Do penguins' vocal sequences conform to linguistic laws?
acoustic sequences
bioacoustics
compression
information theory
seabirds
Journal
Biology letters
ISSN: 1744-957X
Titre abrégé: Biol Lett
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101247722
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
entrez:
6
2
2020
pubmed:
6
2
2020
medline:
28
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Information compression is a general principle of human language: the most frequent words are shorter in length (Zipf's Law of Brevity) and the duration of constituents decreases as the size of the linguistic construct increases (Menzerath-Altmann Law). Vocal sequences of non-human primates have been shown to conform to both these laws, suggesting information compression might be a more general principle. Here, we investigated whether display songs of the African penguin, which mediate recognition, intersexual mate choice and territorial defence, conform with these laws. Display songs are long, loud sequences combining three types of syllables. We found that the shortest type of syllable was the most frequent (with the shortest syllable being repeated stereotypically, potentially favouring signal redundancy in crowded environments). We also found that the average duration of the song's constituents was negatively correlated with the size of the song (a consequence of increasing the relative number of the shortest syllable type, rather than reducing the duration across all syllable types, thus preserving the communication of size-related information in the duration of the longest syllable type). Our results provide the first evidence for conformity to Zipf's and Menzerath-Altmann Laws in the vocal sequences of a non-primate species, indicating that these laws can coexist with selection pressures specific to the species' ecology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32019463
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0589
pmc: PMC7058940
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4829178']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20190589Références
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 08;7:43862
pubmed: 28272418
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 30;9(7):e103460
pubmed: 25076136
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2016 Feb;91(1):13-52
pubmed: 25428267
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 25;5:17255
pubmed: 26602001
Cogn Sci. 2013 Nov-Dec;37(8):1565-78
pubmed: 23895349
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jan 7;273(1582):11-7
pubmed: 16519228
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Oct;19(10):555-557
pubmed: 26346993
Front Zool. 2017 Nov 6;14:50
pubmed: 29142585
Curr Biol. 2011 Apr 26;21(8):687-91
pubmed: 21497089
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Feb 13;286(1896):20182900
pubmed: 30963931
Behav Processes. 2016 Jul;128:83-8
pubmed: 27102762
Behaviour. 1974;49(3):227-67
pubmed: 4597405
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 10;113(19):E2750-8
pubmed: 27091968
Biol Lett. 2010 Aug 23;6(4):469-71
pubmed: 20106854
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2016 Jul;202(7):503-15
pubmed: 27277892
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):
pubmed: 24403724
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 1;108(9):3526-9
pubmed: 21278332
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 15;12(2):e0170001
pubmed: 28199318
Am J Primatol. 2017 Aug;79(8):
pubmed: 28464365
Biol Lett. 2011 Feb 23;7(1):23-5
pubmed: 20573617