The Current State of Communication of Urgent and Significant, Unexpected Diagnoses in Anatomic Pathology.


Journal

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine
ISSN: 1543-2165
Titre abrégé: Arch Pathol Lab Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7607091

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 09 2020
Historique:
accepted: 09 12 2019
pubmed: 6 2 2020
medline: 21 10 2020
entrez: 6 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The concept of critical diagnoses in anatomic pathology is relatively recent and rigorous study of the issue is quite limited. The College of American Pathologists and Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology issued a consensus statement in 2012. There has been no multi-institutional study of communication policies since then. To survey the policies of anatomic pathology laboratories regarding communication of critical values. A survey of the Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology membership was performed using a 14-question electronic survey tool. Responses were received from 38 institutions. Thirty-five of 38 (92%) had a policy on anatomic pathology critical values. Twenty-five of 38 (66%) respondents had read the College of American Pathologists/Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology consensus statement. Twelve of 38 (32%) institutions divided critical values into 2 categories, of which 9 used the College of American Pathologists/Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology terminology; 24 used only a single term, of which 11 used critical value. There was substantial variation in the diagnoses that were considered critical. A direct phone call to the responsible provider was uniformly considered an acceptable means of communication; all other methods had mixed or low support. The most common time frame was same day; many laboratories did not specify a timeframe. Most laboratories document date, time, and person to whom the result was communicated in the final report or an addendum report. Eighteen of 38 (47%) laboratories report an auditing mechanism for communication. Policies for communication of critical/urgent/significant, unexpected results in anatomic pathology are the norm. However, there remains significant variation between institutions in the details of these policies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32023089
pii: 427499
doi: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0436-OA
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1067-1074

Informations de copyright

© 2020 College of American Pathologists.

Auteurs

Paul N Staats (PN)

Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore (Staats, Ioffe).

Vinita Parkash (V)

Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (Parkash).

Christopher N Otis (CN)

Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Medical School - Baystate, Springfield (Otis).

Poonam Sharma (P)

Department of Pathology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska (Sharma).

Olga Ioffe (O)

Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore (Staats, Ioffe).

Erika R Bracamonte (ER)

Department of Pathology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson (Bracamonte).

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH