Physiological response to fluid resuscitation with Ringer lactate versus Plasmalyte in critically ill burn patients.
balanced solutions
base excess
clearance
metabolism
resuscitation
Journal
Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)
ISSN: 1522-1601
Titre abrégé: J Appl Physiol (1985)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8502536
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2020
01 03 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
7
2
2020
medline:
24
6
2021
entrez:
7
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The metabolic consequences in vivo of various balanced solutions are poorly known in critically ill patients. The main objective of this study was to describe the metabolic consequences of Plasmalyte versus Ringer lactate (RL) in critically ill burn patients, with a special focus on the plasma clearance of buffer anions (i.e., gluconate, acetate, and lactate). We conducted a randomized trial between August 2017 and October 2018 in a tertiary teaching hospital in Paris, France. Patients with burn total body surface area >30% were randomized to receive Plasmalyte or RL. The primary end point was the base excess 24 h after inclusion. The secondary end points were acetate, gluconate, and lactate plasma concentration, the strong ion difference (SID). Twenty-eight patients were randomized. Twenty-four hours after inclusion, plasma BE was not significantly different in the Plasmalyte and RL groups {-0.9 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): -1.8-0.9] vs. -2.1 [95% CI: -4.6-0.6] mmol/L, respectively,
Identifiants
pubmed: 32027547
doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00859.2019
doi:
Substances chimiques
Gluconates
0
Isotonic Solutions
0
Ringer's Lactate
0
Lactic Acid
33X04XA5AT
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM