Portion size estimation in dietary assessment: a systematic review of existing tools, their strengths and limitations.
comparison
dietary assessment
portion size estimation aids
portion size tools
validation
Journal
Nutrition reviews
ISSN: 1753-4887
Titre abrégé: Nutr Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376405
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2020
01 11 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
31
1
2020
medline:
20
4
2021
entrez:
31
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Overestimation or underestimation of portion size leads to measurement error during dietary assessment. To identify portion size estimation elements (PSEEs) and evaluate their relative efficacy in relation to dietary assessment, and assess the quality of studies validating PSEEs. Electronic databases, internet sites, and cross-references of published records were searched, generating 16 801 initial records, from which 334 records were reviewed and 542 PSEEs were identified, comprising 5% 1-dimensional tools (eg, food guides), 46% 2-dimensional tools (eg, photographic atlases), and 49% 3-dimensional tools (eg, household utensils). Out of 334 studies, 21 validated a PSEE (compared PSEE to actual food amounts) and 13 compared PSEEs with other PSEEs. Quality assessment showed that only a few validation studies were of high quality. According to the findings of validation and comparison studies, food image-based PSEEs were more accurate than food models and household utensils. Key factors to consider when selecting a PSEE include efficiency of the PSEE and its applicability to targeted settings and populations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31999347
pii: 5718006
doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuz107
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
885-900Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_U105960384
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : U105960384
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Life Sciences Institute. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.