr 13;1(1):6
pubmed: 21906334
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015;17(4):21
pubmed: 25725606
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 May 29;18(1):242
pubmed: 29843641
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Jun 30;2:16045
pubmed: 28117397
J Intensive Care Soc. 2015 Feb;16(1):52-57
pubmed: 28979375
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2011 Aug;7(3):163-83
pubmed: 22758615
J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Mar;38(3):695-702
pubmed: 30182486
J Intensive Care. 2015 Nov 11;3:48
pubmed: 26566443