Prognostic value of 18F-FET PET/CT in newly diagnosed WHO 2016 high-grade glioma.


Journal

Medicine
ISSN: 1536-5964
Titre abrégé: Medicine (Baltimore)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985248R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Historique:
entrez: 1 2 2020
pubmed: 1 2 2020
medline: 12 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

O-(2-[F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (F-FET PET/CT) is well known in brain tumor management. Our study aimed to identify the prognostic value of F-FET PET/CT in high-grade gliomas (HGG) according the current 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification.Patients with histologically proven WHO 2016 HGG were prospectively included. A dynamic F-FET PET/CT was performed allowing to obtain 2 static PET frames (static frame 1: 20-40 minutes and static frame 2: 2-22 minutes). We analyzed static parameters (standard uptake value [SUV]max, SUVmean, SUVpeak, TBRmax, TBRmean, tumoral lesion glycolysis, and metabolic tumoral volume) for various isocontours (from 10% to 90%). PET parameters, clinical features, and molecular biomarkers were compared with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in univariate and multivariate analysis.Twenty-nine patients were included (grade III n = 3, grade IV n = 26). Mean PFS and OS were, respectively, 8.8 and 13.9 months. According to univariate analysis, SUVmean, SUVpeak, TBRmax, and TBRmean were significantly correlated with OS. In static 1 analysis, TBRmax seemed to be the best OS prognostic parameter (P = .004). In static 2 analysis, TBRmean was the best parameter (P = .01). In static 1 analysis, only SUVpeak was significant (P = .05) for PFS. Good performance status (PS < 2; P < .0001) and extent of resection (P = .019) identified the subgroup of patients with the best OS. Only TBRmax (P = .026) and extent of resection (P = .025) remained significant parameters in multivariate analysis.Our data suggested that high TBRmax seemed to be the most significant OS independent prognostic factor in patients with newly diagnosed HGG.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32000446
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019017
pii: 00005792-202001310-00093
pmc: PMC7004648
doi:

Substances chimiques

Contrast Media 0
Radiopharmaceuticals 0
(18F)fluoroethyltyrosine 1326R5J1IA
Tyrosine 42HK56048U

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e19017

Références

J Neurooncol. 2016 Aug;129(1):147-54
pubmed: 27270908
J Nucl Med. 2013 Feb;54(2):229-35
pubmed: 23232275
J Nucl Med. 2001 Mar;42(3):432-45
pubmed: 11337520
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989 Jun;16(6):1405-9
pubmed: 2542195
EJNMMI Res. 2017 Dec;7(1):48
pubmed: 28560582
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 Nov-Dec;26(10):2466-74
pubmed: 16286386
Lancet Oncol. 2009 May;10(5):459-66
pubmed: 19269895
Neuro Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;20(suppl_4):iv1-iv86
pubmed: 30445539
Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2015 Oct;41(6):694-720
pubmed: 25944653
Eur J Radiol. 2015 May;84(5):955-62
pubmed: 25748815
J Neurosurg. 2005 Feb;102(2):318-27
pubmed: 15739561
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Jan;40(1):22-33
pubmed: 23053325
Brain. 2005 Mar;128(Pt 3):678-87
pubmed: 15689365
J Nucl Med. 2011 Jun;52(6):856-64
pubmed: 21622893
Neurology. 2015 Feb 17;84(7):710-9
pubmed: 25609769
J Nucl Med. 2007 Sep;48(9):1468-81
pubmed: 17704239
J Neurosurg. 2010 Aug;113(2):286-92
pubmed: 20302391
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Feb 1;19(2):281-288
pubmed: 27471107
J Nucl Med. 2006 Mar;47(3):393-403
pubmed: 16513607
Eur Radiol. 2015 Oct;25(10):3017-24
pubmed: 25813014
J Neurooncol. 2018 Sep;139(3):721-730
pubmed: 29948765
J Nucl Med. 2015 Jan;56(1):9-15
pubmed: 25537990
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Mar;46(3):540-557
pubmed: 30519867
Nucl Med Biol. 2009 Oct;36(7):779-87
pubmed: 19720290
Mol Imaging Biol. 2019 Dec;21(6):1174-1181
pubmed: 30977078
Neuro Oncol. 2016 Mar;18(3):426-34
pubmed: 26243791
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Aug;15(9):e395-403
pubmed: 25079102
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Jun;43(6):1105-14
pubmed: 26666239
Neuro Oncol. 2011 Aug;13(8):806-19
pubmed: 21757446
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):803-20
pubmed: 27157931
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96
pubmed: 15758009
Eur Radiol. 2010 Oct;20(10):2496-502
pubmed: 20521054

Auteurs

Gurvan Dissaux (G)

Radiotherapy Department.

Victor Basse (V)

Oncology Department, University Hospital Morvan, Brest Cedex.

Ulrike Schick (U)

Radiotherapy Department.

Osman El Kabbaj (O)

Saint-yves Oncology Center, Vannes.

Benjamin Auberger (B)

Oncology Department, University Hospital Morvan, Brest Cedex.

Elsa Magro (E)

Neurosurgery Department University Hospital Cavale Blanche.

Aboubakr Kassoul (A)

Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospitam Morvan, Brest cedex.

Ronan Abgral (R)

Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospitam Morvan, Brest cedex.
EA 3878 GETBO IFR 148.
University of Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.

Pierre-Yves Salaun (PY)

Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospitam Morvan, Brest cedex.
EA 3878 GETBO IFR 148.
University of Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.

David Bourhis (D)

Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospitam Morvan, Brest cedex.
EA 3878 GETBO IFR 148.
University of Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.

Solène Querellou (S)

Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospitam Morvan, Brest cedex.
EA 3878 GETBO IFR 148.
University of Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH