Association of Maximal Extent of Resection of Contrast-Enhanced and Non-Contrast-Enhanced Tumor With Survival Within Molecular Subgroups of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
/ administration & dosage
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ genetics
Child, Preschool
Cohort Studies
Contrast Media
/ administration & dosage
DNA Methylation
/ drug effects
Female
Glioblastoma
/ drug therapy
Humans
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
/ administration & dosage
Male
Middle Aged
Ohio
/ epidemiology
Prognosis
Promoter Regions, Genetic
/ drug effects
Retrospective Studies
Temozolomide
/ administration & dosage
Journal
JAMA oncology
ISSN: 2374-2445
Titre abrégé: JAMA Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101652861
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 04 2020
01 04 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
7
2
2020
medline:
29
12
2020
entrez:
7
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Per the World Health Organization 2016 integrative classification, newly diagnosed glioblastomas are separated into isocitrate dehydrogenase gene 1 or 2 (IDH)-wild-type and IDH-mutant subtypes, with median patient survival of 1.2 and 3.6 years, respectively. Although maximal resection of contrast-enhanced (CE) tumor is associated with longer survival, the prognostic importance of maximal resection within molecular subgroups and the potential importance of resection of non-contrast-enhanced (NCE) disease is poorly understood. To assess the association of resection of CE and NCE tumors in conjunction with molecular and clinical information to develop a new road map for cytoreductive surgery. This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included a development cohort from the University of California, San Francisco (761 patients diagnosed from January 1, 1997, through December 31, 2017, with 9.6 years of follow-up) and validation cohorts from the Mayo Clinic (107 patients diagnosed from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2014, with 5.7 years of follow-up) and the Ohio Brain Tumor Study (99 patients with data collected from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2011, with a median follow-up of 10.9 months). Image accessors were blinded to patient groupings. Eligible patients underwent surgical resection for newly diagnosed glioblastoma and had available survival, molecular, and clinical data and preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance images. Data were analyzed from November 15, 2018, to March 15, 2019. Overall survival. Among the 761 patients included in the development cohort (468 [61.5%] men; median age, 60 [interquartile range, 51.6-67.7] years), younger patients with IDH-wild-type tumors and aggressive resection of CE and NCE tumors had survival similar to that of patients with IDH-mutant tumors (median overall survival [OS], 37.3 [95% CI, 31.6-70.7] months). Younger patients with IDH-wild-type tumors and reduction of CE tumor but residual NCE tumors fared worse (median OS, 16.5 [95% CI, 14.7-18.3] months). Older patients with IDH-wild-type tumors benefited from reduction of CE tumor (median OS, 12.4 [95% CI, 11.4-14.0] months). The results were validated in the 2 external cohorts. The association between aggressive CE and NCE in patients with IDH-wild-type tumors was not attenuated by the methylation status of the promoter region of the DNA repair enzyme O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase. This study confirms an association between maximal resection of CE tumor and OS in patients with glioblastoma across all subgroups. In addition, maximal resection of NCE tumor was associated with longer OS in younger patients, regardless of IDH status, and among patients with IDH-wild-type glioblastoma regardless of the methylation status of the promoter region of the DNA repair enzyme O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase. These conclusions may help reassess surgical strategies for individual patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32027343
pii: 2760432
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.6143
pmc: PMC7042822
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
0
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Contrast Media
0
IDH2 protein, human
EC 1.1.1.41
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
EC 1.1.1.41
IDH1 protein, human
EC 1.1.1.42.
Temozolomide
YF1K15M17Y
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
495-503Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA097257
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA207360
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA227136
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS079697
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : K08 NS110919
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA230712
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Lancet Oncol. 2006 May;7(5):392-401
pubmed: 16648043
Bioinformatics. 2010 May 15;26(10):1357-63
pubmed: 20375111
Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Jul;10(7):372-85
pubmed: 24912512
J Neurosurg. 2009 Jan;110(1):156-62
pubmed: 18847342
Biometrics. 2012 Dec;68(4):1146-56
pubmed: 22519965
J Neurosurg. 2016 Apr;124(4):977-88
pubmed: 26495941
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 May;40(5):758-765
pubmed: 30948373
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 3;358(1):18-27
pubmed: 18172171
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;4(10):1405-1409
pubmed: 29955793
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):803-20
pubmed: 27157931
J Neurooncol. 2017 Aug;134(1):189-196
pubmed: 28551851
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Sep;13(9):916-26
pubmed: 22877848
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):997-1003
pubmed: 15758010
J Neurosurg. 2001 Aug;95(2):190-8
pubmed: 11780887
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2499-508
pubmed: 26061753
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 1;27(34):5743-50
pubmed: 19805672
Neuro Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;20(suppl_4):iv1-iv86
pubmed: 30445539
Nat Rev Neurol. 2019 Jul;15(7):405-417
pubmed: 31227792
Neuro Oncol. 2014 Jan;16(1):81-91
pubmed: 24305719
J Neurooncol. 2017 Oct;135(1):129-139
pubmed: 28689368
J Neurosurg. 2011 Jul;115(1):3-8
pubmed: 21417701
Neurosurgery. 2016 Apr;78(4):572-80
pubmed: 26813856
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011 Jun;153(6):1211-8
pubmed: 21479583
Neurosurgery. 2008 Mar;62(3):564-76; discussion 564-76
pubmed: 18425006
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 10;32(8):774-82
pubmed: 24516010
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2005 May;5(3):198-206
pubmed: 15865885