Portion size estimation in dietary assessment: a systematic review of existing tools, their strengths and limitations.

comparison dietary assessment portion size estimation aids portion size tools validation

Journal

Nutrition reviews
ISSN: 1753-4887
Titre abrégé: Nutr Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376405

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 11 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 31 1 2020
medline: 20 4 2021
entrez: 31 1 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Overestimation or underestimation of portion size leads to measurement error during dietary assessment. To identify portion size estimation elements (PSEEs) and evaluate their relative efficacy in relation to dietary assessment, and assess the quality of studies validating PSEEs. Electronic databases, internet sites, and cross-references of published records were searched, generating 16 801 initial records, from which 334 records were reviewed and 542 PSEEs were identified, comprising 5% 1-dimensional tools (eg, food guides), 46% 2-dimensional tools (eg, photographic atlases), and 49% 3-dimensional tools (eg, household utensils). Out of 334 studies, 21 validated a PSEE (compared PSEE to actual food amounts) and 13 compared PSEEs with other PSEEs. Quality assessment showed that only a few validation studies were of high quality. According to the findings of validation and comparison studies, food image-based PSEEs were more accurate than food models and household utensils. Key factors to consider when selecting a PSEE include efficiency of the PSEE and its applicability to targeted settings and populations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31999347
pii: 5718006
doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuz107
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

885-900

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_U105960384
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : U105960384
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Life Sciences Institute. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Birdem Amoutzopoulos (B)

MRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge, UK.
NIHR BRC Diet, Anthropometry and Physical Activity Group, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Polly Page (P)

MRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge, UK.
NIHR BRC Diet, Anthropometry and Physical Activity Group, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Caireen Roberts (C)

MRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge, UK.
NIHR BRC Diet, Anthropometry and Physical Activity Group, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Mark Roe (M)

EuroFIR AISBL, Brussels, Belgium.

Janet Cade (J)

Nutritional Epidemiology Group, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Toni Steer (T)

MRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge, UK.
NIHR BRC Diet, Anthropometry and Physical Activity Group, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Ruby Baker (R)

MRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge, UK.

Tabitha Hawes (T)

MRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge, UK.

Catherine Galloway (C)

MRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge, UK.

Dove Yu (D)

MRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge, UK.

Eva Almiron-Roig (E)

Centre for Nutrition Research, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH