Comparative analysis of Lactobacillus gasseri from Chinese subjects reveals a new species-level taxa.
Adult
Asian People
Bacterial Proteins
/ genetics
Bacteriocins
/ genetics
CRISPR-Cas Systems
/ genetics
DNA, Bacterial
/ genetics
Feces
/ microbiology
Genome, Bacterial
/ genetics
Genomics
/ methods
Humans
Infant
Lactobacillus gasseri
/ genetics
Phylogeny
Probiotics
/ metabolism
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
/ genetics
ANI
Genotype
Lactobacillus gasseri
Lactobacillus paragasseri
Pan/core-genome
Journal
BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Feb 2020
03 Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
12
02
2019
accepted:
22
01
2020
entrez:
5
2
2020
pubmed:
6
2
2020
medline:
2
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lactobacillus gasseri as a probiotic has history of safe consumption is prevalent in infants and adults gut microbiota to maintain gut homeostasis. In this study, to explore the genomic diversity and mine potential probiotic characteristics of L. gasseri, 92 strains of L. gasseri were isolated from Chinese human feces and identified based on 16 s rDNA sequencing, after draft genomes sequencing, further average nucleotide identity (ANI) value and phylogenetic analysis reclassified them as L. paragasseri (n = 79) and L. gasseri (n = 13), respectively. Their pan/core-genomes were determined, revealing that L. paragasseri had an open pan-genome. Comparative analysis was carried out to identify genetic features, and the results indicated that 39 strains of L. paragasseri harboured Type II-A CRISPR-Cas system while 12 strains of L. gasseri contained Type I-E and II-A CRISPR-Cas systems. Bacteriocin operons and the number of carbohydrate-active enzymes were significantly different between the two species. This is the first time to study pan/core-genome of L. gasseri and L. paragasseri, and compare their genetic diversity, and all the results provided better understating on genetics of the two species.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Lactobacillus gasseri as a probiotic has history of safe consumption is prevalent in infants and adults gut microbiota to maintain gut homeostasis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In this study, to explore the genomic diversity and mine potential probiotic characteristics of L. gasseri, 92 strains of L. gasseri were isolated from Chinese human feces and identified based on 16 s rDNA sequencing, after draft genomes sequencing, further average nucleotide identity (ANI) value and phylogenetic analysis reclassified them as L. paragasseri (n = 79) and L. gasseri (n = 13), respectively. Their pan/core-genomes were determined, revealing that L. paragasseri had an open pan-genome. Comparative analysis was carried out to identify genetic features, and the results indicated that 39 strains of L. paragasseri harboured Type II-A CRISPR-Cas system while 12 strains of L. gasseri contained Type I-E and II-A CRISPR-Cas systems. Bacteriocin operons and the number of carbohydrate-active enzymes were significantly different between the two species.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This is the first time to study pan/core-genome of L. gasseri and L. paragasseri, and compare their genetic diversity, and all the results provided better understating on genetics of the two species.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32013858
doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6527-y
pii: 10.1186/s12864-020-6527-y
pmc: PMC6998098
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bacterial Proteins
0
Bacteriocins
0
DNA, Bacterial
0
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
119Subventions
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : Nos. 31530056, 31820103010, 31801521
Organisme : Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
ID : JUSRP11733
Organisme : National Firs-Class Discipline Program of Food Science and Technology
ID : JUFSTR20180102
Références
Gigascience. 2012 Dec 27;1(1):18
pubmed: 23587118
J Appl Microbiol. 2000 Sep;89(3):511-6
pubmed: 11021584
Anaerobe. 2010 Jun;16(3):293-300
pubmed: 19695336
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jul;41(Web Server issue):W448-53
pubmed: 23677608
Curr Drug Discov Technol. 2009 Mar;6(1):1-18
pubmed: 19275538
FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2006 Oct;48(1):56-63
pubmed: 16965352
Microbiology. 2015 Sep;161(9):1752-1761
pubmed: 26297561
BMC Genomics. 2018 Apr 24;19(1):284
pubmed: 29690879
BMC Genomics. 2014 Mar 01;15:170
pubmed: 24581150
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013 Nov;37(6):915-35
pubmed: 23488471
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 19;8(7):e68731
pubmed: 23894338
BMC Genomics. 2015 Dec 01;16:1023
pubmed: 26626322
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1994 Jul;58(7):1218-21
pubmed: 7765246
J Bacteriol. 2007 Feb;189(4):1311-21
pubmed: 17142402
Genome Announc. 2014 Dec 04;2(6):null
pubmed: 25477398
Bioinformatics. 2012 Feb 1;28(3):416-8
pubmed: 22130594
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018 Nov;68(11):3512-3517
pubmed: 30226464
Gut. 2013 Jun;62(6):920-32
pubmed: 22550129
Front Microbiol. 2017 Sep 26;8:1851
pubmed: 29033911
Genome Announc. 2014 Jul 24;2(4):null
pubmed: 25059871
Bioinformatics. 2007 Mar 15;23(6):673-9
pubmed: 17237039
PLoS Genet. 2013;9(8):e1003683
pubmed: 23966868
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 Aug;18(8):986-91
pubmed: 12859730
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2000 Oct;64(10):2201-8
pubmed: 11129595
Microb Genom. 2017 Jun 13;3(8):e000115
pubmed: 29026656
Trends Genet. 2000 Jun;16(6):276-7
pubmed: 10827456
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 1;8(1):11544
pubmed: 30068963
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2017 May 20;63(5):19-24
pubmed: 28719340
Mikrobiologiia. 2011 Sep-Oct;80(5):659-68
pubmed: 22168010
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jul 2;46(W1):W246-W251
pubmed: 29790974
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Dec;30(12):2725-9
pubmed: 24132122
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 01;6:23971
pubmed: 27035119
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007 Jan;57(Pt 1):81-91
pubmed: 17220447
BMC Genomics. 2017 Mar 29;18(1):267
pubmed: 28356072
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 14;7(1):3481
pubmed: 28615683
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015 Nov;13(11):722-36
pubmed: 26411297
Brief Bioinform. 2019 Jul 19;20(4):1160-1166
pubmed: 28968734
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 10;106(45):19126-31
pubmed: 19855009
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jul 8;44(W1):W54-7
pubmed: 27174935
Genome Biol Evol. 2016 Jul 02;8(6):1889-905
pubmed: 27358423
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014 Feb;64(Pt 2):346-51
pubmed: 24505072
Nat Commun. 2015 Sep 29;6:8322
pubmed: 26415554
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018 Sep;68(9):2707-2709
pubmed: 30209001
Biosci Microbiota Food Health. 2017;36(4):155-159
pubmed: 29038772
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Dec 15;10:421
pubmed: 20003500
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 17;103(42):15611-6
pubmed: 17030793
BMC Genomics. 2012 Oct 05;13:533
pubmed: 23035691
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001 Nov 27;205(1):31-6
pubmed: 11728712
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 Jul;61(1):110-20
pubmed: 17506826
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Feb 15;102(7):2567-72
pubmed: 15701695